Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

The real agenda

The following letter appears in today’s Australian newspaper:

Elisabeth Wynhausen’s piece (“Careful, they might hear you“, Inquirer, 10-11/6) is rife with inaccuracies, contradictions and non sequiturs.

For example, she provides evidence that the policy positions of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council reflect the views of the majority of Australian Jewry. But then she expends most of the space in a transparent attempt to portray AIJAC’s advocacy as non-mainstream, wrong-headed, and somehow stifling of debate.

Further, Wynhausen implies that Jewish activists in Australia inappropriately brand critics of Israel as anti-Semitic but she provides not a single example.

As for claims we “bully” editors, AIJAC’s conversations with the media are not to prevent them publishing criticism of Israel but to encourage them to provide a balance by also running pieces explaining and giving sorely needed context to Israel’s actions.

Many groups in Australian society engage politicians, the media and others of influence. It is part of what makes us a democracy, and constitutes participation in debate, not its suppression. It is unfortunate that some see it as somehow sinister or inappropriate when Jews, and only when Jews, exercise this right.
Colin Rubenstein
Executive director, AIJAC

Rubenstein is being disingenuous. Nobody is suggesting Jews don’t have the right to lobby, agitate and promote their agenda. The issue is the ways in which it is done. As we’ve seen recently, Zionist lobbying regularly involves threats and vitriol, causing the opposite of the desired effect. Furthermore, more and more Jews are simply disengaging from the Zionist project. Rubenstein doesn’t have any answers to this dilemma, except stronger promotion of Israel’s exclusionary ideology.

  • captain

    This is a typical example of the projection. Ant has no tolerance at all for Rubenstein's views. He bullies Rubenstein and continually taunts and ridicules the Jewish lobby. It is Loewenstein who is the intolerant bully.

    Ant, don't you realise that you and your cohorts are making the same comments about Jews as all of the antisemites before you?

  • Progressive Atheist

    I saw Rubenstein on a recent Geoffrey Robertson "Hypothetical". Rubenstein is definitely the ugliest face of Australian Jewry.

  • Addamo

    Oh right Captain,

    So it's perfectly rasonable for Rubenstein to criticise and misreprensent Elisabeth Wynhausen, but it's not acceptable for Anthony to do the same to Rubenstein, is that it?

    Ant, don’t you realise that you and your cohorts are making the same comments about Jews as all of the antisemites before you?

    What about the comments made by Jewish groups against their critics or against pro Arab groups? I know, I know, gotta remember to factor in the moral exeltionalism here right?

  • Comical_Ali

    You (and other pro-Arab/Islamist activists) are everything that you accuse your detractors of and worse.

  • "It is Loewenstein who is the intolerant bully."

    Captain, where can I get some of your drugs?

  • captain

    Oh, so you think that Ant is tolerant of AIJAC and Rubenstein? Does Ant ever take any other lobby group to task? No? Funny that.

  • Addamo

    Does Ant ever take any other lobby group to task? No? Funny that.

    Funny? What's so funny about the obvious? What other lobby takes Ant to task Captain?

  • Comical_Ali

    To prove that more & more Jews are "disengaging from the zionist project" Antony links to a Guardain column by Max Hastings. And to call this column an incoherent ramble would simply be a gross understatement.

    Take Hasting's encounter with a reform "rabbi" (he uses his contact with the "rabbi" to back his entire thesis of his article) as an example –


    He (the sexually frustrated reform "rabbi") notes that while genealogy has become a popular enthusiasm of diaspora Jews, Israelis prefer archaeology, "pursuing the distant past to authenticate an ancient connection with the land" in the absence of any more recent claim.

    He tells a good story of returning on a boat from Israel to Marseilles in 1958, after a stint on a kibbutz. His efforts to make headway with pretty blond American passengers were thwarted by the presence of a tanned, muscular Israeli paratrooper, who effortlessly cut him out.

    Facist! of course I can empathise with the sexually frustrated "rabbi" because as you all know I had a similiar experience when an Israeli stole my love interest away from me. These smooth talking Israelis are so tall and handsome…got to be a world wide zionist conspiracy!

    When the boat stopped at Naples, this hero of Sinai announced that he was off to buy a watch. Beware of fakes, advised Goldberg, magnanimous in sexual defeat. The soldier ignored him, and was later seen hurling a worthless purchase into the sea.

    If we were talking about Christians here, it might be called a parable. Goldberg believes that Israel has allowed military prowess to blind it to wisdom: "the Jewish fox knows many things, the Jewish hedgehog only one big thing".

    Anyway I wont comment any further (the article speaks for itself) except say great work Antony, this "evidence" that you link to back up what you say certainly enchances your anti-Israel critique and adds to your credibility.

  • Comical_Ali

    Oh and sexual frustration aside…I'm still waiting for you to cite one case where someone was forced to cancel their lecture or go into police protection as a result of "zionist" bullying or better still get killed by "zionist" bullies.

    I guess we all have our own defintion of "bullying."

  • captain

    And of course, this wouldn't be bullying! You have to love those pals!!! And to think that Ant criticised Israel's reaction to pal relationships!!!!

  • captain

    oh, more bullying!! WHen these pals put their mind to something, you just can't shift them.

  • Addamo

    You want bullyin?

    Olmert: Israeli lives worth more than Palestinian ones

    I’m still waiting for you to cite one case where someone was forced to cancel their lecture or go into police protection as a result of “zionist” bullying or better still get killed by “zionist” bullies.,7340,L-3262657

  • captain

    Addumbo, these magical links are not a substitute for reality. It seems you aren't concerned at all about pal violence. Again and again and again.

  • Addamo

    No susbtitue for reality?

    Please tell me which of these stories is NOT real?

    It seems you aren’t concerned at all about pal violence.

    Not at all, but it ultimately comes down to who and how many are being killed doesn't it?

  • viva peace

    This article by Wynhausen is further evidence of the rabid anti-Israel stance of The Australian. WHY does it ever only publish JEWISH voices on these matters. American foreign policy and lobby groups are of interest to us all you know.

  • Addamo


    One can always tell that you have an angenda or somrhign to hide when you work so hard at playing dumb. There is no winning with you and your nerry men is there? If the wriiter had not been Jewsih, then there woudl have been a bvarrage of cries of anti-Semitism.

    Case in point, the first response to the original thread was from Captain:

    She has form. She is afraid of the evil joooish lobby.

    How does this article contradict your stemement of the obvious that "American foreign policy and lobby groups are of interest to us all"?

  • Addamo

    Speaking of target practice, here's a plum example of putting high tech weaponry to good use.

    The IDF is so far up the food chain these days it has machines do the bombing and killing for them. No point in getting one's hands dirty is there? Bet Richard Perle woudl love some of these UAV to test run in Iran.