Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.


“One should, I think, be cautious in describing Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation”, writes Noam Chomsky.

He continues:

“True, that is official US-Israeli doctrine, but the European Union and most of the rest of the world does not agree. The House just passed a resolution (380-3) condemning “the continuous terrorist attacks perpetrated by Hezbollah,” and the Senate passed a similar resolution unanimously. Middle East scholar Stephen Zunes contacted scores of congressional offices asking them to cite any terrorist acts by Hezbollah in the past decade. No one could cite any. In Lebanon, Hezbollah won about 80% of the vote in the South in the recent election. The South, of course, is where Hezbollah won its international fame, and much of its prestige in Lebanon: for driving Israeli invaders out of the country they had occupied for 22 years in violation of Security Council orders to withdraw (OK, because of a wink from the boss), while carrying out murderous atrocities, quite apart from the unprovoked 1982 invasion that probably killed about 20,000 people. In the US, that’s an unforgivable crime…”

  • leftvegdrunk

    Good post, mate. Well done.

  • Antony Loewenstein

    Thanks.In an age where anybody or group who disagrees with US imperialist aims is a "terrorist", some sense is sorely required…

  • Comical_Ali

    "One should, I think, be cautious in describing Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation", writes Noam Chomsky."very cautious especially when one looks at the their impressive resume – with the bombing of the Jewish community center in Argentina where 95 innocent people were murdered standing out in particular.Of course, for someone who called Holocaust denial "extesnive historical research", wrote a forward to and funded a neo-nazi book and was an ardent apologist and supporter of the murderous regime of Pol-Pot – one cannot expect very much from the warpped moral world of Chomsky…except for you're like who bask in his moral relativism and bankruptcy. Though moral relativism is an understatement — Chomsky is only to quick to label the US and its allies "terrorists" yet urges caution on labelling an organisation like Hezbollah "terrorist." I guess "activists" and "activism" would be better words to describe them and their activities or better still "honored, nobel and heroic freedom figthers…" or marytyers?inetersting antony, that you claim that this is an age where anybody or anyone is called a "terrorist" for disagreeing with US policy. When was the last time you were called terrorist for disagreeing with US policy?Now let me reverse the question a little bit – when was the last time you called someone a "racist", "facist" or "nazi" for simply disagreeing with you? That after all is the rallying cry of the extreme left and of Chomsky in particulalr. But the irony is, at the end of the day the likes of Chomsky (his endorsement of holocaust denial) have more in common with Neo-Nazis and racists than anyone else. Antony, ever realise that you're ideas and you're blog, along with its links shares a common platform with David Duke's racist website (thats right David Duke – Neo-Nazi and former Grand Wizard of the KKK)? He and other Aryan, Nazi, KKK web sites, also cite and link the likes of Chomsky and Finkelstein as well. Duke happens to be a very big fan of those two in particular.whats it like sharing a common platform with REAL Nazis and racists whilst at the same time you throw around those terms at anyone who dares disagree with you?

  • Antony Loewenstein

    Your inferences are hilariously and offensive.Because I share views with Finkelstein and Chomsky, as does David Duke, therefore I'm a Nazi? Er, many fascists share the views of your little heroes Bush, Blair and Howard, so how is that different?Your inability to maintain an argument means that you'll forever be on the sidelines sniping, while some of us are actually trying to write and contribute.Comical Ali. Bye.

  • Comical_Ali

    so wats it like to be finally branded one (from you're persective unfairly) after using the "racist"/""nazi" label as a weapon of choice against anyone who dares disagree with the far left chomskyite view of the world?Once again – you and you're ilk have allot more in common with white supermacists, racists and Nazis than anyone else…aside from Islamo-facists of course.can you name at least one racist white supermacist, neo-nazi, or former Grand drangon of the KKK who supported the war in Iraq or supports and sympathises with Israel? One Neo-Nazi who cites and references say Daniel Pipes over Norman FInkelstein?"Your inability to maintain an argument means that you'll forever be on the sidelines sniping, while some of us are actually trying to write and contribute."why dont you provide a response to the crux of my argument provided in my last post? sorry for not contributing to the way you would have liked me to contribute…Grand Dragon Lowenstein…

  • Antony Loewenstein

    Mate, comparing me to the KKK is downright offensive. As a Jew, I'd hope you could do better.Please don't contribute again.I'm asking nicely.For now, anyway.

  • Comical_Ali

    or esle what antony?downright offensive? Doesnt even compare to the type of tripe you peddle against Jews. or the type of tripe peddled by people who come on this forum (with one comparing Jews and Israel to Nazi germany)…how is that for offensive?dont like being compared to a Grand Dragon? Well, you reap what you sow. you certainly have allot more in common with them than with those whom you label "racist" and "facist."

  • Andjam

    Er, many fascists share the views of your little heroes Bush, Blair and HowardHyperlinks, please?

  • Comical_Ali

    All we need is one white supermacist who at least supports the "zionist entity" and doesnt agree with the Chomskiyite/Finkelstein view of the theres a challange for you antony…a challange which you will predictibly skip.