Postmodern relativism!

“Journalists however usually make others the subject of their enquiry.”

Which journalists are you referring to? Go on. Don’t be scared.

Now if you will only come clean with an explanation as to what it is you want AL to come clean about.

Journalists however usually make others the subject of their enquiry. Not so with Ant and hence the onus on him to come clean.

“Real journalists would answer such questions.”

What real journaalist are you referring to Psydoc? Tim Blair? What journalists have come clean about their own complicity in selling the war to the public, and continuing to give free passes to governments who lie repeartedly and get away with their authority unblemished?

Who are these jouiranlists that don’t repeat government BS as if it were fact. Do tell.

You continue to maintain that AL owes somethign to you and the public, without ever explaining what that means. It’s a shame you don’t hold those with real power to the same accountability.

You really are a hypocrite Psydoc.

It must be very comforting for Ant that the most erudite response in his defense comes from a sycopANT who needs to refer to my penis size.

He does have a case to answer just as he puts those under close scrutiny whom he believes to act unethically.

The Macquarie University episode is an indictment on tertiary education.

I wonder if we took a poll how many Tim Blariistes would say they believed Iran had nukes. Psydoc seems to think it’s a given.

Once again, ideology trumps logic, reason and evidence.

Who was making that argument? I doubt the Afrikaaners in power were. Anyway, sure, nothing is static. However some problems are more intractable than others, and we’re talking about some rather insurmountable cultural differences that, in my analysis, are unlikely to erode with time. Due to the cultural traits of many Muslim Palestinians, I strongly doubt they will ever agree to live in an entity called Israel, even if relations between Palestinians and Israelis improves and even if they’re guaranteed equal rights. In my estimation, a two state solution is the only acceptable outcome for both sides now and into the future.

Thus, I think it’s extremely difficult to say “I support the continued existence of Israel and I support a one state solution.” Keeping those two balls in the air isn’t possible now and in the future, by my reckoning. You may not agree, but there you go. Anyway, that was the topic at hand, and that’s what I was commenting on. Perceived injustices etc I wasn’t.

You mean he’s a SPtBYRD?
(Small Penis tim Blair Yapping Running Dog)

Only at Blair’s would he be able to brag.

I am confused by what people mean by a “bi-national secular state.” Maybe I am being naive but surely “state” and “bi-national” are contradictory?

Also what do people mean by a “secular” state. I have started reading Noam Chomsky and he often talks about a “bi-national secular state.” What does this mean? How is it different from the current situation?