Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

This is news: 65% of Australians view Israel negatively

According to a new BBC global poll (via the Jerusalem Post):

Israel retained its position as one of the world’s most negatively-viewed countries, according to BBC’s annual poll published Wednesday night. 

With 50 percent of respondents ranking Israel negatively, Israel keeps company with North Korea, and places ahead of only Iran (55% negative) and Pakistan (51% negative).

The 2012 Country Ratings Poll was conducted among 24,090 people worldwide, and asked respondents to rate whether the influence of 22 countries was “mostly positive” or “mostly negative.”

Evaluations of the Jewish state, already largely unfavorable in 2011, have worsened in 2012. Out of the 22 countries polled, the majority in 17 of them view Israel negatively, while only three (the US, Nigeria and Kenya) view Israel positively. In Kenya, negative ratings of Israel fell by 10 points to 31%, while the country experienced an even larger increase in positive ratings of Israel, rising 16 points to 45%.

Negative perceptions of Israel in EU countries have continue to rise, reaching 74% in Spain (up 8%), 65% in France (up 9%), while in Germany and Britain the negative views remain high but stable (69% and 68% respectively). In other Anglo countries, perceptions of Israel are worsening, including in Australia (65%), and Canada (59%).

Among Muslim countries, perceptions of Israel have continued to deteriorate. Of particular concern for Israel is the country sitting on its southern neighbor, Egypt, where 85% of the population views Israel negatively, up 7% since 2011. 

In Asian countries, public opinion on Israel is growing increasingly antagonistic. In China, just 23% of those surveyed view Israel positively compared with 45% negatively. In India, overall opinion has shifter from being divided in 2011 to leaning negatively. In South Korea, negative views of Israel rose a full 15% (to 69%), while positive views decreased 11% (to 20%)

The saving grace for Israel is United States, where the proportion of people viewing Israel negatively has decreased six points to 35% since 2011. This statistic marks the most positive views on Israel expressed in the US since tracking began in 2005.

People viewing Israel negatively around the world cite the Jewish state’s foreign policy as the main factor influencing their perception, while those who view Israel positively cite culture and Jewish traditions.

15 comments ↪
  • peterhindrup

    With the (almost?) Universal support by western country governments and the huge bias by media for Israel, the negative view across Europe particularly, but in the other western countries as well is overwhelming positive for the world in general. Eventually there must come a tipping point, where public opinion sways political opinion.

    A survey of all candidates prior to the next election and a ‘work against any politician supporting Israel’ campaign could, particularly in vulnerable seats, be enough to swing the results.

    That Iran, subjected to the most vicious campaign of slander for past ten years or so comes in lowest ought surprise nobody, but I believe that that image could be easily changed with a well run campaign. A much easier sell than that of promoting the Palestinian cause, not because the Palestinians are any the less slandered, but because the demonisation has been ongoing for such a long period.

    For most in Australia switching from the belief that the Israelis are saints, and the Palestinians, followed by the Arabs, are the devil incarnate, is to turn a lifetimes beliefs upon their heads. However if people are beginning to view the Israelis as they are, for what they are, then those people have already, consciously or not, began to see Palestinians and Arabs in a more positive light.

    The US results are of no significance. The distortion of events in their media is so off the planet, that the 35 percent is not a bad result. As the US flounders, ever deeper into debt, continuing to loose credibility across the globe, Israel will be abandoned. Without the muscle of the US behind it, Israel will be seen for what it is, a pipsqueak few million delusionalists who believe that they can dominate in world affairs.

    • examinator

      As I explained to you in http://antonyloewenstein.com/2012/11/02/israeli-j
      I'm not convinced that the Iranian regime is being slandered all that much. It's hardly a beneficent one . Then again I differentiate between regimes and the people… pity these vilification programs don't.
      However there is a hypercritical campaign of gigantic proportions by the increasingly out numbered white establishments to paint Iran as some sort of latter day demonic regime while equally fatuous assumption they are in a position to cast any stones let alone the first (so to speak).
      I think it's clear that the like Omar Khyam's spectral finger time and circumstances moves on and the past can't be recreated. The context that determined the past and ideas have changed.
      A bit like the Republican, Liberal lament the political parties are driving forward by looking into their rear vision mirrors.
      Meanwhile the public has changed… the Israeli regime is doing what most on the right do when under pressure simply retreat further into the past notions.
      It's only a matter of time before the Israeli, US and yes the Aussie regimes find themselves in the situation where by they will either change or disappear.
      The problem I see is will that change come or will their desperation destroy the countries trying to hang on.

  • Peter Hindrup

    'It's only a matter of time before the Israeli, US and yes the Aussie regimes find themselves in the situation where by they will either change or disappear. '

    Obviously a mistake in this sentence, but it is not obvious where the mistake is.

    Documentaries and recent video i have seen raises serious questions as to the extent of the propaganda. Certainly at l;east some of their cities could be any modern city.

    That they do, or may, finance some of their neighbours is of no moment. The US finances Israel heavily, and they cannot by any measure considered a 'neighbour'. Or are you suggesting that the US may do as it pleases, and that others must do as the US wants?

    The US according to Jimmy Carter has invaded 100 odd countries with ithe intention of destabilising or destroying their governments.

    There is no evidence that Iran has invaded anybody in what, 200 years?

    I do not think that Iran is 'pure', nor do I think that they have an ideal government, but do not suggest that the US has anything to offer anybody.

    They don't, nor did they ever have.

    If Israel/US attack Iran I hope that it is enough to unite everybody who has had, or ought to have had a gut full of US aggression, and that they target the US mainland in their retaliation.