Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

In relation to religious vilification, should we limit freedom of speech?

I’m rapt to be involved in this upcoming debate in Sydney:

one comment ↪
  • examinator

    I would argue that the right to freedom of speech as an absolute does not, can not, exist in a civilised society. Therefore we are talking about freedom of speech in aspirational sense within the parameters of the prevailing (our) culture.
    It then seems to me to be self evident that the question is does our culture respect other cultures?

    If the answer is yes then we should as a cultural 'norm' refrain from attacking or insulting mocking etc the other cultures full stop! Doing any of these to another culture simply isn't being respectful
    Contrary to the often quoted furphy it IS possible to discuss other cultures even disagree with element there of without being disrespectful , insulting et al. Clearly racial vilification simply isn't being respectful it is predicated on the (false) notion that our culture is better and as superior we are then entitled to treat it ( the other culture) with disrespect.
    e.g. Consider the principal involved … If say… I was to tell my female staff that “ all women should be barefoot and pregnant, in the kitchen ” or “You women shouldn't sponge off business/ public service to fund their children” or that “'all women should be obscene and not heard” I'd probably be up for sexual harassment (rightly so). Now, logically how are any of those quips showing respect for women? Simply put it's not. Now the eagle eyed amongst you will be concerned about the second quip. The point there is the difference between a prejudice and a valid comment i.e. the term “ You ….. shouldn't sponge off” clearly a pejorative one, is the offending bit that makes the difference. There is an inherent attitude behind the comments as written that is one of superiority of the speaker and lack of respect for women.
    In principal I have some difficulty with the notion that we have sanctions to socially engineer a change in attitude to show suitable respect for women (so as to treat them as equal not lesser) then why not other people ( men and women) and their culture?

    The next part of the equation is an objective 'anthropological' definition of culture. I set of rules and practices that are the manifestation of survival needs of a society. Many of which are now rituals, where the basis or their reason is lost in time.

    The argument that it's better to have the prejudice out where we can see it, is IMO a cop out, a bended knee to our superiority (sic) over the lessor Compatriots i.e. 'well that's the way they are'…. an excuse to do nothing except tut tut!

    In all my many contacts with the brain damaged street alcoholic through well anyone else I've yet to find some one who isn't capable of modifying their less societally acceptable actions . The two caveats are the extremes of age ( very young children; the senile) and the those who the extremely mentally ill.
    I'd suggest that our freedom to choose still exists … we have the right to transgress and earn the opprobrium of society if we so desire . There has always been antisocial individuals and they rightly have to accept the consequences of their actions.
    PS sorry for the length but the ideas demand explanation.