Monthly Archive for June, 2009

Making the kids hate you

Even Time magazine, a bastion of conservative American journalism, cannot ignore the brutal realities of Israeli occupation in the West Bank. A sea-change in public perception is occurring:

Walid Abu Obeida, a 13-year-old Palestinian farm boy from the West Bank village of Ya’abad, had never spoken to an Israeli until he rounded a corner at dusk carrying his shopping bags and found two Israeli soldiers waiting with their rifles aimed at him. “They accused me of throwing stones at them,” recounts Walid, a skinny kid with dark eyes. “Then one of them smacked me in the face, and my nose started bleeding.”

According to Walid, the two soldiers blindfolded and handcuffed him, dragged him to a jeep and drove away. All that his family would know about their missing son was that his shopping bags with meat and rice for that evening’s dinner were found in the dusty road near an olive grove. Over the course of several days in April last year, the boy says he was moved from an army camp to a prison, where he was crammed into a cell with five other children, cursed at and humiliated by the guards and beaten by his interrogator until he confessed to stone-throwing.

Walid says he saw his parents for only five seconds when he was brought before an Israeli military court and accused by the uniformed prosecutor not only of throwing stones but of “striking an Israeli officer.” The military judge ignored the latter charge and chose to prosecute Walid only for allegedly heaving a stone at soldiers.

The boy got off lightly: he spent 28 days in prison and was fined 500 shekels (approximately $120). Under Israeli military law, which prevails in the Palestinian territories, the crime of throwing a stone at an Israeli solider or even at the monolithic 20-ft.-high “security barrier” enclosing much of the West Bank can carry a maximum 20-year-prison sentence. Since 2000, according to the Palestinian Ministry for Prisoner Affairs, more than 6,500 children have been arrested, mostly for hurling rocks.

Walid’s story is hardly unusual, judging from a report on the Israeli military-justice system in the West Bank compiled by the Palestine office of the Geneva-based Defense for Children International, which works closely with the U.N. and European states.

When some Jews only want to shut down debate

During a fund-raiser in New York last night for the NGO 3 Generations – tasked to raise awareness of genocide – guest speaker New York Times columnist Roger Cohen told me that he was amused and frustrated when Jewish critics of his work could solely accuse him of “self-hatred”.

I said it was because his work challenged the core belief of blind, Zionist nationalism. He was, in my view, questioning the very idea of Israeli morality and the nation’s increasingly slim chances of a viable future. Occupation can be ignored for only so long.

Cohen spoke movingly about the recent Iranian uprising and his belief that what the world witnessed was the birth of a very public challenge to the Islamic Republic. He almost begged for other stories, such as the death of Michael Jackson, not to overwhelm far more important struggles around the world.

Killing any prospect for peace

The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions released the following statement on June 29:

The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) and Rabbis for Human Rights-Shomrei Mishpat welcome the Jerusalem Municipality’s announcement that it is considering a freeze on the demolition of 70% of the so-called “illegal” Palestinians homes built without a permit. The Deputy Mayor of Jerusalem himself, Yakir Segev, revealed that in 2008 only 18 permits were issued for building in the Palestinian parts of the city, home to some 270,000 Palestinians. It was the Municipality’s policy of granting so few permits that was driving Palestinians to construct illegally. “To get a construction permit in East Jerusalem you have to be more than a saint,” said Segev. In 2008 the Municipality demolished 87 Palestinian homes, issued 959 demolition orders and collected $3.6 million/€2.5 million in fines from Palestinians, 70% of whom live below the poverty line.

While we welcome any change of policy that reduces home demolitions, we must protest the continuation of that policy, even if parts of it are “frozen.” Twenty thousand (20,000) Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem housing 180,000 people currently have demolition orders.  Freezing the demolition of 70% of them means that 6,000 homes would still be slated for demolition.  In fact, the Municipality has indicated that it intends to remove completely those 6,000 homes. It seems to believe that offering compensation will legitimize that action.

This is not merely a game of numbers. Lying behind the plan is the intent to leave intact “unauthorized” Palestinian homes in areas of East Jerusalem of little interest to Israel – those on the periphery of the city in particular – while targeting those in areas that Israel wishes to annex. The targeted 30% are therefore in the most politically sensitive areas subject to conflict: the Old City, the Silwan area adjacent to the al-Aqsa mosque (already renamed the “City of David”), the Mount of Olives, Sheikh Jarrah and other strategic locales.

We call on the Jerusalem Municipality and the Government of Israel to end their policy of demolishing Palestinian homes altogether, whether in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Gaza – or inside Israel, where the homes of Palestinian and Bedouin citizens of Israel are also targeted.

