The following article is written by Israeli/American peace activist Jeff Halper for the Australian Jewish News but the paper refuses to run the piece, despite spending weeks attacking Halper and his supporters in its pages:
The uproar in the organized Jewish community over the prospect of my speaking in Australia is truly startling to an Israeli like me. Granted, I am very critical of Israel’s policies of Occupation and doubt whether a two-state solution is still possible given the extent of Israel’s settlements, but this hardly warrants the kind of demonization I received in the pages of The AJN. Opinions similar to mine are readily available in the mainstream Israeli media. Indeed, I myself write frequently for the Israeli press and appear regularly on Israeli TV and radio.
Why, then, the hysteria? Why was I banned from Temple Emmanuel in Sydney, a self-proclaimed progressive synagogue? Why did I, an Israeli, have to address the Jewish community from a church? Why was I invited to speak in every university in eastern Australia yet, at Monash University, I was forced to hold a secret meeting with Jewish faculty in a darkened room far from the halls of intellectual discourse? Why, when the “leaders” of the Jewish community were excoriating me and my positions, did the Israelis who attended my talks express such appreciation that “real” Israeli views were finally getting aired in Australia, even if they did not all agree with me? Given the support my right to speak evidenced by most of the letters published in The AJN, this all raises disturbing questions over the right of Australian Jews to hear divergent views on Israel’s conflict with the Palestinians held by Israelis themselves.
It raises an even deeper issue, however. What should be the relationship of Diaspora Jewry to Israel? Whatever threat I represented to the organized Jewish community of Australia had less to do with Israel, I suspect, than with some damage I might to do to the idealized “Leon Uris” image of Israel which you hold onto so dearly. This might seem like a strange thing to say, but I do not believe that you in the Diaspora have internalized the fact that Israel is a foreign country as far from your idealized version as Australia is far from its image as kangaroo-land. Countries change, they evolve. What would Australia’s European founders think – even those who until very recently pursued a “White Australia” policy – if they were to see the multi-cultural country you have become? Well, almost 30% of Israeli citizens are not Jews, we may very well have permanently incorporated another four million Palestinians – the residents of the Occupied Territories – into our country and, to top it off, it’s clear by now that the vast majority of the world’s Jews are not going to emigrate to Israel. Those facts, plus the urgent need of Israel to make peace with its neighbors, mean something. They mean that Israel must change in ways Ben Gurion, Leon Uris and Mark Leibler never envisioned, even if that’s hard for you to accept.
Yet I see this as a positive thing, a sign of a healthy country coming to grips with reality, some of it of its own creation, even if it means that Israel will evolve from a Jewish state into a state of all its citizens – a bi-national or democratic state. Rather than “eliminating” Israel, this challenge is in fact a natural and probably inevitable development. It will not be easy, but if you can become multi-cultural, so can we.
But that’s our problem as Israelis. What’s your problem? Why should discussing such important issues for Israel be the cause of such distress for you? Because, I venture to say, you have a stake in preserving Israel’s idealized image that trumps dealing with the real country. In my view, Israel is being used as the lynchpin of your ethnic identity in Australia; mobilizing around a beleaguered Israel is essential for keeping your kids Jewish. I would go so far as to accuse you of needing an Israel in conflict, which is why you seem so threatened by an Israel at peace, why you deny that peace is even possible, why a peaceful Israel that is neither threatened nor “Jewish” cannot fulfill the role you have cast for it, and thus why you characterize my message as “vile lies.”
This, to be honest, is the threat I represent. Only this can explain why rabbis, community “leaders” and Jewish professors choose to meet me secretly rather than have me, a critical Israel, in their synagogues or classrooms. This is all understandable. You do need a lynchpin if you are to preserve your identity as a prosperous community in a tolerant multi-cultural society. I would just question whether the real country of Israel can fulfill that role, or even if it’s fair to Israel to expect it to.
We are different peoples. Israel can no more define Diaspora Jewish life than you can define Israel. Rather than knee-jerk defense of an imaginary place, you need to develop a respect for Israel and Israeli voices, a respect that will come only when you start regarding Israel as a real country. And you have to get a life of your own. You have to develop alternative Diaspora Jewish cultures and identities. Ironically, after all I have said, the Israeli government will resist that, for it uses you as agents to support its policies, often extreme right-wing and militaristic policies that contradict your very values of cultural pluralism and human rights. Remember: Israel does what it does in your name. Unless you take an independent position, you are complicit.
