Really? I don;t recall ever asking for something like that. But as I have allegedly done so “often” perhaps you can post one of those requests to refresh my memory.

Viva,

right after you finally post an example of how me and addamo are holocaust deniers and anti-semites.

Viva,

You have have often asked for an example of University academics beign censored with regards to Israel…

Really? I don;t recall ever asking for something like that. But as I have allegedly done so "often" perhaps you can post one of those requests to refresh my memory.

You have have often asked for an example of University academics beign censored with regards to Israel. Well, here is an extreme an example as you are ever likely to come across.

This is the kind fo news no doubt that Danby dreams about. Wha's sfightens Danby is not that the subject is being discussed at all. Already, peopel are openly debating whether Zionism is on par with islamofascism.

I guess this makes me anti-Semitic for mentioning it right?

Douglas Giles is a recent casualty. He used to teach a class on world religions at Roosevelt University, Chicago, founded in memory of FDR and his liberal-inclined wife, Eleanor. Last year, Giles was ordered by his head of department, art historian Susan Weininger, not to allow students to ask questions about Palestine and Israel; in fact, nothing was to be mentioned in class, textbooks and examinations that could possibly open Judaism to criticism

Leaving aside his boss’s doubtful qualifications to set limits on a class of comparative religion – her speciality is early 20th-century Midwestern artists such as Tunis Ponsen (nor have I) – the point to grasp is that Professor Giles did not make inflammatory statements himself: he merely refused to limit debate among the young minds in front of him.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1…

Everyone is entitled to ask questions and dissent on middle eastern politics except, er, er, er JEWS!

Viva you knob, I'm not sure if you've been under a rock your entire life but Israeli opinion has dominated the entire debate for most of the engagement between palistinians and israelis.

You are absolutely right, dissent and questioning should be allowed, tell that to Danby and AIJAC who insist that nobody should listen to these questions and dissent because its just downright anti-semitic, which ofcourse is the morons way to dodge a question.

If its so anti-semitic viva, and your so against anti-semitism, how about you tackle the anti-semitic arguement and prove it wrong rather than whinging about it being anti-semitic.

None the less, in regards to Danby, he is a public servant and as such I think you should all follow AIJAC's lead and exercise your freedom of speech, send good ol' danby an email or 3, get your friends who care to do the same and let him know how disgraceful he is as a politician for a democratic society.

How many more than "one" respect? Two, three, elenty-four? Could you share with is what this "one' is? And why is it dangerous? Then compare that to these respects of our dangerous climate that you are tracking.