It’s not as if Hamas should be allowed to rule

The US and Israel will be most pleased; you suffocate a strip of land for too long and its ruling (elected) party will suffer:

Discontent with Hamas over slow-moving Palestinian unity talks and Israel’s ban on Gaza reconstruction aid have led to a sharp decline in the Islamist group’s popularity, an opinion poll showed on Monday.

The survey by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Centre (JMCC) put public support for Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza Strip at 18.8 percent compared with 27.7 percent in its previous poll in January.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah faction is now more popular than Hamas with a 34.9 percent rating, up from 26 percent in January, according to the poll of 1,199 people.

Khader Khader, head of the media unit at the East Jerusalem-based JMCC, said Hamas’s popularity was hit by discontent in the Gaza Strip, where the group rules, over a lack of movement in Egyptian-sponsored unity talks with Fatah and in reopening the territory’s borders.

According to the poll, 26.5 percent of those surveyed blamed Israel for the deadlock in the Hamas-Fatah dialogue while 23.5 percent pointed a finger at Hamas and 15.5 percent said Fatah was responsible.

“It’s a sort of protest by the people (of Gaza) because there is no progress on these two major issues,” Khader said.

Because God told me so

Those poor, Jewish settlers in the West Bank just want to live “where Judaism was born.”

Fundamentalist Jews make the occupation sound so benign.

It is both immoral and brutal.

The terrorist threat of war

A West Bank checkpoint managed by a private security company is not allowing Palestinians to pass through with large water bottles and some food items, Haaretz has learned.

Israel must pay a price again and again

Ken Loach is an internationally-recognised film-maker who recently pressured the Edinburgh Film Festival to refuse money from the Israeli Embassy.

Now, Jewish activists in Australia are trying to make Loach aware of issues closer to home. The following letter was just sent to the Melbourne International Film Festival:

My name is Dr. Ned Curthoys, an academic at the Australian National University and someone with a long running concern for Palestinian human rights. It troubles me greatly that the state of Israel is listed as a sponsor of your event. I hope you’re aware that Israel has maintained an ever expanding 42 year old illegal occupation of Palestinian lands that deprives of Palestinians of basic human rights including freedom of movement, the right to harvest one’s crops, access to education and water, and the right not to have one’s ancestral home demolished because one isn’t Jewish. Operation ‘Cast Lead’ in Gaza has left many thousands of Palestinians homeless, killed hundreds of Palestinian children, and largely destroyed Palestinian civil society in the Gaza strip with schools, hospitals, and universities destroyed or severely damaged.

The quote below is from none other than Ken Loach, director of ‘Looking for Eric’, due to be screened at your festival. He is currently being made aware of Israeli sponsorship of the festival, and based on his stance at the Edinburgh film festival, will seriously consider withdrawing his film from the event. For ethical reasons, in defense of the human and political rights of a dispossessed and maltreated people, the Palestinians, I urge the Melbourne Film Festival to immediately refuse Israeli sponsorship of a film festival that should expand our intelligence and understanding rather than diminish us all.

We remember that the Palestinians have been dispossessed for sixty years, houses destroyed, communities wrecked. Israel ignores international law, the Geneva Convention and many UN resolutions.

We saw with horror the recent massacres in Gaza , how the Israeli army used phosphorous bombs in populated areas, how UN food stores and shelters were destroyed. The Red Cross described strikes on medical crews and the injured denied attention. Israeli journalist, Amira Hass, wrote of the killing of people flying white flags and the annihilation of entire families.

Faced with such crimes, Israeli poet, Aharon Shabtai, writes: “I do not believe that a state that maintains an occupation, committing on a daily basis crimes against civilians, deserves to be invited to any kind of cultural (event).”

I applaud this move and will provide whatever support I can.

Do we not matter?

Iraqi bloggers talk about the uprising in Iran and wonder why the lives of Iranians seem more worthy in the international arena than their own.

Planning to abuse any witness

Just another brutal day in the occupied, West Bank…

Sweeping the fools out to pasture

A telling example of how the old, establishment media simply doesn’t understand why their power and influence is waning:

An important hearing for all concerned

The UN has held an unprecedented public hearing in Gaza to broadcast live witness accounts from Palestinians who described seeing their relatives killed and injured during Israel’s January war.

One after another, they detailed Israeli rocket strikes and artillery shelling near a mosque, a UN school and on several homes across Gaza during the three-week war. The two-day hearing is part of an inquiry by the UN human rights council into the war led by the respected South African judge, Richard Goldstone.

