Archive for July, 2005

Off to Canberra

I’ll be in Canberra for the weekend so postings will cease until early next week. In my absence, feel free to offer thoughts in comments about the “TAFKATWOT” (The Artist Formerly Known as the War on Terror) or any other musings.

Check out this fascinating read by one of Israel’s top journalists, Gideon Levy. It’s an interview with the Palestinian Minister of Civil Affairs, Mohammed Dahlan.

And yes, political shenanigans are bound to happen in the nation’s capital. I expect to be offered the leadership of one political party, just not sure which one yet.

One’s man terrorist…

Prime Minister John Howard calls the IRA “terrorists” who “murdered people.” “The reason that the British security forces and police are so effective in responding to terrorist attacks”, he says, “is the bitter 30 years’ experience of dealing with the IRA. There was nothing heroic about the IRA campaign, although it is still shrouded in romanticism in the eyes of some.”

Let me get this straight. Howard is comfortable comparing the IRA struggle - brutal, criminal and uncompromising as it once was - to the recent London attacks, carried out by men with absolutely no comparative ideology, motives or ideals. It’s so politically convenient labelling every act of violence as a terrorist act, therefore negating any distinguishing reason or background. The London suicide bombers are completely irrelevant to the IRA campaign of the 1970s and 1980s. Once again, “we” are the unwitting victims of “them.”

Of course, Howard presented former “terrorist” Nelson Mandela with an Order of Australia in 1999.

Nearly there

It’s coming…

The only book likely to compete with Finkelstein’s explosive tome is Robert Fisk’s upcoming, “The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East“, out November 8.

Mumbai

While the Sydney Morning Herald mentions their monthly dose of disaster yarns on page one (today it’s the record breaking rainfall in Mumbai) Indian blogger Sixo paints a much clearer picture of the devastation. He’s clearly a rich man (or at least comfortable) as he talks about “my poor servant Neeta.”

UPDATE: Speaking of India, a number of Indian bloggers are expressing concern about the city of Gurgaon, centre of Western multinationals and “development.” But what about worker rights and police powers?

Our friends

“The U.S. Government is now openly supporting the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, an Iranian resistance movement designated as a terrorist organisation by the US State Department…This kind of hypocrisy reveals much about what the global “war on terror” is really about. It’s not a war against terror as such, but rather a war of terror to subdue resistance to the US designs in the region.”

William Van Wagenen, July 28, Electronic Iraq

Fate

Yasser Salihee was an Iraqi journalist. Joe was an American sniper. On June 24, 2005, fate brought them together on a Baghdad street. A fascinating Salon feature on modern day Iraq under occupation. Trigger happy US troops are causing such anguish and mayhem that any residual feelings of affection are dissipating by the day.

Jordan calling

Jordan has become the bridge between North America and Europe and the Middle East and bloggers are at the forefront of this debate. A recent bloggers meet-up proved the diversity of opinions and attitudes.

In response to those arguing that blogging is simply for the wealthy and well-connected, Jordanian bloggers have an idea: “A number of Jordanian bloggers are interested in organising outreach efforts through community internet access centres in rural areas, encouraging people to blog about community events, possibly using audio and photo blogging to make the process more accessible to less literate participants.”

The rules

“Senior media figures on the mainstream ‘left’ are where they are because they know how to play this game. The idea is to talk a good fight, to elicit applause from the ‘left’, but also quiet nods of acceptance from the media gatekeepers, the people they are supposed to be challenging. A key talent is to appear passionately radical while subtly indicating that one is not ’extreme’, that the rules of the media club are accepted. The first rule of media club is: Don’t talk about the inherent contradiction of a corporate ‘free press’. The second rule: Rule one does not exist. The third rule: Do not discuss the existence or non-existence of rules one and two.”

Medialens, July 27, The New Statesman Editor And Blair’s ‘Mistake’

Paying the price of peace

Peaceful protest of Israel’s “security” fence is deemed dangerous by Israeli forces, according to a stunning Haaretz report. Most disturbingly, numerous IDF soldiers have been caught lying about the circumstances in which Palestinians are arrested and making up false testimony about stone throwing and other violence.

Israel’s descent continues.

