You are such a delusional fanatic, which is why you consider mainstream news to be conspiratorially, improvable theories, paranoia. You really think the world revolves around Jewish conspiracy theories don’t you Captain. That there are neo Nazi head hunters waiting for you in every closet, under your bed, and around every corner. And you call me delusional and paranoid?

Everything I mentioned was reported in mainstream news.

Further addddumbooo, it is obvious that US forces quickly secured the Iraqi oil, it has proven to be a major terrorist target.

Before the invasion, the US had already decided how to spend the oil money remember? How easily you forget Zionazi grand poo bah, Wolfowitz , telling Congress that the war would cost 50 billion and that Iraq’s oil would pay for it.

If the US have any intention whatsoever to bring security, freedom and democracy to Iraq, they would have also secured the banks, government buildings and hospitals.

When J Garmer, Bremmer’s predecessor arrives in Baghdad, (believing the crap about democracy and freedom), he gave a press conference talking about democracy and free and open elections. Rumsfeld got onto the phone to him immediately and told him not to unpack his bags, but take the next plane out of Iraq.

Bremmer disbanded the military and police force. He scrapped Iraq’s laws from top to bottom. He began the process to privatize all Iraq’s assets, and he turned Iraq into a tariff free trade zone.

All of which is entirely illegal under international law mind you.

These are historical facts Captain, but it is understandable that your pee brain would so easily go into overload.

This stuff is clearly a little too high brow for our resident village idiot.

your views are in the minority

A man that’s truly hilarious. Even in the US, 59% of people believe the war was a mistake. You call that a minority my mathematically challenged dufus?

Where do you get your statistics Captain? The little voices inside your head?

There is no point ever to argue with a conspiratorialist, only to point out the tell-tale signs: Unprovable theories, idosyncratic failure to reconcile anomalies, paranoia, hidden motives (usually involving Jews) and unique access to the truth.

Further addddumbooo, it is obvious that US forces quickly secured the Iraqi oil, it has proven to be a major terrorist target. It remains Iraq’s biggest asset and clearly it is in the Iraqi’s best interest that this is protected.

Addumbo, you can continue to engage in ad hominem attacks all you want. Whilst you have many fellow intellectually challenged paranoid islamist sympathisers here, your views are in the minority (outside of Iran).

When you next take a break and pull your head out of your arse, you might want to check the main stream news.

But even with your head up your arse, you manage to convice all that you are indeed a moron. How ever does he do it?

The Soviets used to do the same trick. Invade a country, then “elect” a new leader and insist that their troops remain at the behest of the leadership. An Islamist state would not tolerate the presence of a foreign army, much less a US occupying power.

Saddam’s rule has as much legitimacy as this one. He too held elections remember? Yes those elections were illegitimate, but then again, voters in Iraq by in large had no idea who they were voting for security reasons. You call that legitimate?

The Iraqi government is not in a state of transition, but is unsustainable. Any legitimate leadership, transitional or otherwise, would be able stand alone, without the presence of 150,000 US troops to keep them in power.

Only a complete moron would continue to maintain that the regime change forced upon Iraq was done for the benefit of the Iraqi people. The first thing the US did when invade was make a bee line for the oil ministry buildings, leaving everything else, including banks and government buildings, to be looted and ransacked. Iraqi’s laws were scrapped and re-written without the involvement of a single Iraqi.

Captain Cretin forgets that the Bush administration had no intention of allowing free and open elections, but rather to install their heir apparent, con man and fraud extraordinaire, Ahmed Chalabi. It was only because Sistani organized mass demonstrations by the Shia (which the US could not affords to piss off at the time) that the US blinked and agreed to have elections at all.

There are no personal freedoms in Iraq. People are having their homes invaded in the middle of the night by death squads or US forces. Babies and old men in wheel chairs are being shot just for being Iraqis. The residents of Ramadi are fleeing their city as we speak because the US intend forces are preparing to give it the Fallujah treatment. Who exactly is enjoying personal freedoms?

But being he Zionist that you are, it’s obvious that this is all the Arabs deserve right? So long as Israel can rest easy now that Saddam is out of the way.

adummmbo, did someone forget to tell you that Saddam was self appointed? Yes he was kicked out, but his rule had no legitimacy. He had no mandate beyond muscle and terrorised Iraq for decades.

The Iraqi government is not in a guest room but in a state of transition. This is obvious to all apart from ed (who seems have some sort of intellectual inferiority complex), anon, Ian and of course the class clown, addddummmmbooooo.

It always amazes me how the left can defend against regime change when these despotic regimes caused so much misery and incursion on personal freedoms. The new left agenda appears to be the denigration of democracy in order to facilitate the status quo with the worst world citizens. Oh, and Israel bashing of course.

Actually israel is not “reclaiming the dispossessed land of their Israelite forebears.”

Really, thats going to be news to a lot of people, especially the Zionists!

Israel is a legitimate nation-state

Says who?

The British, Americans and UN hierarchy, may have decided they have the right to steal someone elses land and give it to the descendants of a small tribe that once had a few settlements there, and despite the image people have, thats all Judea was in 70 AD, but that legitimacy is questionable.

If you accept that a few big players had that right then you must accept they have the right to steal your land and give it away to whomever they choose to!

That would have catapulted Iraq into stone-age collapse, and instated a psychopathic killer as the greatest Muslim soldier since Saladin

Cometimes oyu have to wonder if Hitch makes these grandiose historical references just becase he thinks someone ignorant of these players will be impressed. Hitch maintains that Saddam was like Stalin, only more crazy, even thought Saddam was responsible for the deaths of a fraction of the carnage that Stalin inflicted.

Nowhere is it mentioned that Bush had the opportunityt o take out Zarqawi on more than oen occasion, before the Iraq war, but decided not to proceed, because Zarqawi’s presence could be used to tie Saddam to Al Qaeda.

If a bar tender continues to serve someone who’s clearly drunk, that makes him responsible if that guy kills somene drivign home. The same can be said for Bush.

Christopher Hitchen’s has written an excellent article of the glorious demise of this pimp.

Poor Hitchens,

Another piece of garbage that tries desperately to convince his readers that killing Zarqawi was worth the 2400 dead Us servicenmen, the 100 thousand plus dead Iraqis and 300 billion plus in treasure.

Like so many of his neocon pack, Hitch used Zarqawi;s presence in Iraq as the glue to connect Saddam to Al Qaeda, and as a prized boogie man on whcih to pin the blame for just about anything that went wrong. Now he’s gone, they are going to have to explain why Zarqawi’s demise makes any difference whatsoever.

Back in April, the Christian Sciene Monitor published a piece that Zarqawi was already being disowned by Al Qaeda and others were predicting that Zarqawi would soon be turned in by one of his own.

Israel is a legitimate nation-state that its defending itself from tens of millions of crazed Islamofascists who have tried for the past 60 years to push all the Jews into the sea. Until they grow up and concede that they lost, things will not improve for these people.

Tens of millions? Lost? Thanks Viva for proing what an idiot you are.

The nation state to which you refere, clearly does not include the occupied territories. So I take it, you are in favor of withdrawl?

Actually israel is not “reclaiming the dispossessed land of their Israelite forebears.” Israel is a legitimate nation-state that its defending itself from tens of millions of crazed Islamofascists who have tried for the past 60 years to push all the Jews into the sea. Until they grow up and concede that they lost, things will not improve for these people.