Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

An apology and explanation: when the tongue goes before the head on Israel/Palestine

During the recent world tour for my new book, After Zionism, I appeared with my co-editor Ahmed Moor at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. Here’s a report of the evening from the Palestine Chronicle.

During the Q and A, a Jewish man, Jonathan Hoffman, co-Vice  Chair of the Zionist Federation and alleged ally of the far-right English Defence League, asked me how many people had to die to create one-state in Palestine and Israel. Initially, the chair of the event Frank Barat dismissed the question as being from a known Zionist provocateur but Hoffman insisted I answer. Eventually I said in frustration: “Six million. That’s my answer. Write that down”.

It was a stupid comment, ill-advised and said without proper thought. I unreservedly apologise. A number of friends and colleagues have written to me expressing concern about it and they’re right. I should never have said it as it goes completely against my beliefs. I do not advocate violence against civilians. My co-editor Moor rightly said after me that nobody had to die to create the one-state solution but people’s minds and actions had to change.

For many Zionists, advocating a one-state solution is akin to pushing the Jews into the sea. Nothing could be further from the truth. The current situation on the ground in Israel and Palestine is a Jewish state using its power and privilege to discriminate against Muslims, Christians and others. It is neither democratic nor just. One of the key points that I’ve been arguing for many years about the Middle East (including in this recent piece in The Guardian) is that the discussion isn’t between one or two states but between ongoing apartheid and every citizen in Israel and Palestine being treated equally. In my view, and the position of increasing numbers of people globally, the one-state equation is the only way to achieve this and that’s why we’re advocating for it.

Of course, none of this excuses my out of line, frustrated and offensive outburst.

Here’s to a healthy and respectful debate moving forward and finding democratic means to bring peace and justice to all Israelis and Palestinians.

  • Jim

    Not to worry Antony. We all get frustrated by impossible bigots at times. All of us who know you, even your opponents, know that you would never support any kind of violence or killing in the name of politics.

    Keep on track. You are perfectly right that the only just and fair solution for Palestine/Israel is one where all people live in a single state.

    • examinator

      I agreed with you until you came down to your support for a 1 state solution.
      I'm still waiting for some one to answer my long standing concerns on the HOW this is going to be implemented much less controlled.
      At the risk of being cynical or worse…..I don't trust people as a whole to do the right thing about anything… if they did we wouldn't need police and the problem between Israel/ Palestinians would have been resolved years ago!
      Consider how long the Jews have maintained there separateness longer than the Mongolians have been dreaming of their salad days of power. The mental link is that the Jews cultural memory was built on similar remembrances of ancient power. Therefore I can't see the rump of the Jewish culturists giving away their notion of separateness to allow a one state. It would be a bit like handing ownership of Sydney to the original aboriginal tribe and expect the citizen to go along with it.
      What is suggested i.e. leaving Jews in situ of all the good land etc will if implemented, finish up with the Palestinians being a very large still disenfranchised minority with chips on their shoulders and 30% Jewish extremists taking their anger/paranoia under ground.
      Keep in mind their mind set created the obscenities of intimidation et al pre Israel's creation, so they have ample historic precedents …We're not talking about reasoned philosophers here we're talking about emotionally motivated people using religion as justification. History tells us THAT never ends well.

  • rebeccalesses

    Have you considered asking Israelis if they want one state, or are you planning to impose it upon them? Most Israelis and Palestinians, in the most recent opinion survey, still support a two state solution.

    • chicothecat

      Currently, according to a Hebrew University poll, 28% or Jewish Israelis are up for discussing one state as an option. Still a minority, but a substantial number considering not a single party or movement is campaigning for it. More to the point, while border changes etc associated with two states can be stitched up over people's heads, transition towards one state will require active participation and willingness at all levels of society, twinning and coexistence projects and merger talks within professions and all walks of life, and explorations of how to combine protection of separate cultures with multiculturalism, much as many other countries such as UK have engaged in with immigrant cultures. However, it may not all be sweetness and light, if Jim Crow America and Northern Ireland are anything to go by: but by inference, the people to watch out for will be the Israeli extremists, not the Palestinians.

  • Armani

    Forget about it Antony. Anyone who knows your work would realise that it's an answer given in frustration to a deliberately antagonistic question coming from a deliberately antagonistic person. And anyone who has had a discussion about this issue would have had to face someone like that at some stage, though fortunately for most of us it's not been in such a public setting. I know I've said some things in the heat of anger that I've regretted later. You're only human!

    For me your work still stands as some of the best I've read and I'll continue to read it and respect it.

  • Unfortunately, hasbarists like Hoffman are expert at such provocations. While it's hard to stay ahead of them, it's critical that we anticipate them and think clearly. I know how hard this is especially when you're on a book tour, etc.

    But their job is to trip you up & our job is not to let them.

  • Marilyn

    How many Palestinians and others have been slaughtered for Israel to steal more and more land.

  • Sonja Karkar

    I agree with Jim and Armani above Antony – your tireless work speaks for itself. Those of us who know you well, know that you would never advocate violence. Don't waste your energy trying to fend of the attacks. You've apologised. That should be the end of the matter.

  • examinator

    Antony, isn't it wonderful how many of your detractor read what you say and vote not on you but by proxy on commenters.
    None of these detractor have the courage of their latte convictions to write and sensibly explain why they disagree!
    Least of all about the articles themselves.
    A bit like children writing obscenities on the toilet walls about teachers.
    Like me, hate me, agree/disagree with me at least I do have the courage of my convictions and simply don't sink to childish levels.

  • realzionist

    Understand that Hoffman is the self styled " leader " of a minute lunatic fringe of the ZF. This co vice chair thing is a joke. He was the only candidate. He is largely protected by the Islamophobes that control the Jewish Chronicle, i.e. Stephen Pollard and Martin Bright. He is useful to them because he gets to say the crazy stuff and behave in crazy ways that they can't.

    The moral of the story is to understand that any answer to an idiotic question will will inevitably be idiotic. I wouldn't have answered the oaf. I would have had him thrown out. He is used to that. Most famously when he got thrown out of the Royal Albert Hall for hooliganism.

    For one of his more memorable performances which perfectly illustrates what Antony was unwittingly having to deal with go to you tube and search…

    ahava protest london 27112010 ( no caps )

  • Ned

    An end to the matter! Probably, A Jones has ensured that,
    everyone stuffs up some time.
    But the real stuff ups end in war, killing and theft and they keep at it. Let us concentrate on the professional 'stuffer uppers' and their consequences.