Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Australia dares not offend Israel even when crimes are clear

The latest on the Australia/Israel Mossad scandal:

The Australian government is far from satisfied with the response so far from Israel on the alleged use of Australian passports by a Mossad death squad.

In an interview with the Herald, a restrained Kevin Rudd said no more information had been forthcoming since Australia first protested last week.

”There is a way to go yet with our friends in Israel to resolving these matters to the satisfaction of the Australian government,” the Prime Minister said.

”We continue to be in contact with them. We’ll continue to work with our friends in Israel through multiple agencies and at the political level as well.”

The federal opposition has been conspicuous in its refusal to criticise Israel.

A week ago the Liberal senator Julian McGauran released a statement attacking the government for criticising Israel.

He said the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Stephen Smith, should ”start acting more like Australia’s chief diplomat and stop publicly pointing the finger at Israel as the culprit of the Mahmoud al-Mabhouh assassination”.

“The government has failed to delink their outrage of the forged passports from the assassination of the Hamas terrorist,” he said. ”They are two separate issues. The tracking down of terrorist leaders is an acceptable act in the context of the war on terror.”

The Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, refused to comment when asked whether he stood by Senator McGauran’s statement.

Later, he defended Israel, saying nobody knew the full story.

”Before I start, or anyone else starts questioning the motives of other countries, I think we should get to the bottom of this,” he said. ”I don’t want to assume bad faith on the part of a friendly democracy.”

Mr Rudd did not want to comment when asked by the Herald about the Coalition’s decision to defend Israel.

”I’m a lifelong supporter, defender and friend of the state of Israel …” he said. ”However, when it comes to this particular matter, I have a responsibility as Australian Prime Minister to get to the bottom of it and to establish that Australia’s interests are being properly safeguarded in the future and I will do that.”

  • Kevin Charles Herber


    So our Dear Leader Rudd, is a lifelong suppporter of a regime in which there are at least 5 accused war criminals in the government's ranks at present.  Two of them (Silvan Shalom & Ehud Olmert) were recently feted by Rudd, Gaza Gillard & the Liberals at pewkworthy functions in Melbourne & Sydney.

    And still no mainstream media had had the guts to comment on this outrage against Australia's international image as a functioning democracy

  • iResistDe4iAm

    ''and stop publicly pointing the finger at Israel as the culprit of the Mahmoud al-Mabhouh assassination'' 


    "The tracking down of terrorist leaders is an acceptable act in the context of the war on terror''  ~ Liberal Senator Julian McGauran  


    Alleged Israeli terrorists summarily execute an alleged Palestinian terrorist. Why do Australian politicians always side with the Israeli terrorists? 



    ''Before I start, or anyone else starts questioning the motives of other countries, I think we should get to the bottom of this" ~ Opposition Leader Tony Abbott 


    Why do Australian politicians always demand due process and rule of law when alleged Israeli state terrorism is under scrutiny, but never for alleged Palestinian terrorism? 


    Is Israel really an appropriate, unbiased or independent policeman, prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner of Palestinians?

  • Emma

    I don't actually understand *why* the political class in Australia are so pro-Israel. We don't really have significant trade links with them, do we? Is it about maintaining Australia's status as an American satellite state, or something? It doesn't make sense to me.

    Julian McGauran's defense of political assassination is sickening.

  • ej

    ''We don’t really have significant trade links with them, do we?'

    Correct. Total Australian trade with Israel in 2008-09 (exports plus imports – why the authorities use this sum as an indicator is beyond me) was just under $1 billion, putting Israel 38th on the list of countries with respect to trade importance (China has just taken pole position, having dislodged Japan which was on the top for the last 20 years).

    Australian exports to Israel in 2008-09 was a trivial $262mn (coal accounted for half that), while imports from Israel were $715mn, the most significant component being 'pearls and gems' (refined diamonds) at $82mn., the rest being various items of machinery. i.e. trivial.

    The pro-Israel stance can be readily accounted for: the grand unwavering colonial cringe that is Australian foreign policy.

    1. an American satrap (bipartisan).

    2. the local Israel lobby – relentless, shameless.

    Remember that the Labor Government has a Member for Israel in the House.

    Ironic, given that a decent segment of the Australian elite were anti-Semitic as late as the 1960s. Now they're anti-Semitic against the other mob of Semites.

  • pablo

    EJ. My guess is that it is easier to be pro-Israeli as a politician. Step out of line and the anti-semitic tag will be thrown. And of course – extra-judicial assassinations notwithstanding – there is a logic that can be trotted out to support their stance: Israel as a democracy, a free press etc. Sure it is a disconnect from current reality but perhaps the new stance of abstaining in UN votes together with a more nuanced  world view in criticising issues such as border restrictions, Apartheid like racism and state sanctioned terrorism will get a response. I'm not hopeful but then nor was I at the sudden end of the old South Africa. Who knows, maybe a good democratic  result from the latest Iraqi elections might start something.  

  • Marilyn

    They still believe the fairy tale of Israel being started by diplomacy though.   Deranged isn't it?