<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family feud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:00:30 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M.Mayes</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11769</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11769</guid>
		<description>captain you narrow minded twit, that statement wasnt talking about the palestinians reasons for bombing, Ron would obviously like to see Israel stop being attacked, the point was, since you so blatently missed it, that his opinions are narrowminded and that he couldnt seriously expect to have peace aswell as those thoughts. They are incompatible.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I hardly think his cousin’s views are relevant to any serious academic exploration of these issues. This just highlights Ant’s appalling methodology. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sounds kind of like the VAST majority of everything you ever post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>captain you narrow minded twit, that statement wasnt talking about the palestinians reasons for bombing, Ron would obviously like to see Israel stop being attacked, the point was, since you so blatently missed it, that his opinions are narrowminded and that he couldnt seriously expect to have peace aswell as those thoughts. They are incompatible.</p>
<blockquote><p>I hardly think his cousin’s views are relevant to any serious academic exploration of these issues. This just highlights Ant’s appalling methodology. </p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds kind of like the VAST majority of everything you ever post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11758</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11758</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does he think that the Palestinians are likely to stop bombing his country whilst he holds those opinions?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh no, they should continue to bomb Israel &lt;i&gt;because of &lt;b&gt;his&lt;/b&gt; opinions&lt;/i&gt;. Hmmm, bombing because of Ron Green&#039;s opinions, a new level of absurdity has been reached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does he think that the Palestinians are likely to stop bombing his country whilst he holds those opinions?</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh no, they should continue to bomb Israel <i>because of <b>his</b> opinions</i>. Hmmm, bombing because of Ron Green&#8217;s opinions, a new level of absurdity has been reached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11756</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11756</guid>
		<description>I hardly think his cousin&#039;s views are relevant to any serious academic exploration of these issues. This just highlights Ant&#039;s appalling methodology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hardly think his cousin&#8217;s views are relevant to any serious academic exploration of these issues. This just highlights Ant&#8217;s appalling methodology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.Mayes</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11747</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11747</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ah the conversation was being recorded by his relative. Please make sure you bring this to ant’s attention.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

After reading the article, I really fail to see your point in posting it. It was exactly what Loewenstein posted here plus a little more at the end that didnt really back up any view I can imagine you holding captain.

No doubt you havent read the book Captain, but it was in the section of Loewenstein&#039;s journey to Israel and Palestine, it is relavent as an experience of that journey.

It was also quite relavent to show Ron&#039;s rather extreme view to show that some people do think like that even in Israel, right where it&#039;s all happening. It raises all sorts of questions and promotes discussion. Does Ron serious think with that attitude that peace is attainable? (short of squashing the palestinians), Does he think that the Palestinians are likely to stop bombing his country whilst he holds those opinions?

Here&#039;s your chance to engage in some real discussion captain, Do you disagree with the statements Ron made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ah the conversation was being recorded by his relative. Please make sure you bring this to ant’s attention.</p></blockquote>
<p>After reading the article, I really fail to see your point in posting it. It was exactly what Loewenstein posted here plus a little more at the end that didnt really back up any view I can imagine you holding captain.</p>
<p>No doubt you havent read the book Captain, but it was in the section of Loewenstein&#8217;s journey to Israel and Palestine, it is relavent as an experience of that journey.</p>
<p>It was also quite relavent to show Ron&#8217;s rather extreme view to show that some people do think like that even in Israel, right where it&#8217;s all happening. It raises all sorts of questions and promotes discussion. Does Ron serious think with that attitude that peace is attainable? (short of squashing the palestinians), Does he think that the Palestinians are likely to stop bombing his country whilst he holds those opinions?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s your chance to engage in some real discussion captain, Do you disagree with the statements Ron made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11718</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11718</guid>
		<description>no you are right it is establishing the fact before they can be argued. I mean why are the Green&#039;s representative of anyone at all? of what relevance are their views in a serious debate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no you are right it is establishing the fact before they can be argued. I mean why are the Green&#8217;s representative of anyone at all? of what relevance are their views in a serious debate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addamo_01</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11710</link>
		<dc:creator>Addamo_01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11710</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why does it need to be clarified?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Captain wil argue next that Ant&#039;s relatives should have had a lawyer present during all relevant discussions, otherwise their rights have been violated.

Notice how none of this discussion has anyting to do with arguing the facts in the book?   Who is surprised?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why does it need to be clarified?</p></blockquote>
<p>Captain wil argue next that Ant&#8217;s relatives should have had a lawyer present during all relevant discussions, otherwise their rights have been violated.</p>
<p>Notice how none of this discussion has anyting to do with arguing the facts in the book?   Who is surprised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Squire</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11706</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Squire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11706</guid>
		<description>Captain Aug 20th, 2006 at 6:16 pm 
&lt;blockquote&gt;There is nothing wrong with doing this if all parties are consenting to the process. And that is something that needs to be clarrified. &lt;/blockquote&gt;WQhy does it need to be clarified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain Aug 20th, 2006 at 6:16 pm </p>
<blockquote><p>There is nothing wrong with doing this if all parties are consenting to the process. And that is something that needs to be clarrified. </p></blockquote>
<p>WQhy does it need to be clarified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addamo_01</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11705</link>
		<dc:creator>Addamo_01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11705</guid>
		<description>J.F. Beck is a right wing Tim Blair useful idiot (alog with posters from TB
s blog) who is bound to distrot this story to be pro Israel.  And maybe we should also use these standards to Mel Gibson&#039;s rant.  After all, his rights were vilated were thery not when his comments were publicised.  But in the case of antisemitism, there are no barriers to privacy are there.

