Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

The indignity of being colonial losers in Palestine


Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat has dismissed the documents released by Al Jazeera that show private offers by PA officials to Israelis on contested issues than previously revealed as “a bunch of lies”.

In an appearance on Al Jazeera shortly after the documents were released on Sunday, Erakat said the Palestinian leadership had “nothing to hide” and dismissed most of the report as lies.

He said that the information shown contained mistakes and inaccuracies and that his words were taken out of context and he was misquoted.

“I have always said that east Jerusalem is part of Palestine.

“No body has given up anything, I have shown Jerusalem Map on Al Jazeera a year ago. The land exchange principle was discussed before,” Erakat said.

He said that all documents were shared in advance with the Arab league and several Arab countries, including Egypt, Jordan, and Qatar.

“We have not gone back on our position. If we had given ground on the refugees and made such concessions, why hasn’t Israel agreed to sign a peace accord?” he asked.

Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, told Egyptian newspapers editors in Cairo that he kept the Arab League updated on all details of the negotiations with Israel, according to the Palestinian news agency Wafa.

“I don’t know from where al Jazeera came with secret things.

“There is nothing we hide from our brothers, the Arabs,” Abbas said.

The chief Palestinian negotiator in the 2008 talks, Ahmed Qureia, told The Associated Press that “many parts of the documents were fabricated, as part of the incitement against the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian leadership.”

Mahmoud al-Zahar, a senior Hamas offcial in Gaza told Al Jazeera that the Palestinian authority officials should be ashamed of themselves.

  • Daniel

    It is typical of extremists to attempt to shame (if not kill) those who make concessions in  negotiations for the sake of peace. Antony, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for joining in with the mockery of the moderates, instead of praising their courage. It seems to me you would prefer a violent confrontation than a peaceful resolution.

  • vaa


    This has to be the most ignorant comment i've seen on the subject so far.

    Tell us please ,what did those lackeys MODERATES get in return for their courageous illogical  concessions ?

    More Ethnic cleansing , more land theft , more oppression

    Palestinians knew all along that Israel has never had, will never have any intention of peace as long as it stands. Peace is an illusion. It will never happen so long as Zionism persists in the Israelis’ psyche.But at least were done with the hasbara " No one to negotiate with"

  • Daniel

    Ignorant, really? And did you actually look closely into who offered what, or just going off the Guardian editorial like everyone else?

    As far as I'm concerned the PA's reputation is enhanced. There is not going to be any peace without compromises from both sides. And yes I agree the Israelis came off looking worse here and will be under increased pressure to enter serious negotiations.

    But as for the territorial issues (not the most important in my opinion but no doubt the ones you extremists like to seize on) :

    "The Palestinian maps show that for every West Bank territory annexed to Israel, land is given to the Palestinians in compensation."
    One of the bigger stumbling blocks is that Israel wanted certain Arab towns to become part of Palestinian territory, whereas the residents insist on remaining Israeli. Seems a little ironic, until you realize that territory may not be as important as is made out. Its possible that most Palestinians just want to get on with their lives, are more interested in jobs, education, welfare, democratic rights, security, freedom. A shame that these things aren't given more prominence in negotiations – rather than who lived where, how many years ago.

    Do they really dream of returning to some ancestral farm to herd goats, or would they prefer to live in an apartment in a bustling, cosmopolitan city, with a job in a technology company? About time someone asked these questions, the conflict may not be as intractable as it seems, if their aspirations are compatible.


  • Andrew


    It is Hamas, who are actually the elected government of the Palestinians the last time I looked, who comes out of this sad farce with their reputation enhanced, not the PA. Hamas have bravely held the line and refused to be co opted by Israel. We may not like everything they do, but one must admire their integrity. Things will get interesting if the Egyptians take Tunisia's lead and overthrow dictatorship they live under. With a bit of luck the border to Gaza will open to Egypt and life will get a bit easier for the Gazans, while putting Israel on the back foot. Israel has long relied on the support of the torturers in Egypt, with generous US financial assistance of course, it would be nice to see this nasty little arrangement terminated.

  • Daniel

    Andrew, I would LOL if it wasn't so serious.

    Hamas have never compromised with anyone because they are extremists -they want to destroy Israel, nothing less. If you admire them for not backing down, you probably also admire the Nazi SS for being steadfast in their devotion to a similar cause, and there's not much else I have to discuss with you.