Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

The truth is out

The ongoing saga of Jewish Federal Labor MP Michael Danby and his attempts to censor my forthcoming book on Israel/Palestine continues today with an avalanche of “information” in the Australian Jewish News (AJN). Leaving aside the fact that Danby has provided priceless publicity for my work, he has caused the Jewish press to fire on all barrels. It’s all as badly scripted as a Hollywood action film and proves that genuine and open debate threatens the Jewish establishment and its proxies. Now is the time for individuals who believe in true democratic values to stand up and be counted. My book is out in May 2006. I look forward to the coming nine months.

One last point. I received an unexpected call this morning from the Jewish “comedian” Austen Tayshus. He demanded to know why I was writing my book – though, hilariously, thought I had written The Question of Zion – suggested Israel was a poor, defenceless Middle Eastern state threatened with annihilation, compared me to a German Jew who collaborated with the Nazis during the Second World War and asked why I had the right to air the community’s “dirty laundry.” I explained that he was clearly so insecure in his position that he felt the need to call and abuse me. I soon ended the call.

I smell desperation.

[UPDATE: A few minutes after posting this entry, I received another call from the Jewish “comedian” above. He said he would keep on calling me because I was an “ignoramus” and an “asshole.” He suggested we have a public debate, which I declined. He suggested Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi as a moderator (after telling me this morning that she was a “terrorist.”) The point of debating a man like this is negligible, for the simple fact that he doesn’t want to debate me – “a sad and lonely man”, in his words – nor actually discuss the issues. He wants to shout and rant. It may make him feel good about himself. He clearly needs it.]

The following news story appears in the AJN (the full version is only in the print edition):

Danby launches pre-emptive strike against Voices of Reason

FEDERAL MP Michael Danby has launched a blistering attack on a book about Australian Jewry’s responses to the Middle East conflict. But there’s a catch: the book, by Sydney-based journalist Antony Loewenstein, has not yet been published, and won’t reach bookstores until next May.

Danby, who declined to contribute material for the book, first slammed the book in a letter to the AJN (26/8) and this week reiterated his call to the Jewish community to “not spend a dollar” when the book is released because of the author’s track record.

“[Loewenstein] is completely alienated from the left, the right, the religious, the non-religious,” Danby said.

Loewenstein, a Jewish journalist and commentator, former Melburnian and onetime project leader for Victorian B’nai B’rith’s Courage to Care exhibition, has described himself on his web log as “a Jew who doesn’t believe in the concept of a Jewish state”.

The paper editorialised about the issue:

Voices of Reason

WERE the furore over the forthcoming publication of a book about Australian Jewry’s responses to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict not so serious, it would be comical. As it is, MP Michael Danby’s withering attack on Antony Loewenstein’s as-yet-unpublished book has triggered a deluge of letters to this newspaper, and reports of the peculiar brouhaha have unsurprisingly been picked up by the mainstream media.

If Danby’s aim was to urge a boycott of the book, or at least shun it to the margins of the literary world, his efforts appear to have backfired. The spat has cast the spotlight on the author, the publisher and the Australian Jewish community, and has therefore given what should have been a fairly-inconsequential book the oxygen required to court centre stage. Of course, Danby’s warning not to buy this book may be heeded by the majority of Australia’s Jews, but equally, the public’s curiosity over the stoush, as well as the media publicity, will no doubt elevate its prominence.

This newspaper unequivocally rejects Loewenstein’s view of a Jewish state as “a fundamentally undemocratic and colonialist idea from a bygone era” and his allegation that the Australian Jewish community’s reception to his views is “usually vitriolic, bigoted, racist and downright pathetic”.

We also question the judgment of the publisher, Melbourne University Publishing, which has just released Jacqueline Rose’s The Question of Zion, a book which metes out the same harsh treatment for Israel as we expect from Loewenstein. It may only be a coincidence, but the virtually back-to-back release of two anti-Israel books by the same publisher raises concerns.

