<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you say so&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonyloewenstein.com/2009/03/26/if-you-say-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2009/03/26/if-you-say-so/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:17:25 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ej</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/2009/03/26/if-you-say-so/comment-page-1/#comment-505872</link>
		<dc:creator>ej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/?p=9865#comment-505872</guid>
		<description>Foxman is a fuckwit. Testament to how zionism destroys the mind&#039;s faculties.
Nationalism is a complex beast, which explains why long shelves in the libraries are devoted to it.
Alternatively progressive (think of the &#039;nations&#039; escaping the heel of the grand empires - Austro-Hungarian, Russian/Soviet, etc.) and regressive, with the latter indeed feeding partly on racism.
But here is Foxman again equating Jews to English and French. A regular canard. 
The English are not a race, an ethnicity (nor a group unified by religion); the English are a mongrel breed united by nationality. Ditto the French. Etc. 
So where does this leave the Jews? They&#039;re English, French themselves. Then why Israel?
Actually, Jews themselves are a mongrel breed, but we won&#039;t get into that. Who is a Jew, and what is the point of the classification? There&#039;s only so much intelligence that Foxman et al can take for one day.
Interesting in passing that Foxman mentions &#039;Palestinian nationalism&#039;. This must have been a slip. If Foxman admits to the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism along with that of the English and the French, well sayonara the Jewish state as presently constituted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foxman is a fuckwit. Testament to how zionism destroys the mind&#8217;s faculties.<br />
Nationalism is a complex beast, which explains why long shelves in the libraries are devoted to it.<br />
Alternatively progressive (think of the &#8216;nations&#8217; escaping the heel of the grand empires &#8211; Austro-Hungarian, Russian/Soviet, etc.) and regressive, with the latter indeed feeding partly on racism.<br />
But here is Foxman again equating Jews to English and French. A regular canard.<br />
The English are not a race, an ethnicity (nor a group unified by religion); the English are a mongrel breed united by nationality. Ditto the French. Etc.<br />
So where does this leave the Jews? They&#8217;re English, French themselves. Then why Israel?<br />
Actually, Jews themselves are a mongrel breed, but we won&#8217;t get into that. Who is a Jew, and what is the point of the classification? There&#8217;s only so much intelligence that Foxman et al can take for one day.<br />
Interesting in passing that Foxman mentions &#8216;Palestinian nationalism&#8217;. This must have been a slip. If Foxman admits to the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism along with that of the English and the French, well sayonara the Jewish state as presently constituted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
