Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

What’s Israel’s real agenda?

The following article appears in today’s edition of Crikey:

Antony Loewenstein, blogger, journalist and author of the forthcoming My Israel Question:

Israel’s war against Hamas and Hezbollah is the latest sign of a US-backed client state that is truly out of control. The abduction of three Israeli soldiers in the last weeks was the supposed catalyst for the latest upsurge in violence, but we should be under no illusion as to the real agenda. The Jewish state aims to redesign the Middle East through the barrel of a gun, imposing its will through the killing of civilians and destruction of civilian infrastructure. The result will be the strengthening of both Hamas and Hezbollah, and rising stature of Syria and Iran.

Haaretz writer Gideon Levy despaired yesterday that Israel had undertaken a “war of choice”. “The IDF [Israel Defence Force] absorbed two painful blows, which were particularly humiliating”, he wrote, “and in their wake went into a war that is all about restoring its lost dignity, which on our side is called ‘restoring deterrent capabilities.’”

Israeli, Palestinian and Lebanese civilians are the victims of an Israeli defence establishment that still believes, despite decades of policy failure, that “terrorists” must be liquidated in every corner of the region, whatever the political cost. Isi Leibler, former head of Australia’s Zionist lobby, recently argued in the Jerusalem Post that, “the responsibility for casualties, even innocent bystanders, will rest entirely with the terrorists and the Palestinian leaders who enable them to carry out their barbaric acts. And if by doing so we will create a new wave of international anti-Israeli condemnation, so be it.”

This arrogance can only breed because of seemingly open-ended US support, a situation that is unsustainable due to the growing political strength of the US Arab and Muslim populations. The clock is ticking on the blank cheque offered to every Israeli manoeuvre, no matter how provocative or illegal.

Australia, not unlike many other Western nations, still sees Israel as the plucky, defenceless nation in the heart of a dangerous Middle East. It is an illusion that holds no credibility. A negotiated settlement to the current crisis should be a priority, the release of untold number of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails – many of whom are arrested and never even face court – and cessation of cross-border, state terrorism.

The uncontrolled policies of the Israeli government should now be seen as a danger to enlightened citizens and governments across the globe.

10 comments ↪
  • boredinHK

    "The Jewish state aims to redesign the Middle East through the barrel of a gun, imposing its will through the killing of civilians and destruction of civilian infrastructure. The result will be the strengthening of both Hamas and Hezbollah, and rising stature of Syria and Iran."

    Could we get a few thoughts on the redesign ?

    Syria to get a new leader ? Iran to be bombed ?

    Lebanon to hold fresh elections within 3 months ?

    Anything?

  • JohD

    There is no blueprint, only madness in the method. The idea is to achieve politicide, since no Arab leader, of whatever ideology, can champion the Israeli cause. So no leader is to emerge, except those that don't care a hoot about western public opinion and who can be demonised as savages. The hope is that from the chaos, a stronger Israel will emerge. It is an insane strategy, and the last roll of the dice for Israel. The theory is that the Arabs are so backward that they are unable to devise tactics that can inflict reall damage to Israel. How wrong they are, Israel will find itself in a cauldron from which it will never emerge.

    I think Anthony is wrong, although they are allies, Israel does not take orders from the US. This propensity to blame the US for all Israel's atrocities seems to be the prevailing thesis amongst Chomsky adherents. It is probably residual ethnocentrism, but hardly a fatal sin. Someone has to stand up for the Jews, and personnally, rather them than the unreconstructed Racist Israel uber alles crowd.

  • smiths

    well to say there is no blue print is naive at best,
    take for example this 1996 document

    on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000,

    Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by:

    * striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan.

    * paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.

    * striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.

    http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm

    of course the issue of syrian targets in lebanon was removed with the hariri assasination which syria obviously commited because they wanted to totally screw up there position in lebanon and increase they're chances of being obliterated by america

    it is influenced and predated by

    A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s

    The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.
    The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony.

    http://cgi.stanford.edu/group/wais/cgi-bin/index…. http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/zionism

  • smiths

    and of course that doesnt cover the attempts to provoke syria and iran,

    isnt it obvious enough, iran does not want war with america or israel,
    america is doing everything it can with its special friend israel to create war with iran,

    you would have to have a viewpoint so warped as to be deranged not to be able to see this from western media coverage,

    and listening to the likes of captain and viva peace is like seeing the adoring cheering crowds on the side of the road as the nazis parade past, on the way to attack everyone because they're culture and values were better

  • Captain

    Hmmm what could be Israel's agenda. Could it be to wipe out its 600 million neighbours? Or could it be to live in peace. No that would be too simple and it lacks a conspiracy. Only conspiracies carry any weight here.