But we also take issue with a federal MP, especially a Jewish federal MP, who calls for a boycott of a book whose only “crime” appears to be that its author does not subscribe to the mainstream Jewish-Zionist narrative of Israel. Loewenstein’s book may well be flawed — many leaders of the Jewish community, Danby included, refused to be interviewed for it — but we should, at the very least, await the published version before we decide to consign it to the garbage heap of literature. That is the least that can be expected from the “People of the Book”.

The following letters appear in the Melbourne edition of the AJN:


I FIND Michael Danby’s call to boycott a book that is not even published very disturbing. Particularly as his decision was based purely on the basis that he didn’t like the questions which Antony Loewenstein asked him.

Maybe what Danby feared most was exposing his answers to an Australian public unsympathetic to Danby’s uncritical support of Israel’s illegal settlements.

If Danby wants the freedom to express his ideas, objectionable to many, he must support, not oppose, the rights of others to express their ideas, disturbing as they may be. To suppress free speech is foolish and dangerous especially for a politician.

Norman Rothfield
Fairfield, Vic


I SUPPOSE I should be flattered that Louise Adler of Melbourne University Publishing (MUP), two members of the Loewenstein family and the socialist left’s Larry Stillman have all denounced me (AJN 2/9) for my comments on MUP’s decision to publish two anti-Israel books. No-one can say now they weren’t warned!

Let me tell readers of the AJN what Antony Loewenstein thinks of them. At his blog, where he describes himself as “a Jew who doesn’t believe in the concept of a Jewish state” (“a fundamentally undemocratic and colonialist idea from a bygone era”), he describes the Australian Jewish community’s response to his views as “usually vitriolic, bigoted, racist and downright pathetic” and as “incapable of hearing the true reality of their beloved homeland and its barbaric actions”.

This is the person Adler has commissioned to write a book about the Australian Jewish community and its attitudes to Israel. He is of course entitled to his opinions. But I am equally entitled to say that his opinions stink, and to urge Australian Jews not to put money in his pocket by buying his book.

Then we have Professor Jacqueline Rose, author of The Question of Zion, which MUP is also publishing. Writing recently in the London Review of Books, Rose discussed the psychology of Palestinian suicide bombers. Discussing two Israeli teenagers killed by their bombs, she writes: “In fact these young Israeli women are living in, and acutely suffering from, a society that encourages them to be blind.”

One of the young women Rose sneers at in this way is Melbourne-born teenager Malki Roth, killed in the Sbarro restaurant bombing in 2001. Rose writes of her: “In a letter addressed to God on the occasion of the Jewish New Year, Malki Roth ended with the hope ‘that I’ll be alive and that the Messiah should come’. (Is this wholesome?)”

I showed this passage to Malki Roth’s father Arnold. He wrote to me: “Poor refined Ms Rose is unable to look innocence in the face without vomiting. All of us can see a murderer and a victim, and tell the difference. But not Rose. Right and wrong for her are simply issues to be sliced, diced and agonised over until they figure a way for it to fit in with their global outlook… She leaves me very cold.”

Contrary to the rather overwrought complaints of Adler and Loewenstein, I am not trying to have anyone’s books banned or censored. [ed: Danby conveniently omits the fact that he initially called on MUP to “drop this whole disgusting project.”] I am pointing out the fundamental hostility of these authors to the beliefs and values of the great majority of the Jewish community — of most Australians, in fact. In other words, I am doing what I was elected to do: speak up for the people I represent.

Federal member for Melbourne Ports


LOUISE Adler (AJN 2/9), the CEO of Melbourne University Publishing (MUP), fails to understand the inference which many Jews will draw from the decision of MUP to publish Jacqueline Rose’s The Question of Zion and Antony Loewenstein’s Voices of Reason.

Professor Rose is one of the most visible anti-Israel activists in British academic life, who has sought and received enormous publicity for her efforts to boycott everything Israeli and then to destroy the State of Israel and replace it with a so-called bi-national state in which Palestinians would have an automatic majority. Her book, The Question of Zion, which was published in the UK and has now been published by MUP, fully reflects her efforts to demonise the Jewish State.

I have only occasionally read Antony Loewenstein’s blog. Probably 99 per cent of the readers of this newspaper would describe him as the Chomsky-Pilger type.