Israel has refused entry for the inquiry team, accusing the UN council of an anti-Israel bias even though Goldstone himself is Jewish. But another round of hearings will be held in Geneva next week, for which some Israeli witnesses are expected to be flown in. They may include residents of Sderot, near Gaza, which has suffered repeated Palestinian rocket attacks.

“The purpose of the public hearings in Gaza and Geneva is to show the faces and broadcast the voices of victims – all of the victims,” Goldstone said last week. He had sat on South Africa’s constitutional court after the fall of apartheid and was a chief prosecutor on the UN criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

The emperor is very naked

Gideon Levy in Haaretz:

You can no longer scare the world with Palestinian terrorism, because – what to do? – there hasn’t been any for a long time, touch wood…Thanks to Obama, we have returned to the fateful, fundamental question: Will the Israeli occupation last another 40 years, or has the world become totally fed up with it, having decided to put an end to it? Obama is sending signals that he has chosen the second option.

Resist a clear case of repression

A heartening example of Jewish compassion and humanity:

A soldier was sentenced to 30 days in military prison after telling his commanders he would refuse to continue participating in his unit’s operations in the territories.

Corporal D., 19, a combat soldier in the Haruv Battalion of the Kfir Brigade, was sentenced not for refusing to serve in the West Bank, but for refusing to perform his duties.

D. announced his refusal after taking part in a March 26 operation in the village of Kifl Hares, in the northern West Bank. The soldier, several of his friends and several Palestinians present said Palestinian prisoners were abused during the operation.

IDF soldiers should be further encouraged to resist operations in the West Bank.

Journalists take to the Twitterverse

The following article by Sally Jackson appears in today’s Australian newspaper:

IT’S Tuesday and I’m at a forum on the topic “Twitter’s Impact on Media and Journalism”, busily taking down the speeches in shorthand. As I do, the business-suited woman sitting on my left is tweeting about me on her laptop.

“This is interesting,” she types. “I’m at #timj talk about Twitter and media/journalism. I’m tweeting and the journalist next to me has paper/pen :-)

Paper and pen? Got me! I do use them. However, I also use Twitter, which is how I caught up with her comment once I was back in the office.

These days anyone even slightly tech-savvy is at least vaguely aware of Twitter, the free micro-blogging internet service where anyone can say whatever they like to anyone who cares to listen, but only in 140-character bursts known as tweets.

Created in early 2006 by US software architect Jack Dorsey, and spun off into its own company in April 2007, Twitter is now beginning to gain mass traction. Twitter Inc won’t divulge an official count of registered users, but research firm eMarketer estimates there were about six million US users last year, projected to rise to 12 million by the end of this year. The Twitter Facts blog estimates there were eight million registered users worldwide by February.

Relatively slow to warm to Twitter, Australians now seem to be catching up, with HitWise reporting a 518 per cent increase in domestic visits between August 2007 and January this year. Among the visitors, it appears, were an increasing number of journalists.

Julie Posetti, a journalist and journalism lecturer at the University of Canberra, and one of the first in the world to study the media activity on Twitter, reports an “explosion” of media professionals in the Twittersphere this year, describing local journalists as “literally in a Twittering frenzy”.

“I saw it happening from February, during the Victorian bushfires,” Posetti says. “Before that I had done extensive searches on Twitter, trying to find journalists. Now the list has grown phenomenally, (including) a lot of mainstream and prominent journalists.”

On his blog, earleyedition.com, Courier-Mail reporter Dave Earley has compiled a list of about 500 local media industry types with accounts, which he says is far from exhaustive.

Anthony Dever, social media manager at BCM Partnership, has listed 378 Australian media organisations with Twitter accounts, on his blog fanbloodytastic.com. Dever’s Twitter account @MediaToFollow also keeps track of Australian news sites, newspapers, radio stations and magazines as they join Twitter.

Initially viewed as an entertaining novelty, Twitter started attracting serious attention in May last year, when it was timed as carrying live witness accounts of the Sichuan earthquake three minutes before the US Geological Survey reported it. It was also credited with being among the first to carry reports of the Mumbai terrorist attacks in November and the ditching of a New York jetliner in the Hudson River in January.

Twitter’s usefulness as an early warning system for breaking news, to borrow US journalist Mark Glaser’s phrase, has led some enthusiasts to predict it may eventually supplant traditional wire services.

Posetti says journalists also love Twitter for bringing in new voices and perspectives; for yielding contacts and sources; and most of all for providing instant, global connectivity, allowing them to engage more closely with one another and with their readers, viewers and listeners.

