<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding problems with dominance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/06/09/finding-problems-with-dominance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/06/09/finding-problems-with-dominance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/06/09/finding-problems-with-dominance/comment-page-1/#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/06/09/finding-problems-with-dominance/#comment-6046</guid>
		<description>The type of warfare described is meaningless. Do you win when you&#039;ve wiped out the opponents robots? No. The only thing that matters is dead &#039;real live&#039; bodies. America might have a few small victories initially, but their opponents will find ways of killing human Americans eventually. Just look at Iraq and Afghanistan. The CoW have vastly superior weapons and training, but they are still sending home 2 bodies a day. And the less risky you make war, the greater the psychological impact when you do loose someone.  
 
Nor is there anything such thing as an invincible/invulnerable weapon. No matter how brilliant their design, robot warriors will always have flaws. Weak spots. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The type of warfare described is meaningless. Do you win when you&#039;ve wiped out the opponents robots? No. The only thing that matters is dead &#039;real live&#039; bodies. America might have a few small victories initially, but their opponents will find ways of killing human Americans eventually. Just look at Iraq and Afghanistan. The CoW have vastly superior weapons and training, but they are still sending home 2 bodies a day. And the less risky you make war, the greater the psychological impact when you do loose someone. </p>
<p>Nor is there anything such thing as an invincible/invulnerable weapon. No matter how brilliant their design, robot warriors will always have flaws. Weak spots. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/06/09/finding-problems-with-dominance/comment-page-1/#comment-5971</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/06/09/finding-problems-with-dominance/#comment-5971</guid>
		<description>I think amost victims prefer death with the Russian or Chinese HUMAN touch.  
 
Bullet in back of skull. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think amost victims prefer death with the Russian or Chinese HUMAN touch. </p>
<p>Bullet in back of skull. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.antonyloewenstein.com

Served from: antonyloewenstein.com @ 2012-05-24 12:38:22 -->
