Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Handy reminder, with video evidence, that Victorian police were thugs towards BDS supporters

5 comments ↪
  • examinator

    Antony it is simply the “Golden rule” in action
    “Who ever has the Gold rules power”.

    As I said before the police action was simple over the top and as it turned out,( IMHO) in the absence of a legitimate law decided to use this demonstration as a test case. They clearly chose this demonstration as it offered the least risk for 'blow back' law suits for false arrests. In a more violent demonstration the police may have injured a protester which may have then justified actions .
    My concern is a wider one in that the police in Vic are no longer officers of the peace but tools for one side in a legal debate.

    BTW this does not mean that I supported the protesters action . Based on the this video and being educated in the ways of marketing . I think that the removed statement from their web site was pure marketing a bit like Coke Cola supplying their drinks to the US army…. is that directly helping the war effort? No more than the successor to US Postal department by delivering emotional support from their loved ones.

    Do we stop superannuation because it may invest in a company that may also manufacture knives and forks for the military? Or maybe one that makes humi- cribs AND machines that keep soldiers comfortable in their tanks in the dessert?

    Morally two wrongs don't make a right. To me The way the campaign is naively being run is like a scatter gun rather than a sniper rifle it's as guilty of creating collateral damage …. This group's principal i.e. the obscene, brutal and apartheid OCCUPATION by Israel's 'extreme right' dominated regime has been over shadowed by the PROTESTER'S right to protest. Arguably two different issues

  • treesnotgreens

    Once again lets just bring this entire issue back to its core.

    Is it Palestinian human rights to their own piece of turf as an independent self determing entity,
    or is it also /really about depriving the jews of their own right to self determination by not allowing Israel to exist but have it absorbed into a mish mash Lebanon style canton ridden chaos.

    Antony Loewenstein by my reading wishes and advocates for the latter

    I strongly feel that both entities are entitled and deserve their respective and independent existence.

    BDS does not by their own very definition of having all of the 3 generations
    of Arabs follow their grandparents and flood what is Israel, rather than settling into what will be Palestine.

    The founder of BDS, Barghouti, has stated this in effect publicly.

    And that is why I am fundamentally against BDS,

    From river to the sea Palestine will be free, translates into ALL rights for Palestinian Arabs , and none for the 5.5 million Jews that currently inhabit Israel.

    And THAT is THE ULTIMATE RACISM.

  • Kevin Herbert

    It's clear the BDS is biting into Israel's already tarnished image globally.

    The Brenner protest is just another element of it, which received a lot of publicity..all good for the BDS.

    'Hitman' Howes rejoinder re Nazi thugs again shows his appalling lack of judgement. After all, this is the idiot who publicly supported Obama's hit list of enemies of the USA.

  • "Once again lets just bring this entire issue back to its core."

    Why is it acceptable for Jews to return to their self-declared 'homeland' 2,000 years (or 80 generations) after their co-religionists were expelled by foreign occupiers, the Romans (now Italians),
    but NOT acceptable for Palestinians to return to their ancestral homeland just 64 years (or 2.5 generations) after they were ethnically cleansed by foreign colonists who dispossessed them and continue to forcibly deny them the right of return (for 64 straight years in violation of UN resolutions, international law and human rights conventions)?

    And why is it acceptable for indigenous South Africans to resist (using both armed resistance AND boycotts) their forced dispossession and colonisation by foreign colonists, and the segregated Bantustan state solution forcibly imposed on them,
    but NOT acceptable for indigenous Palestinians to resist (using either armed resistance OR boycotts) their forced dispossession, colonisation and occupation by foreign colonists, and the segregated two-state solution forcibly imposed on them?

  • [Part 2 – split due to comment size limitations]

    In 1994 — after 342 bloody years of dispossession, colonisation and resistance — the indigenous South Africans finally reclaimed their freedom when they elected one of their own as President of their ancestral homeland.

    Like the indigenous South Africans before them, the Palestinians will eventually reclaim their freedom in their ancestral homeland. Freedom with justice and equal rights.
    Unlike the indigenous South Africans, the Palestinians won't have to wait 342 years. Time, justice and history are on their side.