One of the most popular local media identities on Twitter is Mia Freedman, blogger (at mamamia.com.au), Sun Herald columnist and TV regular, who has amassed more than 6000 followers since making her first tweet about four months ago.

“At first I thought it was self-indulgent, but you can’t afford not to be there now,” Freedman says. “Twitter is kind of like the town square crossed with the growers’ market. You have your farm, but you have to exhibit your produce where everyone is to entice them to come where you are. It can also be a source for journalists, a mobile focus group and a great help desk.”

On the downside: “It’s a time-sucker. It’s addictive,” Freedman says. “You can ride Twitter all day. It’s the most extraordinary, unique experience, unlike any other. You get this incredibly layered, schizophrenic experience that is exactly like a lot of birds chirping in the background.”

With many of their staffers already enthusiastically tweeting, media outlets are starting to consider their corporate position on Twitter — and seem generally lukewarm.

Seven Media’s Pacific Magazines has banned staff from logging on to any social media websites at their desks.

“However, access to specific sites, such as Twitter and Facebook, is provided to staff who require use as part of their typical duties,” a spokesman says. “All staff also have non-restricted access to computers in the staff canteen.”

News Limited (publisher of The Australian), doesn’t restrict access to these sites, but generally takes a dim view, says group editorial director Campbell Reid .

“It’s our belief that journalists who work for us who have news to tell should do so through the vehicles they are employed to supply material for,” he says. “We’re very uncomfortable with staff tweeting in a professional sense under their own names, for a whole bunch of reasons, not the least of which is legal protection and concern about what is published.”

However, News won’t prepare formal staff guidelines until it knows whether Twitter is just a fad — “like so many things that burn so brightly on the internet”, says Reid. “We’re watching to see how it goes.

“We don’t want to spend a lot of time developing policies … and in three months’ time everyone’s realised it’s another way of having fairly boring conversations.”

The ABC has more readily incorporated Twitter as a media platform, with tweets forming part of its coverage of the Black Saturday bushfires and the Queensland/NSW floods. Leading ABC journalists such as Lateline anchor Leigh Sales, PM presenter Mark Colvin and ABC local radio host Adam Spencer are among the most followed media tweeters.

“The ABC is currently in the process of developing guidance to apply broadly across the ABC and, where appropriate, specific guidance for program makers and marketing staff … around managing their ABC social networking activities, which would include Twitter,” a spokesman says.

Fairfax Media will also release a social media policy soon, says group editorial director Phil McLean.

“I have asked our legal department to formulate something (and) we have combed around to see what other companies are doing,” he says.

It was a Fairfax reporter, technology writer Asher Moses, who galvanised debate about the need for journalist guidelines when he wrote a tweet last month labelling the woman at the centre of the Cronulla Sharks group-sex controversy a “slutty groupy”.

The resulting outcry led Posetti to frame her “Top 20 Take Away Tips for Tweeting Journos” (see breakout). But while the controversy highlighted the risks for journalists in merging their professional and private spheres, Posetti argues it would be a mistake for them to be frightened off doing so altogether.

“You need to be guided by the knowledge that everything you say on Twitter is public and it makes you publicly accountable,” she says. “That said, for journalists to effectively use Twitter, they need to be human beings. You need to bring some of your personality and life experience to your journalism so your audience can connect with you.”

Twitter holds other traps for unwary journalists. As a news source, the site was said to have “come of age” this month for its role in broadcasting information about the protests over the recent Iranian election. Some have even dubbed it the “Twitter Revolution”.

But the Iranian example has also highlighted Twitter’s weaknesses, says Antony Loewenstein, author of The Blogging Revolution. He cites examples of Twitter carrying incorrect information from Iran and instances of suspected deliberate misinformation.

“The use of the web in Iran is important. But there has to be scepticism,” Loewenstein says.

“It isn’t that Twitter is suddenly replacing the journalist who gets on the ground and reports. There is still a great need for more reflective, contemplative and well-researched stories.”

The media is only beginning to grapple with the positives and negatives of Twitter, Posetti says.

“This is an exciting period,” she says. “But it requires reflection and collaboration between journalists, employers and academics about the best way this tool can be used.”

The fear of online power

The Blogging Revolution examines the role of online dissent in repressive regimes. The last few weeks have proven the thesis of my book 100-fold; authoritarian states are fighting a losing battle to censor information:

Out of fear that history might repeat itself, the authoritarian governments of China, Cuba and Burma have been selectively censoring the news this month of Iranian crowds braving government militias on the streets of Tehran to demand democratic reforms.