Of course both writers espouse a viewpoint which should be published and which should not be suppressed. My concern is whether MUP, probably the most respected and best-known academic publishers in Australia, should be publishing two tendentious works whose aim is to demonise Israel, with nothing whatever in the way of balance.

Professor Bill Rubinstein
University of Wales-Aberystwyth, UK

  • Shabadoo

    If Austen was so insecure in his position, then why did you hang up on him?Let's compare bios, shall we?Antony: Big-noting former f2 cadet and blogger with a university press book contract.Austen: Holds record for highest-selling Australian single ever; successful and well-known comedian; Best Film and Best Actor award winner; has a website that didn't come from blogspot's "free template" page. I think Austen can look after himself, big boy.

  • The Big Bad

    Hang tough AL. That guy hasn't made a contribution to anything for decades and what he did then wasn't even funny. It was crap.

  • Glenn Condell

    '[Loewenstein] is completely alienated from the left, the right, the religious, the non-religious,” Danby said.'Ah, but you ARE aligned with the quiet majority of sensible, non-extremist Australians. Shabadon'tare you Austen Tayshus? If not who are you? He was a boring one trick pony, still is. And if Ant is such a gnat so far as you're concerned, why the hell do you keep coming here to sully the bandwidth?

  • asdfsdafsda

    Shabadumb kindly shut up until you learn to stop being a complete idiot. Since that will never happen I guess we will never hear from you again making the comments on this blog far more truthful and far less idiotic.

  • evan jones

    I especially liked Rubinstein's bon mot about 'nothing whatever in the way of balance'.In the last month of August alone, the 'respectable' Australian media published a torrent of horseshit by the pro-Israeli lobby (Daniel Pipes and Yossi Halevi re-writing history, etc.).Then out of the blue the Age came good with a piece by Ali Kazak on the ongoing perfidy of the Israeli state in working to vitiate forever the prospect of a Palestinian state. Kazak's piece was the first piece published in our respectable media by a pro-Palestinian spokesperson since a piece by Joseph Wakim in the AFR in April 2002 – a mere 3 1/2 years! Nothing whatever in the way of balance is completely right, but not quite what Rubinstein means.

  • Darp

    Sheesh.How much can a Koala bare?!?!

  • Antony Loewenstein

    A lot more. Such is the price for entering the lion's den.Nine months to go. Repeat after me, nine months to go…

  • leftvegdrunk

    I agree with Glenn. And sometimes being "alienated from the left, the right, the religious, the non-religious" sounds like a bloody good position to be in.

  • Antony Loewenstein

    Count me in, too. I may be progressive, but that doesn't mean i agree with the so-called Left, Right or any other group. Free thinking is clearly a dangerous thing these days…

  • Gibbo

    "Free thinking is clearly a dangerous thing these days…"Which is why you don't do it very often, eh?Gutman is as funny as a fart in a space suit. I've always thought you were heaps funnier than him Ant. You've got a little way to go before you're as funny as Richard Neville but I have faith you'll get there (and you seem to do it without drugs!).You always manage to make me laugh. Thanks.

  • anthony

    You didnt answer Shabadoo's question. Why not debate Austen??

  • Antony Loewenstein

    If you can't understand that, then perhaps you should go to the back of the class…

  • Gibbo

    That's because a debate means that someone might present points of view that you don't agree with and we all know that "Free thinking is clearly a dangerous thing these days…"

  • Andjam

    A lot more. Such is the price for entering the lion's den.Nine months to go. Repeat after me, nine months to go…Has anyone else suffered from morning sickness by proxy? I feel like throwing up…

  • anthony

    "If you can't understand that, then perhaps you should go to the back of the class.."No. If i'm not understanding it, explain it!You are refusing to debate him because… He's 'rude'? He's not an academic? He's too ignorant for you? You don't have spare time? You feel sorry for him?I'd like to ask Alan Dershowitz if he would engage in a debate with you, i'm sure he'd give me similar answers.Do you wanna know why i will read your book, Mr. Loewenstein, because I like to hear different points of view…