Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Differing realities

Leonard Fein, The Forward, February 10:

“Here’s a puzzle, a small piece of a much larger set of nagging issues that bubbles just beneath the surface of our ordinary lives: On December 23, 2005, Lawrence Kaplan, a senior editor of The New Republic, asserted in The Wall Street Journal that ‘Israeli officials were lukewarm about the war [in Iraq] from the outset, being far more concerned with the threat from Iran.’

“Yet now we have a book by James Risen, national security correspondent for The New York Times, titled ‘State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration,’ that argues the exact opposite.

“In a section on the prewar jockeying in Washington, Risen describes the role of Paul Wolfowitz, then undersecretary of defense. Wolfowitz, he writes, found the CIA ‘insufficiently hawkish,’ believed it ‘an arrogant, rogue institution…unwilling to support administration policymakers.’ Specifically, Wolfowitz insisted on examining ‘the possibility that Saddam Hussein was behind the [September 11] attacks on the United States,’ a possibility that the CIA discounted.

“Now comes the kicker: ‘Israeli intelligence played a hidden role in convincing Wolfowitz that he couldn’t trust the CIA… Israeli intelligence officials frequently travelled to Washington to brief top American officials, but CIA analysts were often sceptical of Israeli intelligence reports, knowing that Mossad had very strong – even transparent – biases about the Arab world.’ Wolfowitz, who ‘had begun meeting personally with top Israeli intelligence officials,’ preferred the Mossad’s analysis to the CIA’s.

“Now it cannot be that Israeli officials were at one and the same time ‘lukewarm about the war’ yet busy shuttling back and forth to encourage Wolfowitz’s evident eagerness for that same war. From all that we know regarding Wolfowitz and his ideological associates – Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and others – the Risen version seems to me the more plausible.”

The full truth of the Iraq war is yet to emerge, though Israel’s key involvement is a given. Now that the Jewish state’s head of domestic security says he misses Saddam, one can be assured that the gross failure of the Iraq war is starting to bite.

  • weekbyweek

    Two words debunk this categorically: utter bollocks!

  • Progressive Atheist

    Why utter bollocks? Please give us a reasoned explanation.

  • orang

    If there's ever an example of why academics should not enter politics, Wolfowitz is numero uno.

  • Clumsy Birds

    The full truth of the Iraq war is yet to emerge, though Israel's key involvement is a given. Yeah! What's the Israeli leadership thinking? Wanting to get rid of a dictator who fired 20 scuds at Jewish suburbs. How dare they have the… the… Arrogance! to want security.

  • Wombat

    weekbyweek, you have no idea what you are talking about. This is supported by too much information to be dismissed.Can there be any doubt as to this being true? Consider these points:1. In preparation for the war, Wolfowitz underling, Douglas Feith, was put in charge fo a new office in NESA called the Office of Special Plans, to come up with arguments and evidence to attack Iraq.2. According to former NESA employee at the Pentagon, Lt. Karen Kwiatkowski , who worked in the OSP, she said that following 911, all visitors to the Pentagon has to sign in. The exception were Israeli high ranking military who would walk in as though they owned the place. She even observed occasions when Feith was in meetings with other people and these people would arrive and either demand to know who Feith was meeting with, or barge in regardless.3. Wolfowitz, Feith and Richard Perle, the most vocal proponents for the war, were equally vocal about the CIA being too conservative.4. Larry Franklin, who has been nabbed for passing on calcified information to Israeli lobbyists, was an employee at Feith’s office.5. Feith and Perle have both had their security clearances revoked in the past for passing secret information to Israeli officials. Both had those clearances re-instated by Rumsfled when the Bushies came to power.6. The first investigation by the Senate Select Intelligence Committee into intelligence failures, completely sidestepped the role played by the OSP. Pat Roberts and the Republican party have dragged their heels about completing Phase II, which was too look into the role played by the OSP.7. Ariel Sharon was having the same problems with the Mossad that Dick Cheney;s office was having with the CIA, which were both unwilling to corroborate unvetted intelligence, so he too set up an equivalent of and Israeli OSP at the Pentagon.8. When the Iraq invasion started to head South, Israel made a statement about pursuing other avenues and forming closer relationships with the Kurds. Now why would they be looking for other avenues if they didn’t have a stake in the Iraq invasion to begin with?I can provide links to all of the above.

  • Wombat

    Israel showed a lot fo restraint during the Gulf War, but their reason for wantingf to remove Saddam was unrelated to that. Like the US, Israle wants to maintain it's dominance in the region, which is why they are puching to the US to hit Iran and Syria.Nothign to do with security and everything to do with hegemony.

  • Glenn Condell

    'Wolfowitz, who 'had begun meeting personally with top Israeli intelligence officials,' preferred the Mossad's analysis to the CIA's.'These people are traitors. Addamo's comprehensive list mentions the previous form of Feith and Perle in slipping classified American govt documents to Israel, but Wolfowitz too has had his credentials revoked for the same breach. How is it that they (a) are appointed to sensitive posts (again) and (b) they are permitted closed door, unrecorded meetings with the intelligence agents of a foreign power?With Mossad's fingerprints all over the bullshit prewar intel via Feith and Ledeen, and some distinctly uncomfortable questions about it's foreknowledge of the 911 attacks, not to mention honeytraps like Golan Cipel and full on spies like Pollard, it is passing strange that the special relationship, on the face of it, remains firm. But there is a termite burrowing quietly away at the is edifice, name of Fitzgerald. Hope he doesn't plan any trips in small planes.

  • Clumsy Birds

    Addamo, let's assume you are correct that Israel wants hegemony in the ME (and ever has a chance of getting it), what for?I'd venture to say for security.

  • Wombat

    I venture to say, ultimate aspirations for expanding it's boundaries.That's what it's been doing for decades has it not. Bulldozing Palesitnian homes under the name of security. Building Israeli settlements on those very sites under the pretext of security, and then inserting check points to protect those newly developed settlements.Yes, security is a gift that keeps on giving.

  • Clumsy Birds

    I venture to say, ultimate aspirations for expanding it's boundaries.Even if a few far-right- or even left- dodo's plan on reclaiming all the biblical land of Eretz Israel, it's not an option.Expansion is not what Israel has been 'doing for decades'. It's what you and the feral-left (I normally hate to generalise) think Israel has been doing since 1948.

  • orang

    Clumsy Birds said… "Addamo, let's assume you are correct that Israel wants hegemony in the ME (and ever has a chance of getting it), what for? I'd venture to say for security. "Clumsy. Israel has agents in the Kurdish areas of Iraq bordering Iran. – What for?… Security?

  • James Waterton

    Why would they have voluntarily given up the Sinai if territorial expansion was/is the aim? They were clearly in a position to hold it – forever, if they wanted.