Bush To London bombers: "Bring It On"

WASHINGTON, DC—President Bush officially responded to the latest round of London transit bombings Monday, challenging terrorists to “do their worst.” Said Bush, in a televised statement from the Oval Office: “The proud and resilient people of London can take anything the forces of evil and cowardice can throw at them. They will never live in fear of you. Bring it on.” Prime Minister Tony Blair thanked Bush for his comments, inviting him to visit London and ride the Underground in a show of solidarity.

Bob Carr - friend of a war criminal

The “shock” resignation of NSW Premier Bob Carr has caused much of the press pack to compete for superlatives. I won’t even bother trying to compete with those hacks.

I met Carr a few years ago while researching Not Happy, John! about the Hanan Ashrawi affair. He had bravely resisted pressure from Zionists to withdraw his support from the Sydney Peace Prize. I found him engaging, interesting and knowledgeable. Our interview lasted around one hour in his stunning office overlooking the city. He struck me as more of a talker than listener.

My view of him has changed greatly in the years since. Since learning of his affection for “my good friend” Henry Kissinger, I’ve become even more aware of his love of being close to power. Kissinger represents the worst of the American establishment, a war criminal still feted by politicians the world over. What did Carr see in him? Hard to say, but I suspect it had something to do with the former Premier feeling close to the heart of his beloved America.

International relations expert Scott Burchill put it best in June 2004:

“I am sure what it is with the Right of the NSW ALP and their infatuation with US history. Perhaps they like to dress up as Minutemen and recreate battle scenes from the revolutionary war on their days off? They certainly don’t like talking about the extirpation of the native population or the overthrow of democratic governments in Iran and Guatemala by people they admire in Washington. Whatever the true nature of their infantile disorder, let’s not forget that Bob Carr regards unindicted war criminal Henry Kissinger as a mate - and invited him as a VIP to the Sydney Olympics. Carr still wants to be chief brown-noser inside the beltway next time his party gets to sit on the Treasury benches in Canberra. Until then, the pompous and insufferable bore is apparently going to lecture all and sundry about how America truly feels after 9/11 and how to manage the alliance accordingly. What a guy!”

Watch the Australian media completely ignore any of these facts. Too messy, too difficult, too unkind to his “legacy”.

Jordan’s first podcaster?

Ahmad Humeid is a Jordanian graphic designer, newspaper columnist and entrepreneur. Listen to his views about the opportunities for podcasting and blogging in the Arab world.

Stumbling in the dark

“MI5 tried to recruit senior al-Qaida figure Abu Qatada as an informer in a bid to keep terror off the streets of Britain, it was reported Wednesday.”

According to the UK Evening Standard, intelligence sources hoped that he “would not bite the hand that fed him” and “keep terrorism off the streets of the U.K.”

Let’s lay out the facts. The recent London bombings, both real and attempted, was a failure of the intelligence services. When citizens are killed and intelligence fails to pick up the signals, they’ve failed. But then, as we’ve learnt in Australia, governments are often only listening to information they want to receive, rather than alternate theories and ideas.

Of course, if you’re New York Times commentator and McCarthyist, Tom Friedman, the US government should draw up a list of individuals who believe that US actions may encourage violent reprisals.

Friedman is a man the Fairfax press publishes regularly, an acceptable “liberal” face of the American establishment. He is nothing of the sort, however, but rather the mouthpiece of well-connected Washingtonians. Who can forget his April 23, 1999 column during the war with Milosevic when he insisted “every power grid, water pipe, bridge, road and war-related factory has to be targeted.” Friedman supported the US military committing war crimes, but what did he care?

News flash!

What are the war cheerleaders going to do? Where will they turn for the appropriate turn of phase now that the Bush administration has announced that the term “war on terror” will be phased out for more nuanced language.

“As the struggle evolves some of the language will evolve as well,” a senior Administration official said. ” The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Richard Myers, said this week that he “objected to the use of the term ‘war on terrorism’ because if you call it a war, then you think of people in uniform as being the solution”. The solution, he offered, was “more diplomatic, more economic, more political than it is military”.

Let’s give the Bush administration a head start in picking more hilariously simplistic terminology. Suggestions in comments. Allow me to start:

“Battle against hypocritical Western nations determined to play the friendship card when it suits - ie. Uzbekistan - and the scary face when it doesn’t”;

“Really aggressive stance against Islamic fundamentalism and a less aggressive stance against US-backed militias in Iraq”; and

“The right has won, the left has lost and the military budget should increase even further. Soldier on! Let’s militarise space.”