  • boredinHK

    Smiths , thanks ,another great article in the http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm link.

    No amount or military victories will ensure peace ? Weird,sort of mystical thinking .

    I'm not sure the mullahs in Tehran won't risk a limited military engagement . Solidifies their backing , exposes the weakness of the other if the ruling elite survive and as a stategy it is tried and true rulers in many different places.

    I'm also thinking the Haaretz articles about it being a cover to delay action on the nuclear issue may have some validity .Very risky plan of course.

  • Addamo_01

    Captain Maggot is at it again,

    Could it be to wipe out its 600 million neighbours?

    Or could it be to live in peace.

    Isrfael has never wanted peace, becasue it was never willing to pay the price for peace.

    No that would be too simple and it lacks a conspiracy. Only conspiracies carry any weight here.

    Israel's actions speak louder than words. They bombed the beach in Gaza and lied aboit it. They atatcked Hamas under teh guide of resuing an IDF soldeir, but noen of their actions are consistent with a rescue mission.

    They attacked Lebanon, then Hezbollah captures 2 more IDf soldiers adn now Israel is arguing that it is destroying Lebanon becase of the capture of those soldiers. Another proveable lie.

    Pull your head out of your arse Captain.

  • Adam

    I so agree with the comments made on this topic (apart from Captain) and I can’t believe people usually classify these reports as conspiracy theories when in fact they make more sense when you see the same reports actually being put into place.

    Like take for example Iraq, before 9/11 which created the perfect foundation to get the “long war into action, in reshaping Middle East” there were reports emerging that George W Bush coming into power would mean completing the work his farther had started. Anyway the reports before 9/11 circulating was that Israel had regional enemies and their most deadly from the list (of Arab countries) was Iraq.

    The reports indicated that to diminish the treat from Iraq, Iraq would need to be divided into 3 states, North would be for the Kurdish, the middle would be for Sunni population and the South would be for the Shias. Well today we see that taking shape by Sunni fighting with the north and south in practically a civil war. A civil war is needed before the leaders are pushed into defining Iraq into 3 states once again (just like a World War was needed to break the Ottoman Empire into mini states, weakening the threat from a long time enemy called Islam).

    So, what an excuse Israel has (supported wholeheartedly by the western powers) to win public support from the western nations in thinking that Israel is the poor country which is fighting for its very existence. The reality is far from it. Iraq does not even have a Police force let alone an International army, it cannot control the affairs in its own back garden let alone attack Israel now. So Iraq is practically ticked off from the Israel enemy list. Who’s next?

    Attacking Iran and Syria is not that simple as one of these two countries are next on this enemy list, but indirectly dragging them in will always work. Today’s news reports keep emphasizing that the weapons arsenal Hezbollah have are given by Syria or Iran, well what about the arsenal Israel has? Has that not come from America to be used at Israel’s will on the Muslims? So just like Israel is hating Iran and Syria likewise people of the Arab nation are hating Israel and America for a joint effort in reshaping the Arab land once again after World War I and II.

    No one can predict every step of this recent deliberate war started by Israel, but one can be sure that its not just about Israel soldiers being kidnapped but rather a perfect excuse to set yet again new foundations which will change the Middle East once again.

    If it has taken couple of Israel soldiers to be captured for this war to have started, how simple do you think it will be to drag Iran and Syria into this conflict? This conflict is World War 2.5 (without Syria and Iran) but very soon it will become World War 3.

    I guess by destroying Lebanon (and its entire infrastructure) maybe some miracle way in eliminate Hezbollah or at least from Israel and western view point. The current action from Israel (and its supporters) will only increase the urge for the Muslims to re-establish an Islamic State with one nation (much like Ottoman Empire) which was at least more secure than the current situation that the divided Muslim nations face.

    To the author of this article/blog keep up the good work, and I will be sending my mates your blog url as I find it very interesting indeed.

  • Addamo_01

    The price for peace has been laid bare – territory – my Zinazi fascist maggot.

    Israel is not defending itself. It is the Lebanese who are being evacuated, not Israel. It is Lebanon being destroyed nto Israel.

    Since when does defending Israel include ordering 20 villages to leave their homes then as they are leaving, have an Israeli F-16 bomb the convoy and incinerate the occupants. That's pure, outright and wanton murder – and boy you are so enjoying it aren't you Captain?

    Israel should declare it;s borders if it really wants to defend them – but then again, maybe Israel considers Gaza and Lebanon to reside within those borders.

  • Addamo_01

    Welcom Adam,

    Good to have you here. Ignore Captain – he's a mentally deranged patient who refuses to take his medicatino , but he is entertaining.