Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Good for us

In late April, the world’s foremost intellectual addressed a group of future US soldiers:

The U.S. Military Academy at West Point was host last night to one of the world’s foremost critics of American foreign policy.

Noam Chomsky, the Institute Professor Emeritus of Linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, spoke at the academy as part of its Distinguished Lecture Series.

More than 500 people attended the lecture, most of them cadets who could someday serve in the Iraq war.

Last night, they heard the gray-haired scholar explain that, in his view, that the war in Iraq is unjust.

Chomsky, who spoke on the issue in response to a question from a cadet, said that while the war could be called preventive, it was still an act of aggression by the United States that most people in the world didn’t support.

He added that Iran might legitimately have grounds for its own preventive war.

“If preventative war is legitimate under these circumstances, it’s legitimate for everybody,” he said.

Chomsky raises an important point. Current Western “logic” dictates the notion of pre-emptive war as legitimate and acceptable. What if Iran, North Korea, Syria, and a host of other nations decided similarly? Washington, London and Canberra would never accept this, of course, refusing to see the profound hypocrisy in their position; Western exceptionalism is notorious throughout the developing world.

  • smiths

    i have managed to hook up my own 'rightwing mouthpiece machine' which i call 'the captain'
    marvelous machine it is, it doesnt need any processing power because it ignores all information and does no actual thinking,
    and i think this is an ideal story to test feed a few key words in and get a statement…

    "Noam Chomsky is foremost a self hating anti-semite. I think what he is trying hard to say is that he hates Israel and America and that his position is racism and antidisestablishmentarianism by any other name. No-one has the right to wage war except Israel and america and if they do they are anti-semites. Bastards. Go to Saudi Arabia if you dont agree with me and love democracy by bayonnett. You are all bigots and nukes are great"

    well i think it went a bit off topic to be honest,
    and it definately threw that big word in to try and prove its intellectual superiority which is not a good sign,
    over all though i think its functioning reasonably well,

    feedback welcome

  • Addamo

    Very funny Smiths. Right on the mark with that one.

    Who would ever have thought Chomsky would be invited to speak at Wetspoint? What a great moment.

    Chomsky's point is so obvious, yet he has to explain it to these poor souls who put their lives on the line.

    The hipocrisy is astounding. The US sees as perfeclty legitimate, it's manipulation and control of Latin America, which it considers it;s domain, yet any effort by Iran to ifluence what is taking place over it's border is regarded as meddling and running interference.

  • But nations, of course, have national interests. They are rarely intellectually "fair" to those other nations they label as enemies.

    Before attacking a country a nation needs reason's it can sell to its own public and (usually) the world at large.

    The President of Iran (through his speeches) is giving Israel (and its big brotheer the US) saleable reasons to attack.

    Why is he doing this? What kind of preventative war can he wage against them?

  • viva peace


    You are so naive. You clearly have no clue what role Chomsky plays in Pentagon and CIA propoganda.

  • viva peace


    If those countries started a war, they have Iraq to look forward to, except much worse. The ball is in their court.

  • i did such a double take when i first read this. i would really like to know which DoD and pentagram players made this happen. go noam!

    remember kids: aggression, bombing, invasion etc are always ok when the White Man does it to poor brown people. been that way since…well, most of white history. and like the guy cheney shot in the face, brown folks are expected to apologize for getting in the way of all those bullets.

  • Addamo


    You are so naive. You clearly have no clue what role Chomsky plays in Pentagon and CIA propoganda.

    Do I detect a conspiracy theory? Go on, say it. Chomsky is a CIA operative right Viva?

  • smiths

    oncce again viva, making strange statements,

    anyone that claims to 'know' how the cia and pentagon manage chomsky and calls someone naive in this regard is just talking like a wanker,

    whatever aspects of US policy chomsky misses he has probably done more to open the minds of uni students and young radicals questioning hegemony than any other man in the last 30 years,
    if the book that started me on this course, 'manufacturing consent' is CIA propoganda then i am a monkeys uncle,

    i really wonder about you viva

  • Glenn Condell

    Chomsky's point is a good one but it is one made repeatedly several years ago by plenty of people, me included.

    To wingnut commandoes who demanded we all fall into line behind a policy of pre-emption I used to ask 'if China is wearing the pants in 20 years, you'd still be OK with the pre-emption concept eh?' The subject changed or they disappeared.

    Chomsky's failure to confirm the Mearsheimer Walt thesis (another set of contentions lots of us have been discussing for years, here as much as anywhere else) is one of his only blind spots for me. An understandable one, but unfortunately for his credibility as a balanced analyst, it's a biggie.