"Our man" in the "war on terror"

“Our military, police and other law enforcement agencies have completely shattered al-Qaida’s vertical and horizontal links. It no longer has any command, communication and propaganda structure in Pakistan.”

Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf, July 2005

No peacenik

Jane Fonda announced this week that she opposes the Iraq war and will be touring America spreading that message. Good for her. “I have not taken a stand on any war since Vietnam,” she recently told 600 people at a bookshop in Santa Fe. “I carry a lot of baggage from that.”

David Bloom deconstructs this distortion of the historical record. He remembers Fonda and then husband Tom Hayden visiting Beirut in 1982 and praising the brutal Israeli invasion.

Read the whole report.

Lord Howard visits the troops

While Prime Minister Howard visits the Australian troops in Iraq - and the media pack breathlessly report the details of the “wildest ride of his life” - he refuses to announce any timetable for withdrawal.

Back on planet Earth, and with increasing reports of civil war on the cards, calls for US withdrawal is growing louder. New York Times veteran John F. Burns reported last weekend that Shiite militias and Shiite and Kurdish-led army and police units, often backed by US and British forces, were themselves launching aggressive measures to tackle the insurgency, including kidnapping, torture and extra-judicial killing. And this would be different from the days of Saddam?

A Western-friendly government in Baghdad is unlikely in the long run. Ask Howard, Bush and Blair how they’d feel about an administration with close ties to “axis of evil” Iran? Howard visited Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari “in his capital, in his office as the democratic prime minister of Iraq”. More than a week since Seymour Hersh published his revelations surrounding American attempts to subvert the January elections, the Australian media continues to ignore the scoop.

I read the story again last night. If anybody, including Howard and his media cheerleaders, truly believe that the current Iraqi leadership was democratically elected, they’re as deluded as believing the existence of WMD.

A long way to go

While our leaders prepare to “deal” with Islamic extremism - and yet completely ignore any discussion about the foreign policy goals of the Howard government - a more disturbing report closer to home suggests that a great number of Australians hold homophobic views.

Queensland and Tasmania are the most bigoted states while Victoria is the least so. Males between the ages of 14 and 17 hold highly homophobic views and surprisingly, Catholics were least likely of the faithful to harbour fear and hatred of homosexuals. This result should shame us all:

“Overall, 35 per cent of respondents were intolerant of homosexuality. Four in 10 people surveyed in southern Sydney - almost half of men - described gay relationships as immoral. This compared with 27 per cent in the northern suburbs, 34.5 per cent in the west and 37.5 per cent in the south-west.”

How much is too much?

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan may end up costing the US over $700 billion. “Osama bin Laden doesn’t have to win; he will just bleed us to death,” says Michael Scheuer, former counterterrorism official at the CIA who led the search for bin Laden and recently retired after writing two books critical of the Clinton and Bush administrations. “He’s well on his way to doing it.”

Working together is essential

In the wake of increasingly vicious anti-Muslim sentiment within the Australian community and the decision of a leading Islamic body to send letters to 200 Muslim clerics and leaders asking them to repudiate violence, racial harmony is hardly served by comments by The Anglican Bishop of South Sydney, Robert Forsyth. The Sydney Morning Herald reports that “he had no time for Islam, whose teachings he believed were false.” Can you imagine the outcry if a leading Muslim leader announced on national television that Christianity was a pagan religion, based on superstition and a death cult?

Having said that, the spectacle of Melbourne’s Sheikh Mohomed Omran on ABC Lateline last night was an intriguing sight. His answers were vague, contradictory and confused when asked about terrorism, September 11 and Bin Laden. Host Tony Jones, though, was so aggressive - would he ever ask John Howard if he condemned American bombing raids in suburban Baghdad or Israeli incursions into Palestinian territory? - Omran almost had to convince viewers why he should be allowed to stay in Australia.

If people like Jones think the real problem in 2005 is an individual like Sheikh Omran, they’re sadly mistaken. But then, it’s far too confronting to assess Western culpability.

UPDATE: Hundreds of Muslims have considered leaving England after the London bombings, according to a Guardian poll. The fear of an anti-Muslim backlash is real.




This is a non-profit site dedicated to providing timely and challenging material. Any financial contributions would be greatly appreciated, however, to sustain hosting costs and the life of a freelance journalist.
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from AntonyLoewenstein. Make your own badge here.



Global Voices Advocacy
Dogpile Search



Close
E-mail It