Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Australian Jewish students can’t handle posters that support Palestine

The Australian Jewish News now runs an online TV channel. So what are they producing? Videos such as this, where students at UNSW talk about the supposed anti-Israel sentiment in the wake of the Gaza flotilla. Perhaps the most tragic part of this is one Jewish ‘leader’ showing the camera where on a map of the university pro-Palestinian flyers are being placed.

So it’s now intimidating for poor, Jewish students simply having pro-Palestinian flyers and speakers appearing on a lawn outside a campus library? I guess critical voices of Israel should just keep quiet.

Just remember this when the media is filled with articles about the “rise in anti-Semitism”:

4 comments ↪
  • Maybe an armed escort to protect these poor poor Jewish students.

    They talk about harassment at the campus and already the wetting their pants, how about thinking for a second what the Palestinians go through every second of their lives.  If that's too much to comprehend then just imagine the harassment the people on the aid convoy went through.

  • Anna

    Hi Anthony,

    Jewish students aren't against posters supporting Palestine, we are against posters that bash Israel which are so dramatic they flame hatred and radicalism on campus; as Khaled Abu Toamed [a Palestinian himself] has pointed out, there is a large difference between support for one group and the deligimisation of the other.

    This is because such posters inflame hatred and radicalism and lead to Australian students who support Israel, Jewish and non-Jewish, being attacked on campus, whether they are simply walking around [one Jewish student attack on campus last week in this fasion] or trying to debate the issue with protesters on campus [one non-jewish student attacked on campus for this last week].

    I don't like not feeling safe on my own campus simply because I am known as a Zionist.

    There is a large difference between a 'pro-Palestine peace week' poster and an 'israeli apartheid' or 'israeli war crimes' poster which shows Israelis, dirty, ;large nosed, heavily bearded, hairy, and granning, washing blood off their hands whilst shot Gazans lie on the floor, with a picture of Uncle Sam watching and laughing [as there was this week]. Inflamatory and overly dramatic posters such as that have no place at a University campus.

    I think it is rich to compare jewish students who, often likemyself, do NOT engage with protesters/anti-israel peope on campus at all, to feel at risk on campus, to the aid boats, who were clearly and obviously putting themselves into a situation imbued with the tones of sovereignity and terrorism where there was a substantial risk action would be taken against them.

    Again, I don't think my walking around my own campus, peacefully and not wanting any trouble, should invite harassment or attack. it is not about jewish/non-Jewish, it is about Israeli supporter/not.

  • AJM

    You're so right Anthony. They're just insane!! How on earth can these people justify defending themselves??!!

    I mean all that's happening is that they're being actively pursued, physically harassed and told that their opinion (and/or religion) is the cause of all evil while misleading and false material is handed out to hundreds of people and being presented as facts.. what are they complaining about? Obviously they should just lie down and take it.

    I know, why don't we organise an opportunity for these awful awful Zionist students to go and apologise to those who attacked them? Something along the lines of: "I'm sorry non-student who is on campus intimidating me and pushing me around, I really shouldn't have tried to defend myself or thought I had a right to support a different view to you.. I think I'll just lie here on the ground and let you kick me, as everything Israel does is obviously my fault and since everything bad that ever happened to a Palestinian was caused by me, I really can't ever complain about anything unjust that occurs to me"

    As usual Anthony you're a paragon of virtue. If only more people were like you!

  • Adam

    What I find amusing is the "leader" from UNSW who was whining about activists, some of whom no doubt were students, setting up stalls on campus and trying to talk to and hand leaflets to as many people as possible.

    How frightening that must be. People publicly stating a differing opinion, and trying to convinced others of the rightness of their cause. How undemocratic.

    It's worth noting that he describes the leaflet as being deceitful. Apparently it was from the day after the flotilla massacre… sorry self-defence… when media reports were still fluctuation between the number of dead being at 16 or at 9. I would have thought that picking one of the numbers that was being touted by the media would have been acceptable, but apparently not if it allows for a quick propaganda snipe.

    I wonder, if Israel had intended to board peacefully as they claim they didn't do it during daylight and in Israeli/Palestinian waters after publicly announcing their intention to board and loudly demanding the surrender of the "criminal" fleet to Israel's authorities.

     

    Of course harassment should be condemned, especially if it involves physical aggression, but if they can't prove it happened it shouldn't be reported as the unvarnished truth.  I wonder what they have to say about the harassment that vocal critics of Israel are often subjected to.