As for a zionist movement, that was not under discussion. Just an interpretation.

Weasel words? Are you that ridiculous to deviate from discussion to insult? Are you addamo in disguise?

It is usually accepted that the majority of those who practice the christian faith are not zionists.

Weazle-wording. Not “usually accepted”, the more accurate word is “true”.

But I have not seen christian groups use the word ‘deranged’ when describing the interpretation of scripture by those christians who are zionists.

You’re right – the more portentous words used are “deviant” and “heretical”.

Nor have I read anything mainstream to suggest this is a new interpretation.

The you should do some reading. The Zionist movement is largely a North American 1970s phenomenon. In the history of Christianity, that’s very recent.

Nor have I read anything mainstream to suggest this is a new interpretation. Unless you are considering anything after 100 years or so ago as new.

It is safe to conclude that the majority of zionists are christian.

Maybe, but the majority of Christians certainly aren’t Zionists.

A minority of theologically deviant Christian nutcases (almost exclusively in the US) are Zionists due to their primitivist reading of various Biblical passages. The vast majority of Christians do not hold to this new and deranged reading of scripture. By definition, the majority of Christians are not Zionists.

We’ve come to a universal understanding here that you use “it appears” when you are wrong or can’t produce any evidence. You get 10 out of 10 for consistency.

Ignorance of christian doctrine? I’ve made no statements about christian doctrine.

I’m sure no one is surpised that you’ve made up that also.

It was your ignorance of Chrisian doctrine that led me to believe that you must be Jewish.

Not only you not smarter than me, but you are frighfully juvenille and immature.

You do more than misquote. It is not worth the bother to correct most things you do