Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Camels of mass destruction


  • Addamo

    Well, why not. In lieu of dolphins, sea lions, and such, a camel will do. Oh, how about shoving a war head up Hitchen's butt and send him staggering. I got it! Let's bring back the carrier pidgeon! Elephants just won't do, been there and all that. How about a volkswagon? Gotta have some way to deploy this giant pile of stuff leftover from the loads sent over by the U.S. back in the day. Oh, yeah, forgot – THERE ISN'T ANY.

  • smiths

    you can just picture the war games at the pentagon,
    they dispatch their insect reconaissance thingies to russia and china and iran, but those clever foreigners have got flying robot fish that eat the insects and head to america where they are beaten back by laser guided dolphins and sharks, ridiculous,
    anyway you dont need to load up camels with anything, they already have toxic spit, you just need to teach them to spit on command

  • Chris

    The Palestinians use donkeys to bomb civilians (and PETA then protests the donkey's death).

    From LGF:

    Determined to make Hampton Roads look like a breeding ground for wackos to the rest of the world, PETA President Ingrid Newkirk this week fired off a fax to Yasser Arafat.

    She began the letter with a polite salutation: “Your Excellency.”

    I can think of lots of titles for Arafat. Excellency isn't among them.

    But I digress.

    “. . . We have received many calls and letters from people shocked at the bombing . . . in which a live donkey, laden with explosives, was intentionally blown up.

    “All nations behave abominably in many ways when they are fighting their enemies, and animals are always caught in the crossfire. The U.S. Army abandoned thousands of loyal service dogs in Vietnam. (Odd. No mention of our dead soldiers, MIAs, POWs or even loyal South Vietnamese allies who were left behind, but again, I digress.)

    “Al-Qaeda and the British government have both used animals in hideously cruel biological weaponry tests.”

    Brace yourselves. It gets worse.

    “We watched on television as stray cats in your own compound fled as best they could from Israeli bulldozers”

    Fleeing cats! PETA confronts the horror of war.

    UPDATE: I forgot, I need to label things like this. This is not a joke.

  • Addamo

    Adn the US used dolphins during WWII, sent a monkey into space and is considering using sharks also. The point it that 4 legged creatures are not WMD.

  • Progressive_Atheist

    PETA President Ingrid Newkirk this week fired off a fax to Yasser Arafat.

    Newsflash: Arafat is dead.

  • captain

    Arafat is dead, but the terrorists live on.

  • Chris

    History. You were supposed to learn it in school.

  • Antony Loewenstein

    So many terrorists, so little time. Perhaps we should just nuke the whole Middle East. But, then, that leaves so many more terrorists in Asia, Africa and Australia. Maybe we could forcibly transfer them to Antartica. No to TERRORISTS!

  • Addamo

    Arafat is dead, but the terrorists live on.

    As do murderers, war criminals and the criminal elite.

    OT Here, but last night I went to see the new film V for Vendetta. Don't knwo if it's playing in OIz yet, but it was a hertwarming hoot. Compltely unrealistic Hollywood ending but one can see why the right winders are up in arms over the film.

  • edward squire

    Chris Mar 27th, 2006 at 2:47 pm

    The Palestinians use donkeys to bomb civilians

    Bloody donkeys. Is there no end to their murdereous reign?

  • captain

    John you are dead wrong. I and all of the Israelis I know are more than happy to live and let live. Israel would be far better off with a happy palestinian population as a neighbour. And most Israelis would agree with this. The problem is that there is no reciprocity in this view. Even today Hamas plays games with its call to have a dialogue with the international community, bit not Israel. Its called splitting and like Iran, it represents a delaying tactic.

  • captain

    I wonder how Edward would feel about people making jokes about killing palestinians.

  • Chris

    Do you really care?

  • John Ryan

    thats about the point Chris Captain And Ali you dont care care, kill the Palestinians or better still make them serfs then you will be happy.

  • Chris

    That, I'm sure, all of us care about. You, on the otherhand, are not worth caring about.

    Why won't Antony comment on the Palestinian's use of suicide donkeys? Is that where Saddam got the idea?

  • edward squire

    captain Mar 27th, 2006 at 10:15 pm

    I wonder how Edward would feel about people making jokes about killing palestinians.

    About the same. I don't discriminate.

  • Addamo


    It is refreshing to hear that this sentiment exists, but it get's back to the matter of what such a Palestinia state would look like. Would it be the series of disconnected enclaved that presently exist or woud it include eh West Bank and parts of Jerusalem? If not, then how can you expect reciprocity?

    Furthermore, while I believe too that Israeli's themselves want a solutino, I do not believ that israel's leaders want the same thing. This is probabyl why Hamas wants to engage the international community, but not Israel.

    If hams is indeed emplying delaying tactics, then they are futile. Delaying tactics are suiting the Israelis far more than the Palestinians.

  • Chris


    Cap is correct. Israel prospers with a happy peaceful palestinian neighbor. But, it appears nothing short of genocide will make the Palestinians happy. That is why they voted for Hamas.

  • Addamo


    If you lrealyl want this discussion to move forward, then you might want to consider dropping the bumper sticker slogans. Israel hardly vote for a saintly figure when electing Sharon.

    hamas has called for contructive disciussions. If you insist that israel want a positive outcome, then let's see whether Hamas is serious about the same thing, raher than dismiss them outrighte as bloodthirsty genocidal maniacs.

  • Chris

    Israel did not elect a terrorist organization whose platform includes genocide. There has been no calls for constructive discussion from Hamas.

    You see whether or not Hamas wants peace, Israel already knows they do not.

  • Addamo

    You see whether or not Hamas wants peace, Israel already knows they do not.

    That's so convenient isn't it, with Israel drawing it;s own borders and all? Forget that Hamas is talking about negotiations, we knwo that they don;lt mean it and we have no choice but to steal this land.

    Israel to the Palkestinians, "Sorry folks, we dont; wanna do this. Really, honest to god, this is going to hurt us more than it hurt you, but what choice do we have?"

  • Chris

    Yes, it is convenient. Now that the Palestinians have proven once and for all that they are not interested in peace, it is time to draw the borders and finish the fence.

  • edward squire

    Chris Mar 29th, 2006 at 12:44 pm

    Now that the Palestinians have proven once and for all that they are not interested in peace

    When "peace" means "slow dispossession and death", why would they be? Notice how they never say they want "peace" – they always say they want a 'JUST peace". It's the "just" part the Israeli government seems to have the most problems with.

  • Chris

    They certainly are interested in the death of Jews, slow or otherwise. That seems to be part of their definition of a 'just peace'.

    All humans should have a problem with that.

  • edward squire

    Chris Mar 31st, 2006 at 7:27 am

    They certainly are interested in the death of Jews, slow or otherwise. That seems to be part of their definition of a ‘just peace’.

    No, that's the response to being occupied, dispossessed and oppressed for 30 years.

  • Chris

    Since they were certainly interested in the death of Jews, slow or otherwise, for the last 100 years, it has nothing to do with your thoughts.

    Arab xenophobia is well known.