Between 1988 and 1990, amid a lesser global economic slump, pro-democracy protests that appeared to inspire and energize one another broke out in Eastern Europe, Burma, China and elsewhere. Not all evolved into full-fledged revolutions, but communist regimes fell in a broad swath of countries, and the global balance of power shifted.

A similar infectiousness has shown up in subtle acts of defiance by democracy advocates around the world this week.

In China, political commentators tinted their blogs and Twitters green to show their support for Iranians disputing President Ahmoud Ahmadinejad’s reelection. The deaths of at least 20 people in violent clashes in Tehran have drawn comparisons online to “June 4,” the date of the Tiananmen Square crackdown in Beijing in 1989. And a pointed joke about how Iranians are luckier than Chinese because sham elections are better than no elections made the rounds on the country’s vast network of Internet bulletin boards.

“The Iranian people face the same problems as us: news censorship and no freedom to have their own voices,” 28-year-old blogger Zhou Shuguang said in a telephone interview from the inland province of Hunan. Zhou said he and several friends were among those who had colored their online pictures green, the signature color of the Iranian opposition.

In Cuba, President Raúl Castro’s government has imposed a complete blackout of news surrounding the Iranian elections. But word of developments is trickling through, anyway.

Havana-based blogger Yoani Sánchez, 33, who e-mails friends outside Cuba to get her entries posted online, said the Iranian protests — in particular, the reportedly widespread use of Twitter, Facebook and cellphones — have served as “a lesson for Cuban bloggers.”

“Seeing those young Iranians use all the technology to denounce the injustice, I notice everything that we lack to support those who maintain blogs from the island,” Sánchez wrote. “The acid test of our incipient virtual community has not yet arrived, but maybe it will surprise us tomorrow.”

“Today it’s you,” she told the Iranian protesters in one posting. “Tomorrow it could well be us.”

Meanwhile in Long Island, Arabs are forgotten

During a conversation I had today on New York’s Long Island with a 30-something Jewish woman:

It’s great for us [Jews] to have Israel.

Statement by a group of Iranian bloggers about the Presidential elections and the subsequent events

1) We, a group of Iranian bloggers, strongly condemn the violent and repressive confrontation of Iranian government against Iranian people’s legitimate and peaceful demonstrations and ask government officials to comply with Article 27 of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Constitution which emphasizes “Public gatherings and marches may be freely held, provided arms are not carried and that they are not detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam.”

2) We consider the violations in the presidential elections, and their sad consequences a big blow to the democratic principles of the Islamic Republic regime, and observing the mounting evidence of fraud presented by the candidates and others, we believe that election fraud is obvious and we ask for a new election.

3) Actions such as deporting foreign reporters, arresting local journalists, censorship of the news and misrepresenting the facts, cutting off the SMS network and filtering of the internet cannot silence the voices of Iranian people as no darkness and suffocation can go on forever. We invite the Iranian government to honest and friendly interaction with its people and we hope to witness the narrowing of the huge gap between people and the government.

A part of the large community of Iranian bloggers

July 26, 2009

The immorality of action

Headline in Israel’s biggest newspaper:

Good we didn’t bomb Iran.

How not to be a good Jew

Gay Pride marches are being exploited by rabidly homophobic Jewish extremists who plan to parade through Arab towns, asserting their “Jewish pride.”

Speaking to more Palestinians would be good

The wonderfully balanced British public broadcaster has some problems:

A study (pdf) I wrote, published by Arab Media Watch on 10 June 2009, confirms that the BBC’s coverage favours Israel. This comes as no surprise, as its findings echo those of numerous previous studies by AMW, universities and others, including the major, independent impartiality review commissioned by the BBC a few years ago.

What is surprising, given the review’s findings, is the continued extent of this one-sidedness, a sign that little has been learned from past mistakes.

AMW monitored BBC Online news articles about violence between Israelis and Palestinians over four months (February-May 2009). This aspect was chosen because it is one of the most reported in a conflict that is almost always in the news, and thus shapes public attitudes towards the peoples involved.

AMW analysed the prominence of each side’s viewpoint and version of events by monitoring how many words were devoted to quoting and paraphrasing Israeli and Palestinian sources, and in what order they were reported. AMW also analysed the prevalence with which each side were portrayed as instigating or responding to violence.

While every BBC article included Israeli sources, 35% had no Palestinian sources. Some of those articles omitted Palestinian statements and viewpoints that were available in other respected news outlets, such as reactions to Israeli violence or explaining why Palestinian violence took place. Of the 65% of articles containing Palestinian sources, 82% devoted more words to Israeli sources. This, as the study says, is “a woeful imbalance”.