Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

ABC asks Israel if it behaved and it says yes

How’s this for news judgment and shoddy “journalism”?

Israel kills up to 20 people near Gaza and Australia’s leading evening current affairs program reports the story, then features an Israeli government spokesman, Mark Regev, for 10 minutes explaining the “official” position.

Any thought given to actually speaking to somebody other than the ones who killed the people?

  • SBS news was just as bad, I switched off in disgust.

  • ej

    Serendipitously, on Australian Story last night re the experience of Major Matina Jewell ('The Blue Beret') in the UN unit in Lebanon, mourning for her colleagues who had been obliterated by deliberate Israeli bombing.

    The same Mark Regev was playing his flunkey role claiming the bombing as accidental.

    Let him rot in hell.

  • Marcus Phelan

    7.30 Report had another Israeli Govt spokesflunkey (Regev must be on an exclusive retainer for Lateline). At least KO"B picked him up on his "useful idiots" description of the activists. As with Lateline, I switched off in disgust when no contrary opinion was allowed. Impartial ABC? Joke.

  • iResistDe4iAm

    Why does the ABC only censor the Palestinian narrative until an opposing position is available for broadcast, but not vice versa?


  • This thread hits the nail on the head.

    Last night, both the 7.30 report AND Lateline ran interviews with only one side of the date: the Israeli Government.

    Can anyone seriously imagine the ABC ever doing the opposite (ie only interviewing Palestinian/Arab/Moslem/anti-Zionist spokespeople and denying the Israeli Government a voice, twice in the same evening!)

    I did a search of the ABC website an hour or so before the tragic news of the attack on the peace flotilla filtered through. At that time, the ONLY references I could see on the site when searching for terms such as "gaza  flotilla" were comments by the public on articles that did not, of themselves, contain a reference to that story.

    The same applied on the Crikey website – and the same applied in both cases (ABC and Crikey) when I did a search on the term 'USS Liberty'

    This is outrageous bias. The public are clearly aware of these crucial stories and their significance – and can see a major event coming. But Australia's paid journalists and their editors bring shame on their profession by their disorted and self-censored output.

    If journalists are under orders to distort coverage, they should seek action through their unions orresign. I have no sympathy for the cowardly argument that they self censor because of their careers, families etc. It's an argument that cuts no ice in a profession that's supposed to be about establishing and presenting the truth.

    The Zionist Lobby has long maintained its grip over institutions such as the Australian media by stealth. Even to raise the issue of Zionist media bias five years ago was to invite ridicule and /or claims of 'anti-Semitism'. Now the ground has shifted and it's time for a full-scale political attack on Zionist bias in our media.

  • joe

    Ashamedly, Mark Regev is Australian

  • Mallee


    I take it you had a peak at the link provided by iResist…. and my comment there.

    As for Crikey, I woke up after one years subscription about 5 years ago and just ignore their pleas  for me to re-subscribe. I do not even visit them, they are not credible.

    As for the lies of the ABC; it calls itself ,'your' ABC. Complete BS, it is not 'ours' at all, yet we pay for the slackards and misinformation trolls.

    Of course a search, as to owns the limited number of 'non-news'  outlets, of  a few  sites will tell you who does. Even Wikipeadia [search Wiki… 'concentration of media ownership' ] will refer you, so far as Australia is concerned, to a 2004 article by 'Reporters without Borders ' stating that we were 41st position on a list of countries ranked by Press Freedom; well behind NZ at 9th and the UK at 28th. My bet is that it has become far lower in the rankings since 2004.

    The simple test of a media's credibility is simple; will they deal honestly with the questions and scientific findings on the blowing up of the towers and building No 7? If not, they are just not credible and are providing aid and comfort for the protection of the real mass murderers behind 9/11. That is what 'OUR' ABC and 'our' government is plainly doing, as frightening and dispicable as it may seem. (just start at architects and engineers for 9/11 truth.or where there are 10,000 supporting the petition for a new investigation that 'OUR' ABC tries to hide.)

  • Kevin Charles Herber

    I agree with Syd Walker when he says:

    "The Zionist Lobby has long maintained its grip over institutions such as the Australian media by stealth. Even to raise the issue of Zionist media bias five years ago was to invite ridicule and /or claims of ‘anti-Semitism’. Now the ground has shifted and it’s time for a full-scale political attack on Zionist bias in our media".

    Syd, I believe it's also time for a serious look at why both major political parties kiss the Aussie Jewish mafia's arses. I believe I know exactly why.

    I'm ready if anyone wants to go with Syd's suggestion. 

    PS: I'm a former ABC News reporter/producer & Seven Business reporter/producer, currently owrking as an industry lobbyist

  • Don

    Kevin :

    Cant help you & Sid , but  what a good-sounding idea that is . Hope it has not reached its peak as a topic of talk , only to fizzle without graduating into the world of action  .

    I can make coffee , but no advice from me .

    Is there anymore to this idea ?