Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Jews were killed and that’s not funny

Documentary maker and writer Max Blumenthal – I saw him tonight in New York and he’s an intriguing man who will be working on more projects related to apartheid Israel in the coming months and years – made this short film about Holocaust denier David Irving in 2008. The world needs more people like Blumenthal: Jewish, savvy, critical and funny:

  • moonkoon

    Hi, Welcome back. I like the new format.
    This is a bit long but I have read it, and if nothing else, it is mildly interesting, and the tone should not interfere too much with the reader's state of repose. But please skip right over it if you consider the very idea of talking about the scale and methodology of the Holocaust to be a provocative and disrespectful act.

    Thanks to Max and the Southern Poverty Law Center (??, Max and the SPLC!.. really? That same blind crusader that obligingly overlooks supporters of apartheid based initiatives such as the Israeli "settler" movement, like bingo king Moscowitz? Politics makes for such strange bedfellows,) for covering yet another controversial subject. Hopefully, Youtube won't ban this one.

    The Holocaust is sui generis in that it is the only historical event that I am aware of where criminal sanctions can be applied to those who question the "official" narrative.
    Australia has recently joined this debate stifling club so it is probably not a good idea to discuss Holocaust matters on Australian websites. The local Human Rights Commission appears to have criminalized speculation about the scale of, and methodology employed in, the tragedy.
    Hopefully, the Commission will not adopt the same proscription to the "black armband" view of local historical events should it ever be brought to its attention by way of complaint.
    April 17, 2009
    A FEDERAL Court judge has found revisionist historian Fredrick Toben guilty of criminal contempt of court after he continued to publish offensive material denying the Holocaust and vilifying Jews.
    Judge Bruce Lander yesterday ruled Toben, 64, had wilfully disobeyed previous court orders by keeping the material on his Adelaide Institute website, deciding the former school teacher was in contempt on 24 counts.
    Jeremy Jones, former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, brought the case against Toben on the grounds he had persistently breached the Racial Discrimination Act following a 2002 court decision against him…
    …Mr Jones said: … "It's nothing to do with free speech, it's about respect for the law.",2519
    So I will confine my remarks to other issues.

    David Irving is an unconvincing advocate of his claims. Perhaps he saw it as an opportunity to promote his books, (which I haven't read). He seems to be making it pretty easy for Max, giving him plenty to work with. One could be forgiven for thinking that maybe his heart wasn't in the job, that he is following a script. It seems to be an adaption of the technique of damning with faint praise.

    Whatever, maybe I'm reading too much into all of this. After all, Irving is a "bona fide" Holocaust denier, he has "done time" for a related matter. But I can't say I'm very impressed with some of his other historical interpretations. Irving's view that Hitler started WW2 to impress the Austrians seems somewhat superficial.
    Anybody who doesn't consider the disposition of Russia's army at the time (configured to attack) as a major influence in Hitler's deliberations about how to handle the situation doesn't have a lot of credibility with me.

    Pre-emptive attack has been employed before, you know.

    "…The English Parliament, rightly interpreting all these sinister movements in the north to be a menace, determined to strike the first blow and to invade Scotland. (The next bit isn't really relevant but it does add color and movement to the story. 🙂 ) General Fairfax had conscientious scruples regarding this unconstitutional procedure, and declined the duty of leading the army. Cromwell, having consulted the Psalms, found the necessary authority to take command in the hope that the Lord would 'enable this poor worm and weak servant to do His will.' "
    THE COVENANTERS -A History of the Church In Scotland from the Reformation To The Revolution. -By James K. Hewison

    Other contemporaneous events such as "…the effects of the Zionist elements among world Jewry which had declared war on Germany by means of a boycott on all German goods. "* would also need to be considered in a credible explanation about what got the disaster started.
    *The Transfer Agreement: The Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine. – By Edwin Black.

    Or consider Churchill's quoted view on the role of economic power as a factor in getting the ball rolling.
    (Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby…) "Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war," Winston Churchill said, "was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."
    Quoted in the Foreword, 2nd Ed. Sydney Rogerson, Propaganda in the Next War 2001, orig. 1938

    I am more interested in the views of deniers such as ex? Bishop Williamson, he has sacrificed his job and a relatively secure future in order to voice his doubts publicly. (The video report that precipitated his decline into disgrace, was, by the way, another example of the shock jock genre that Max sometimes adopts, Borat being the most famous current exponent of the art), or the recently convicted Faurisson.

    "…In 2006 Faurisson was charged and later convicted and given a three-month probationary sentence and fined F21,000 on the grounds that he denied <a title="The Holocaust" href="; rel="nofollow">the Holocaust in an interview given to Iranian television, under the <a title="Gayssot Act" href="; rel="nofollow">Gayssot Act, which prohibits <a title="Holocaust denial" href="; rel="nofollow">Holocaust denial in France. (link below)

    I'm not sure if I can add Max to my list of public figures that support the Spirit of Open Enquiry. At the moment it has two names on the list, Noam Chomsky and Susan Renouf.

    Noam Chomsky expounds on the subject.
    “…He was then brought to trial for “falsification of History,” and later condemned for this crime, the first time that a modern Western state openly affirmed the Stalinist-Nazi doctrine that the state will determine historical truth and punish deviation from it. Later he was beaten practically to death by Jewish terrorists*. As of now, the European and other intellectuals have not expressed any opposition to these scandals; rather, they have sought to disguise their profound commitment to Stalinist-Nazi doctrine by following the same models, trying to divert attention with a flood of outrageous lies. [A]s to the minor matter of my role … it has been the subject of a flood of lies and deceit…"
    Susan Renouf works tirelessly in defending other notorious deniers.

    There are many conundrums about WW2, for instance, why did the West ally itself with an atheistic communist regime and noted people killer,. J. Stalin?.
    I think we do ourselves a disservice by discouraging and persecuting those who question the conventional wisdom.

    P.S. Boothby is an interesting historical figure.
    He made frequent trips to Germany in the early 30's, on one occasion he met Hitler, and almost  immediately blew the whistle on him, saying in 1933, "…most of the things which seem to make life worth living will be swept away."
    He went on to successfully agitate (with Churchill and Amery) for a buildup of military forces.
    His fortunes waned in 1940 when he was found by a Parliamentary Select Committee to have neglected to mention his financial interest in a seized Czechoslovakian assets redistribution plan that he had been promoting.

  • dunja

    this was really painful to watch …