Don’t ignore the nutters

Frank Rich comforts himself in the New York Times:

Whichever candidate or party lands in the White House, this much is certain: Inauguration Day 2009 is at the very least Armageddon for the reigning ayatollahs of the American right.

Really? This is a dangerous delusion not borne out by the facts. One example will suffice (and there are hundreds more.) Republican hopeful Rudy Giuliani has an advisor, Peter Berkowitz, a George Mason law professor. His thoughts on the Israel/Palestine conflict are about trying to force Arabs to breed less, therefore reducing the chance that Jews will soon be outnumbered in Israel and Palestine.

Outright racism, in other words. Rich may be talking about the religious right and its fundamentalist attitude to gays, but on a host of other key issues, their power remains strong (on both sides of the aisle.)

Divided they may be, but don’t rule them out.

no comments

Why can’t we hear them?

The Walkley Magazine is Australia’s leading media publication discussing trends, issues and controversies.

In the latest edition, I have an article that highlights the rise of blogging around the world and the tendency of Western media to avoid highlighting these new voices because of racism and ignorance:

Walkley Mag PDF Image

no comments

What the authorities don’t like

My Iranian blogger comrade, Kamangir, lives in Canada and writes almost daily on the repression suffered by many of his countrymen and women back home.

For this “crime”, he has now been slammed by conservative forces in Iran, surely a sign he is having an effect.

In solidarity.

2 comments

Iran is not a threat

International Atomic Energy Agency chairman Mohammed ElBaradei on Iran:

I have not received any information that there is a concrete, active nuclear weapon program going on right now. … We have information that there have been maybe some studies about possible weaponization. But we are looking into these alleged studies with Iran right now. … But have we seen having the nuclear material that can be readily used into a weapon? No. Have we seen an active weaponization program? No. So there is a concern, but there is also time to clarify these concerns.

one comment

Do you want censorship with that?

Internet repression isn’t only happening in Iran, China and Syria. Italy, over to you:

Though it never made the ‘big’ news, Italy’s latest foray into the blogosphere is indicative of some rather strange thinking from their leaders. Prime Minister Romano Prodi’s undersecretary Franco Levi composed the text to a law that requires anyone with a website or blog to register with the ROC (register of the Communication Authority). Site and blog owners will also be required to submit documentation, pay a tax and provide a letter of intent as to making any money. The law could effectively stifle any blog or other website that does not to the political line or else.

no comments

Two sides to blame

Kenneth Roth, Haaretz, October 28:

The way a government or armed group responds to a Human Rights Watch report says a lot about its willingness to curb abuses. Does it grapple seriously with the findings or simply dismiss them? Human Rights Watch encountered a bit of each when we recently released reports on why civilians died during Israel’s 2006 war with Hezbollah.

Our report on Hezbollah’s rocket attacks on northern Israel addressed Hezbollah’s two asserted justifications: that it was aiming only at military targets and, somewhat contradictorily, that insofar as it targeted civilians, it was in reprisal for Israeli misconduct. Human Rights Watch’s detailed investigation in northern Israel demonstrated that while at times Hezbollah did aim at military targets, frequently it aimed at civilian areas with no military target in sight. The report also emphasized the laws-of-war prohibition of attacks against civilians for any reason, even as ostensible reprisal.

Hezbollah did not want people to hear this message. Calling Human Rights Watch a “biased organization,” its Al-Manar television station rallied its supporters to protest outside the Beirut hotel where we had planned to hold a press conference to release the report, forcing the hotel to cancel the event. A lawyer sympathetic to Hezbollah even convinced a prosecutor to investigate the Human Rights Watch researcher in Beirut for treason. The report still got massive press attention – all the more so as “the report that Hezbollah tried to censor” – but Hezbollah’s response hardly showed a willingness to correct its lawless ways.

no comments

Morality, Israeli style

Cutting off electricity supplies to Gaza is just the latest attempt by Israel to inspire the world and highlight its Jewish values. The thinking?

Indeed, we always wanted to be a light unto the nations, but there are some cases where darkness can also prove beneficial.

In other words, Israel can commit war crimes because we’re Israel and the Palestinians are terrorists. Therefore, we are moral and they are not.

no comments

Head says yes, body says no

Lesson number 2521 in journalism:

Never trust a New York Times columnist, such as David Brooks, who regularly meets with the US President and believes, after reading his body language, that he won’t attack Iran.

Yes, he’s paid for these “insights.”

no comments

Easy solidarity

John Pilger, speaking this week to a PEN meeting in London to honour the dissidents in Burma:

The news is no more from Burma. The young monks are quiet in their cells, or they are dead. But words have escaped: the defiant, beautiful poetry of Aung Than and Zeya Aung; and we know of the unbroken will of the journalist U Win Tin, who makes ink out of brick powder on the walls of his prison cell and writes with a pen made from a bamboo mat – at the age of 77. These are the bravest of the brave.

What honour they bring to humanity with their struggle; and what shame they bring to those whose hypocrisy and silence helps to feed the monster that rules Burma.

When I began to write this, I had planned to quote a moving passage from my last interview with Aung San Suu Kyi, but I decided not to – because of something Suu Kyi said to me when I last spoke to her. “Be careful of media fashion,” she said. “The media like this sentimental version of life that reduces everything down to personality. Too often this can be a distraction.”

I thought about that, and how typically self effacing it was, and how right she was. For the greatest distraction is the hypocrisy of those political figures in the democratic West, who claim to support the Burmese liberation struggle. Laura Bush and Condaleeza Rice come to mind. “The United States,” said Rice, “is determined to keep an international focus on the travesty that is taking place in Burma.” What she is less keen to keep a focus on is that the huge American company, Chevron, on whose board of directors she sat, is part of a consortium with the junta and the French company, Total, that operates in Burma’s offshore oil fields. The gas from these fields is exported through a pipeline that was built with forced labour and whose construction involved Halliburton, of which Vice President Cheney was Chief Executive.

no comments

Isolating those in need

Israel’s real agenda in Gaza? Haaretz explains (despite the wishes of Zionist lobbyists in the US, who just wish those anti-Israel Haaretz journalists would keep their mouths shut and show public solidarity with the Jewish state):

There is an enormous gap between the reasons Israel is giving for the decision to impose significant sanctions against Hamas rule in the Gaza Strip, and the real intentions behind them. Defense Minister Ehud Barak authorized Thursday a plan for disrupting electricity supply to the Gaza Strip, as well as significantly shrinking fuel shipments. This is supposed to reduce the number of Qassam rocket attacks against Sderot and the other border communities. In practice, defense officials believe that the Palestinian militants will intensify their attacks in response to the sanctions.

As such, the real aim of this effort is twofold: to attempt a new form of “escalation” as a response to aggression from Gaza, before Israel embarks on a major military operation there; and to prepare the ground for a more clear-cut isolation of the Gaza Strip – limiting to an absolute minimum Israel’s obligation toward the Palestinians there.

no comments

The moment of death

In 1995, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was murdered by a religious, Jewish fanatic (and today, far-right Jewish groups regard Rabin’s killer as a hero.) Enhanced video of that fateful night has recently surfaced:

one comment

We know heaps about gulags

The Decider speaks:

“The socialist paradise [Cuba] is a tropical gulag.”

Oh, the irony.

A few years ago, Amnesty head Irene Khan called Guantanamo Bay, the US base in Cuba, the “gulag of our times.”

Yes, Bush believes in human rights, freedom and democracy. Shame about the over one million dead in Iraq.

no comments