Here are some of the delightful opinions Ant&#039;s relatives had to share:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Germany is the devil. I&#039;ve never been there and never will. And my children, luckily, share the same view.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;You can&#039;t be pro-Palestinian without being anti-Israel. But you can be be Pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve never read in the Israeli press any incitement or hatred of Arabs. Never.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;We should be harder on the Palestinians... Only force will make them understand.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The world hates Jews and hates Israel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t care if the Palestinians are suffering. We must come first.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;The checkpoints, the wall and bypass roads are all necessary...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t know of any Arab or Palestinian academic or protester or individual, except for a few, that don&#039;t hate Israel and Jews.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.F. Beck is a right wing Tim Blair useful idiot (alog with posters from TB<br />
s blog) who is bound to distrot this story to be pro Israel.  And maybe we should also use these standards to Mel Gibson&#8217;s rant.  After all, his rights were vilated were thery not when his comments were publicised.  But in the case of antisemitism, there are no barriers to privacy are there.</p>
<p>Here are some of the delightful opinions Ant&#8217;s relatives had to share:</p>
<blockquote><p>Germany is the devil. I&#8217;ve never been there and never will. And my children, luckily, share the same view.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>You can&#8217;t be pro-Palestinian without being anti-Israel. But you can be be Pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve never read in the Israeli press any incitement or hatred of Arabs. Never.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>We should be harder on the Palestinians&#8230; Only force will make them understand.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
The world hates Jews and hates Israel.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t care if the Palestinians are suffering. We must come first.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The checkpoints, the wall and bypass roads are all necessary&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
I don&#8217;t know of any Arab or Palestinian academic or protester or individual, except for a few, that don&#8217;t hate Israel and Jews.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11696</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11696</guid>
		<description>Ah the conversation was being recorded by his relative. Please make sure you &lt;a href=&quot;http://rwdb.blogspot.com/2006/08/blood-feud.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bring this&lt;/a&gt; to ant&#039;s attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah the conversation was being recorded by his relative. Please make sure you <a href="http://rwdb.blogspot.com/2006/08/blood-feud.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/rwdb.blogspot.com/2006/08/blood-feud.html?referer=');">bring this</a> to ant&#8217;s attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.Mayes</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2006/08/19/family-feud/comment-page-1/#comment-11693</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Mayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/08/19/family-feud/#comment-11693</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh, and quiet? Its because Ant censors most of my posts. Simple as that. He does not tolerate dissent&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&#039;And why should we believe your version of events&#039;

Your bitching about cencorship is dissent itself, as someone said before why would ant delete your posts (unless they went against the comment rules) and not delete the ones claiming he deleted them.

&lt;blockquote&gt;nice evasion of my questions yet again &lt;/blockquote&gt;

ok we have now evaded 1 of your questions, 200 more and we should be even I reckon
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Did they know they were fodder for your book? Why should we accept your version of what transpired?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because there would be absolutely no point in Ant putting views against his own (ie. his uncles, or whoever it was) in his book, because the piece the relative wrote at the begining of this thread would suggest that his views were along those lines. Even if ant was to lie in the book about it, to what end? the other option being his relative actually agreed with him (which seems somewhat more benefitial than his dissent).


also if you are so concerned about posts being deleted, copy them to a word doc beforehand so you can repost them later when your whinging about it, then maybe we can engage with the (no-doubt) meaningless drivel that you normally write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh, and quiet? Its because Ant censors most of my posts. Simple as that. He does not tolerate dissent</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8216;And why should we believe your version of events&#8217;</p>
<p>Your bitching about cencorship is dissent itself, as someone said before why would ant delete your posts (unless they went against the comment rules) and not delete the ones claiming he deleted them.</p>
<blockquote><p>nice evasion of my questions yet again </p></blockquote>
<p>ok we have now evaded 1 of your questions, 200 more and we should be even I reckon</p>
<blockquote><p>
Did they know they were fodder for your book? Why should we accept your version of what transpired?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because there would be absolutely no point in Ant putting views against his own (ie. his uncles, or whoever it was) in his book, because the piece the relative wrote at the begining of this thread would suggest that his views were along those lines. Even if ant was to lie in the book about it, to what end? the other option being his relative actually agreed with him (which seems somewhat more benefitial than his dissent).</p>
<p>also if you are so concerned about posts being deleted, copy them to a word doc beforehand so you can repost them later when your whinging about it, then maybe we can engage with the (no-doubt) meaningless drivel that you normally write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
