Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Ladies and gentlemen, the al-Zarqawi show!

The terrorist “mastermind” has returned and the mainstream media seem to have swallowed the bait. As Robert Fisk rightly says – in a fairly rambling way, it must be said – Bin Laden and al-Zarqawi are in many ways irrelevant to the wider struggle.

The genie is out of the bottle.

  • viva peace

    Most serious people I have spoken to agree that Fisk is either drinking while he takes his meds or he is still in shock and meltdown over the huge yawn and silence that followed the publication of his embarrassing magnus opus. Even Tony Jones thinks he is little better than light amusement. Yet, our fearless leader AL fashions himself as the Antipodean Fisker!

  • smiths

    so, ignore tha actual point of the post and just have a go at fisk again, is that it?

    oh well, never mind, i will engage with the point, what amazes me is how short our attention spans must be gauged to be, for it can only be two weeks ago that it was widely exposed that the pentagon had been using zarqawi as a propoganda tool,
    are we supposed to dismiss that news and swallow this so soon

  • viva peace


    Ah, hullo!!?? Fisk is "the point" of the post. And you, rather than engage with the "real" story which is the hysterical, yet disturbing, lack-of-credibility of that "point."

  • viva peace

    OMG. I just laughed so much I spat my VB all over the keyboard! :)) You have got to read this

    Look, Look, Look, Look. Fisk’s points are all very simple. Zarqawi is just a figurehead whom we just are encouraged to loathe, who, at the end of the day, is not a person whom we need to worry about. Although he is a problem for all of us (Fisk, too). The West bestializes Zarqawi, although he is genuinely a bad guy (no doubt about it). It is wrong for us to paint the Middle East as a fight between good and evil, although Bin Laden and Zarqawi are monstrous. We created Zarqawi, although he created himself, and we helped, although he used to exist as a fantasy figure created by American propaganda. The media perpetuates these myths every time it blames Zarqawi, although he is to blame, and it would be absolutely wrong for reporters to ignore the things he is to blame for. Zarqawi’s existence supports American propaganda, but his continued existence is also a severe blow to American credibility.

    You stupid Blairites all are just too dumb to understand nuance.

    from Tim Blair's site. It is a brilliant satire on Robert Fisk's whole life! In a more serious moment I'm not sure how healthy the implosion of all these white bourgeois leftist males is for journalism as a whole.

  • Glenn Condell

    'I’m not sure how healthy the implosion of all these white bourgeois leftist males is for journalism as a whole.'

    Lemming. Tiresome pipsqueak.

    When we crash and burn after following the US down the road to ruin, you fools will still be chuntering on about leftists and journos, teachers and unionists, haw haw haw. It'll all be our fault, won't it Einstein?

    We all have bigger fish to fry thanks to pinheads all over the West too stupid to realise they'd been had. You won't even notice til it's too late. Have you ever seen anything coming that stuck out like dog's balls beforehand, like say the disaster in Iraq or of the Bush regency in general?

    It won't give us white male lefties much pleasure to say I told you so, but we will anyway.

  • Addamo

    I admire Fisk, but I must admit that wahcing that interview, Fisk looked like he was completely out of it. For a man who is normally very succinct, he was very incoherent.

    Fisks point abtou Zarqawi is pretty much on the money. Teh fact that this very cheesy video appeared the same week as Bin Landen's, and coincided with Bish's polls ratings heading ito Nixonian territory is becommign so predictabel, I am amazed any gives these videos any regard.

    Fisk is comepltely right about Zarqawi being hyped. Only last week, the Penatgo all but admitted that that they have used Zarqawi for propaghanda purposes and that they even released fake correspondence of his to the media.

    An April 10th Washington Post article stated, that..

    "The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program. The effort has raised his profile in a way that some military intelligence officials believe may have overstated his importance and helped the Bush administration tie the war to the organization responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks."

    Military Plays Up Role of Zarqawi

    Even worse, the article goes on to say how the Pentagon had concocted fake Al-Zarqawi letters, boasting about suicide attacks and leaked them to Dexter Filkins of the New York Times, who splashed it on the front page the next day. Despite the fact that Filkins had severe doubts about the authenticity of the letter, the Times got down on their knees, licked boots, and published it anyway.

    The same documents directly state that the false promotion of Al-Zarqawi includes marking the the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign."

    A U.S. 'Propaganda' Program, al-Zarqawi, and 'The New York Times'

    Finalyl, let's not forget that Bush had more than one opportunity to take out Zarqawi's camp prior to the Iraq invasion and chose not to because they wanetd to use his presence in Iraq (acually under the no fly zones in Kurdistan), to argue to eh UN that Iraq was a spoensor of terror.

    Viva, I'm a little surprised that you are such a fan of Tim Blair. I ecpetdd you to have some intellectual accumen. The more you reveal yourself, the more obvious it becomes what a shill you really are.

  • JohD

    The agitprop is getting sloppy. On April 10th it was widely reported that the Pentagon was going to play up the role of Zarqawi as a treat to Iraqi stability, now we have the planted video broadcast on al-Jazeera. How is it that there is never a link provided to the 'websites' where these videos are planted? How is it that unnamed 'sources' always confirm that the video is 'authentic'? It is too ridiculous for words.

  • Addamo

    Perfectly put JohD.