What befell me in Australia is just a tiny piece of a sad story of mutual exploitation: you using Israel to keep your community together, Israel using you to defend its indefensible policies. Perhaps something good can emerge from all this: robust discussion on the nature of Israeli-Diaspora relations. I’m going home to Jerusalem. You have to let Israel go and get a [Jewish] life.
Jeff Halper is the Director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions, a peace and human rights organization dedicated to achieving a just peace between Israelis and Palestinians. He can be reached at <jeff@icahd.org>
A great piece and it should be run, and it should be run in our papers as well. According to the CIA factbook on Australia, from the 2001 census, this is the breakdown of religions: Catholic 26.4%, Anglican 20.5%, other Christian 20.5%, Buddhist 1.9%, Muslim 1.5%, other 1.2%, unspecified 12.7%, none 15.3% I assume the Jewish population is part of the 1.2% or the unspecified.
Wikipedia, according to a 2006 census (why doesn’t CIA have this?) 25.8% Roman Catholic, 18.7% Anglican, 19.4% Other Christian 2.1% Buddhist, 1.7% Muslim, 0.4% Jewish, 2.0% other, 18.7% No Religion, 11.2% When the Jewish population is not even one percent of the population, there is really no credible reason why the Palestinian issue doesn’t get an airing in Australia in the way it does in Israel, or even in the U.K. (which I know is also biased, but not as much as here). When injustice occurs, it should always get an airing, but whitewash is more common when there is identification with those who are perpetuating the injustice. In numerical terms, that commonality is not evident.
Non-Jewish Australians do not even realise that they are only getting a tiny bit of the news and a very skewed version of it, because I guess, if they ever think about the issue, they wonder what our government’s investment in upholding the ‘Leon Uris’ vision of Israel is, and I assume that the majority think Israel is a land far away and we are more concerned with our own politics and minorities, as we actually should be, but we are not. I assume they also think Australia is the land of ‘a fair go’, and so as we support Israel, Israel must also support ‘a fair go’. It’s really pretty sickening, especially the fact that I am saying nothing new. Good on Halper for writing that. I wish it had been published.
The funny thing about Leon Uris is that he was a paid propogandist for Israel. I didn’t know that until I read it in Tom Segev’s 1967.
His film Exodus was a crock of crap and made the Israeli propaganda machine over $1 million bucks so they hired him to write propaganda for the Russian jews.
Hilarious when you think about. The Exodus was carrying illegal arms for a banned terrorist group.
It was not heroic settlers escaping from nazis, the nazis have been extinguished many years earlier, it was an illegal arms smuggling ship.
What a hoot for the morons in Israel now to whine about arms smuggling.
And he is right to say Israel is not a jewish state, it has been a jewish state for the precise same amount of time Australia was a white Australia in 1788.
Not one nanosecond.
But for those who have not read 1967 and think it is too long and heavy I advise a read.
It makes me laugh with rage and outrage in places and with sheer unadulterated joy at the stupidity of the US diaspora who banded together to force Johnson to swallow the big lie that Egypt had attacked Israel in 1967 and the fear Johnson felt that they might band together again to protest AGAINST the Vietnam war.
Bizarre.
Now we are getting somewhere. Elsewhere, at Ant’s old stamping ground of Web Diary,for example, equivalent processes are occuring for Anglo Aussies often involving a focus on Pauline Hanson or the production of cultural myths (and people) is also underway.
My understanding has me in mind that jingoism and sentimental volkische notions do not succeed in providing nations with the clarity of vision that comes from an honest inventory and humbler appreciation of human nature.
This is a good article that deserves widespread circulation, particularly in the Jewish community. If you have Jewish friends and relations, print them a copy.Augusta
Better still, rather than print a copy, send them a link to this website. While they are here, they may find value Antony’s other posts/articles.
Truth is contagious!
I really appreciate this article but I’m not the one who most needs to read it. I will share it with my mother, a member of an American Reform Jewish community in which I was raised, injected with pure love for the perfect state of Israel… Jeff Halper is amazing.