Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Our convenient Middle East client state

Israel: US Foreign Assistance, Congressional Research Service, April 26, 2005:

“Israel is not economically self-sufficient, and relies on foreign assistance and borrowing to maintain its economy. Since 1985, the United States has provided $3 billion in grants annually to Israel. Since 1976, Israel has been the largest annual recipient of US foreign assistance, and is the largest cumulative recipient since World War II. In addition to US assistance, it is estimated that Israel receives about $1 billion annually through philanthropy, an equal amount through and short and long term commercial loans, and around $1 billion in Israel Bonds proceeds.”

The sooner more American people are made aware of this insane “investment”, the geography of the Middle East may undergo a radical realignment.

  • leftvegdrunk

    Antony, this harks back to a thread from a week or two ago. Will Ted Lapkin be invited to comment in this topic?

  • Antony Loewenstein

    It is a subject I intend spending much more time writing about – though mainly in my book. It's key and rarely examined.Lapkin wasn't invited last time…BUT he's very welcome to do so. As a loyal servant of the Israeli state – and dutiful propagandist – he'll no doubt be able to justify spending billions in maintaining an illegal and brutal occupation.

  • Ibrahamav

    The actions of the palestinian leadership, along with the Palestinian peoples support of the most heinous war crimes such as suicide bombing, makes the explanaition of spending Billions to protect the citizens of the only democracy in the middle east a cake walk.Are you suggesting that Israel destroy Jordan, Syria, and Egypt to radically realign the Middle east so that America won't have to continue to assist Israel?Sounds like you are war mongering now.

  • Edward Mariyani-Squi

    The justification is as easy as taking land from a baby. You just have to think creatively like an economist. Cutting through the misleading labels such as "grants" and "assistance", the Israeli state is providing a desired service to a customer. The customer and the supplier higgle and haggle a bit over what the former is willing to pay and what the latter is willing to accept until we have the monetarised value of the service. One can tell the same story (with slightly different labels) in the case of overseas private charity (payment for the 'commodity' of that warm fuzzy feeling that comes from knowing Israel occupies Holy Land), and loans (for investment in security and *cough* 'land acquisition'). Supply and demand squawked the parrot, supply and demand.

  • Ibrahamav

    Now that you reduced it to simple transactions, there is no reason for anyone here to complain. Both partners benefit. That is what is known as a good deal. The Arabs should learn all about this.

  • Pete's Blog

    It goes without saying that the Jewish lobby strongly (and rightly) influences the US Government, and hence foreign policy and aid to Israel .The fact that the US listens to its Jewish citizens is a mark of of democracy.Like bombing Serbian killers in Kosovo the US (rarely but sometimes) attempts to do good works. Protecting Israel (post Holocaust) is a case in point.Knowledge that Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons is rarely mentioned but a key fact concern in support for Israel.The US knows that if it sharply dropped its monetary, and by extension political, support for Israel that Israel might get lonely and paranoid.The emergence of Muslim nuclear weapons (already in Pakistan) justifiably feeds this paranoia.The spectre of a regional nuclear war between Israel and Muslim states (eg Pakistan, Iran) no doubt causes nightmares for strategic planners in the CIA and Pentagon. So its a whole lot cheaper and politically popular to keep the money flowing and keep Israel feeling secure.I agree with this US approach on moral, democratic and avoiding Armageddon grounds.In any case private money going as loans, floats, international joint ventures, and other financial mechanisms by American Jews to Israelis may well be much higher than US government aid – got any figures?

  • Wombat

    Few would argue that what you raised is supported by evidence, though I have no position on whether the state of affairs is right or wrong. Given how resourceful Israel is in just about everything they do, there are certainly countries in more dire straights than Israel. Irrespective of how good relations are between them, the fact remains that we are talking about 2 countries and as such, there will be situations when their respective interests are at odds. I am not one for believing what politicians have to say, which is why I remain suspicious when they espouse good intentions. When was the last time someone knocked on your door and said. "I'm from the govenment and I;m here to help you"?In an ideal world, it woudlk be fine and dandy to have the US operate as the policefore for the world and Israel, for the Middle East. Obviously, idealism is the elixir of fools.As I see it, deferreing the policing of the world to the US these days is a bit like giving an acoholic the keys to the liquor cabinet.

  • Ibrahamav

    But the US attends AA meetings and the vast majority of the rest of the world is merrily drinking as if they didn't have a problem,wandering about, drunk as lords.

  • Wombat

    You are nothing if not imaginative ibrahimav.

  • meika

    "its a heavily subsidise religious disneyland in a goat effed desert"i first posted that in a thread over at Tim Blair, but it got censored, of course, a couple of years ago.vacuus leadership… european nationalist romantic ideology… and an obese sugar daddy.we're all doomed

  • Edward Mariyani-Squi

    Ibrahamav said… "But the US attends AA meetings"yeah, but only to pick up chicks with low self-esteem.

  • Ibrahamav

    You saw that movie, too? Top knotch.

  • anthony

    It goes without saying that the Jewish lobby strongly (and rightly) influences the US Government, and hence foreign policy and aid to Israel .I believe the politically correct term is 'Zionist lobby'.