just a few words to add to the vocabulary of some of the posts on Antony's blog – thought the others used were not offensive enough!

Oh, just for the benefit of our racist, sexist, homophobic Jew-hating Jews posting here, maybe "poofter", "lezzo" need to be included.

Amazing how offensive some people can be without even trying!

Keep up the good work!

But don't forget to tell us when you are leaving to join the IDF – they are losing a few, and replacements are urgently needed from the diaspora! They need you, and they need you NOW! After all, there are still about 6 million left outside Israel (ah yes, just the number Hitler killed – but maybe many of this six million, mainly the zionists – don't really like the idea of a slow boat to Israel!)

But their peoples are not. And once a people have lost their terror, they cannot be re-injected with fear.

Is this just a confirmation that the Muslims (or Arabs) were subjected to terrorism (much like the west who insist they have been subjected to terrorism), and if they were by whom, the west?

..And why would someone (or some nation) would want the whole Arab states (and its nations) to have fear of the west? Is this statement just a confirmation of western sponsored terrorism in the Middle East via Israel on the Muslims and Christians living there?

So really 9/11 was a reaction from the western action, which would mean the reaction was fair (much like how the west see Israel war crimes in Lebanon as fair, since this too is a reaction?).

This is sad.

When people elect terrorists to represent them, they can hardly then cry when their infrastructure suddenly gets bombed.

Well in addition to the obvious case of Israeli's, that also makes the populations of the USA, Britain and Australia completely fair game one's to assume?

I gather I won't have to endure any more unjustified bleating about 9/11, the London bombings or the Bali bombings, nor any future acts if this ilk in that case…they simply had it coming.

Oh, hang on…what if I didn't vote for Howard?

Aug 6th, 2006 at 10:33 pm

The U.S. press and blogosphere is awash with neocon-inspired calls for indefinite shooting, no talking and extension of hostilities to Syria and Iran, with Gingrich calling this a third world war to “defend civilization.”

Hey, this is like being a teenager asking the old man for 20 bucks for a movie (yeah right) he gives you 200, a wink and a nod, "Have a good time son, get yourself a little pussy, don't worry about what time to get home, if the cops give you any trouble I'll deal with it- enjoy yourself!"

they should turn their attention to destroying a non state sanctioned armed militia that is against international law

So if they are state sanctioned, they get to stay right? The way Hezbollah's popularity is headed, they may soon be in charge.

Given their propensity to passivity in the face of the PLO destroying their country and then Hezbollah doing the same

Oops, you left out Israel, and no, Hezbollah has not destroyed Lebanon.

When Syria does finally leave Lebanon and Iran stops meddling, there are great prospects for harmony on the northern border.

Syria has left Lebanon. It may have intelligence oepratives there, but then, we know Missad has been there too because they were receintly caught by Lebanese authorities.

So your question is about as relevant as asking whether a man can get pregnant from sex

its not a matter of likelyhood, i know that lebanon will not invade israel. this is a matter of what you would think if lebanon DID invade israel under the pretence of selfdefense and killed hundreds of israeli civilians in the process… so the question remains.

The U.S. press and blogosphere is awash with neocon-inspired calls for indefinite shooting, no talking and extension of hostilities to Syria and Iran, with Gingrich calling this a third world war to "defend civilization."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintA…

The destabilization of Lebanon is designed to spill violence across the border into Syria, thus justifying an Israeli-U.S. strike on that country.

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
(July 30, 2006)

The recent attack on Qaa in far north Lebanon is the most recent attempt at provocation of Syria. Qaa is on the Syrian border, and all those killed were Syrian workers.

In other news:

One of the reasons Israel is attacking Christian targets in Lebanon is to show its opposition to the tactical agreement between the FPM and Hezbollah. The attacks on Christian targets are a way to punish Israel's one-time allies. The FPM, as well as most other Lebanese political parties, are also acutely aware of Israeli and American involvement in a series of "false flag" assassinations of Lebanese politicians and journalists in order to stir up resentment against Syria.

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
(Aug. 3, 2006)

Harmony? .Border? There will never be harmony until all Arabs have been killed – you know that, and the Issies are just the boys to do it, they find it really quite easy.