Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Fear in the lobby

My latest column for New Matilda is about the Zionist lobby and its hopefully stunted plans for the Middle East:

Public and private noises from the Obama administration have the Israel lobby spooked. Now they’re getting ready for the fight of their lives, writes Antony Loewenstein

Last week in Washington 7000 delegates from America’s most powerful Zionist lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), conducted its annual conference. With new leaders in office in Israel and the US, the mood was decidedly different to years past, when George W Bush was guaranteed to provide the Jewish state with unqualified support for its policies.

This year, however, the atmosphere was muted — even nervous. The vast majority of speakers talked about peace in the Middle East, and with the Palestinians, but the main topics were Iran, Iran and Iran.

Iran will also be a main focus of the message that Benjamin Netanyahu will take to his first White House meeting on 18 May. Uzi Arad, Netanyahu’s national security adviser (and former spy), told Newsweek last year that the Islamic Republic was threatening the region, Hamas and Hizbollah were intolerable, and therefore a Palestinian peace agreement would be meaningless until these problems were resolved.

Netanyahu presented this idea to the AIPAC conference as a unique opportunity for the Arab states to work with Israel against Iran through mutual fear. It was a cute formulation that some US-backed Arab dictatorships would like in private, but with no movement on Israeli/Palestinian peace, that line is almost impossible to pursue confidently.

One wonders when the global power elite will recognise that the Israeli Government has no interest in resolving the conflict with the Palestinians. Jerusalem is being colonised to erase Arab history from the area, and illegal West Bank settlements are expanding at a rate not seen since 2003, according to Yesh Din, an Israeli human rights group.

AIPAC delegates would therefore not have been pleased to hear US Vice President Joe Biden remind Israel at the conference that, “Israel has to work toward a two-state solution. You’re not going to like my saying this, but [do] not build more settlements; dismantle existing outposts, and allow Palestinians freedom of movement.”

AIPAC may talk about a two-state solution but the words are meaningless without serious pressure being applied to the Jewish state to at least cease all colony building and lift the Gaza siege. The pro-settler Zionist Organisation of America damned AIPAC for even mentioning the concept of two states, while more moderate Zionist groups praised Obama’s early noises on the issue.

Since Obama took office, the Israeli media has been filled with stories about how Jerusalem is worried there is a “breakdown” of US/Israel cooperation over key issues, such as engagement with Syria, Iran and the Palestinians. The recent comment by an Obama official that Israel should sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) caused profound unease within the Israel lobby, which reacts as if acknowledging the country’s massive nuclear arsenal was not an important step towards Middle East peace.

Israeli neo-conservatives appear discomforted that Washington is signalling a slightly more balanced approach to these issues. Such people have become complacent with their favoured client-nation status.

An unnamed official quoted in Ha’aretz (many of the Israeli papers rely far too heavily on anonymous sources for stories, providing cover for politicians or advisers to push policy from under cover) worried that the new US administration no longer saw Israel as “special” or “extraordinary”, and merely treated it like any other country in the Middle East. “The feeling is that the dialogue and coordination with the Arab states and with Europe is today no less important to the US and perhaps more so than with Israel,” the official lamented. Such stories are gaining traction in the American mainstream media, too.

Early indications are that Obama intends to press for a Palestinian state and engage, at least briefly, with Iran. National Security Adviser James Jones told a European counterpart recently that Washington will “convince Israel to compromise on the Palestinian question”. He went on: “We will not push Israel under the wheels of a bus, but we will be more forceful towards Israel than we have been under Bush.” The American Zionist lobby is already targeting Jones over such honesty.

Another Netanyahu ploy has been to demand the Palestinians accept Israel as a Jewish state, although, writes Tony Karon in The National, “[Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas might also have inquired why a Palestinian national leader should be asked to confer upon Israel a status denied it even by many learned rabbis.” It should be even harder to push this point when Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics found that Jews are now a minority in the Israeli “empire”. A total of 49 per cent Jews and 51 per cent non-Jews currently live in the territory under Israeli control. Apartheid is official.

This “split” between Israel and America may simply be a figment of journalists’ imaginations. What matters in the Middle East is action, not words. If Obama is serious about pushing some kind of workable peace in the region, he’ll need to strong-arm Israel in a way the Jewish state has never experienced before. MJ Rosenberg, head of the progressive US Zionist lobby, the Israel Policy Forum, argued last week that American Jews, the vast majority who vote Democrat, will support Obama if he wants to challenge Israel:

“[In] leading an effort to achieve peace, Obama will be advancing Israel’s security, along with our own. That is also why American Jews will rally behind him. It is not because they are indifferent to Israel’s security but because they understand that maintaining the occupation undermines Israel’s long-term survival. Proponents of the status quo believe that Israel can maintain the occupation and remain a democratic Jewish state. But that is impossible.”

Putting aside the fanciful notion of a democratic, Jewish state (a concept that even the most liberal of Zionists cling onto as if it were a present fact, despite the vast evidence that Israel has instituted over decades policies of profound racial discrimination against any non-Jews in the country) it’s much too early to determine the kind of response that Israel’s far-right Government will receive globally. Elements in the Italian Government reportedly expressed support last week for Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman’s racist plan to begin a loyalty oath for all Israeli citizens, but the response Lieberman got in France was much cooler.

The most encouraging sign from the AIPAC conference, largely unreported by the mainstream media, was highlighted by Mondoweiss blogger Adam Horowitz, who attended the whole event. AIPAC’s Executive Director Howard Kohr warned the delegates that there was a growing international movement to delegitimise Israel in the eyes of its allies. He talked about the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) campaign and Israel Apartheid Week:

“No longer is this campaign confined to the ravings of the political far left or far right, but increasingly it is entering the American mainstream: an ordinary political discourse on our TV and radio talk shows; in the pages of our major newspapers and in countless blogs, in town hall meetings, on campuses and city squares…

“And I want to be clearly understood here. I’m not saying that these allegations have become accepted. But they have become acceptable. More and more they are invading the mainstream discourse, becoming part of the constant and unrelenting drumbeat against Israel. These voices are laying the predicate for abandonment.”

Kohr was undoubtedly exaggerating his fears, because that’s what AIPAC does. But it was significant that he noted how the ground was shifting in public opinion (a recent study by found the vast majority of Americans were opposed to the settlement project).

The Zionist lobby is finding it more difficult to claim that Israel is a democracy that upholds the rule of law while increasingly common stories of Jewish pogroms in the West Bank are influencing public debate.

More voices — Jewish and non Jewish — are being raised to save the Middle East from Israel’s seemingly determined drive towards self-destruction.

one comment ↪