Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.


Daniel Pipes reminds readers that some Muslims aren’t so bad after all:

“It is a tragic mistake to lump all Muslims with the forces of darkness. Moderate, enlightened, free-thinking Muslims do exist. Hounded in their own circles, they look to the West for succour and support. And, however weak they may presently be, they eventually will have a crucial role in modernizing the Muslim world.”

Perhaps he would like to remind his readers that the vast majority of Muslims are “moderate, enlightened, free-thinking” and a tiny minority are intolerant and violent. Not unlike most other religions, in fact.

  • orang

    “…Hounded in their own circles, they look to the West for succour and support.”..

    (Yeah right, and he should have added)

    “F*kheads like myself should refrain from inciting hatred against muslims in general in order to help the moderates in their task. Even though my whole reason d’etre is sh*tting on the muslims-particularly arabs and especially Palestinians, I promise to try and make an honest living without resorting to using words like ‘Islamofascists’. Read more from me in FrontpageMagazine and the New York Sun.”

  • Progressive Atheist

    I'd like to hear Daniel Pipes' views on the European cartoon controversy.

  • Antony Loewenstein

    Here is Pipes on the cartoon issue:

  • JohD
  • OshKosh

    "Perhaps he would like to remind his readers that the vast majority of Muslims are "moderate, enlightened, free-thinking" and a tiny minority are intolerant and violent. Not unlike most other religions, in fact."Why, it certainly doesn't look that way.

  • Wombat

    "Why, it certainly doesn't look that way."You mean, compared to this tolerant and non vilent role model?Ex-U.N. Inspector: Decision Already Made To Attack Ira <a href="http://n<br />Russian Ultranationalist Leader Expects U.S. to Attack Iran in Late March digs in for a 'long war' as Rumsfeld issues global call to arms

  • Progressive Atheist

    Thanks for the link, Antony.This quote from Pipes is hilarious:Nor, by the way, have imams protested the stomping on the Christian cross embedded in the Danish flag.That's right, by stomping on the Danish flag, the protesters are insulting Christianity! The problem is, why aren't Christians upset about this?

  • orang

    addamo_01, what's happening see, Rummy and the boys are helping out the moderate muslims.(like Daniel Pipes is doing) They are selecting to bomb the Islamofascist states like Iran (Yeeeeeehaaaaa!) So when they "out" the lunatics like Ajimajad (or whatever his name is) then the moderate muslims will be even better at influencing change to democracy and mutual understanding in the muslim world.See?(Oh god, I'm watching Cheney being interviewed by Jim Lehrer on SBS telling us that they have the right to spy on Americans after 9/11 and I'm fantasizing I've got a sniper rifle like "The Day of the Jackal" and shoot the exploding bullet into Cheney's pumpkin head…STOP THINKING LIKE THIS!!!)

  • Aaron Lane

    Progressive Aetheist, I completely fail to see why that quote of Pipes's is so hilarious. I presume you mean that because Christians didn't take offense at the desecration of their symbol, it is ok. That reasoning is moronic. Muslims take offense at disrespectful treatment of Mohammed. Fine. They must therefore see religion as sacrosanct. Why, then, do they then go and disrespect a Christian symbol? It has nothing to do with the views of Christians. I presume you are against having intercourse with ten year old girls. If you were to visit a culture that thought this practice perfectly ok, however, would you then turn around and do it? Of course not, because your objection to it would have no relation to its acceptance by the foreign culture. Why then would Muslims who had a genuine respect for all religions think it ok to desecrate a christian religion symbol just because Christians weren't going to react violently to it? They wouldn't. It just goes to prove that the maniacs violently protesting are not genuinely respectful of all religions, but instead see Islam as some supreme ideology which all must kowtow too. By the way, I think it odd that you call yourself Progressive Aetheist, since you spend most of your time defending right-wing religious lunatics, which is neither progressive nor aetheistic.

  • orang

    The point is; they thought they were jumping on the flag of Denmark.It was only f*ckheaded Pipes who threw in the "Christian" angle – as you would if you were a f*ckheaded c&cksuking lunatic rabid muslim hater like Pipes.

  • Wombat

    Orang,Trust me, I have this fantasy about taking Bush, Rummy, Cheney, Bolton, Wolfowitz, Feith and the rest of these psycopaths out ona boat somewhere in the middle of the Pacific and wrapping chains to their ankles, weighed down by big cement blocks.And then, I would…..well yo get the idea.

  • Wombat

    Yes Pipes is such a slavish devotee of the battle of Civilizations. he rarely gives up an opportunity to jump on the pro confrontation bandwagon.

  • Wombat

    Here's an interesting article from Justin Raimondo abtou the whole Pipes/Flemming team. It turns out that Flemming is an admirer of Pipes – Imagine my surprirse.Even more laughable it that "Pipes is the founder of Campus Watch, an organization devoted to stamping out any and all academic treatments of Middle Eastern affairs that don't conform to his narrow strictures, which might be mildly described as fanatically hostile to Islam, Arabs, and anyone who opposes his extreme Israeli nationalism. Campus Watch is engaged in compiling blacklists of professors who refuse to spout the pro-Israel party line, and actively encourages students to spy on their teachers and report miscreants."So it turns out that Mr Pipe's screed abtou freedom of speech is really about freedom to agree with him.I'm suspect there is more to Flemming's neocon connections than meets the eye.