<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the hustings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: orang</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269206</link>
		<dc:creator>orang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269206</guid>
		<description>They may be terrorists, but they are "our" terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may be terrorists, but they are &#8220;our&#8221; terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Condell</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269203</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Condell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269203</guid>
		<description>Most of Israel's leaders, Sharon will end up being the last of them, were members of terrorist organisations like Stern, Irgun, Betar etc. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But that of course was different!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of Israel&#8217;s leaders, Sharon will end up being the last of them, were members of terrorist organisations like Stern, Irgun, Betar etc. </p>
<p>But that of course was different!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orang</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269168</link>
		<dc:creator>orang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269168</guid>
		<description>Listen, they're all the same . The fill-in charmer of Huffington is witholding the Pali's money, because they're "terrorists". Well f*ck him as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, they&#8217;re all the same . The fill-in charmer of Huffington is witholding the Pali&#8217;s money, because they&#8217;re &#8220;terrorists&#8221;. Well f*ck him as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wombat</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269160</link>
		<dc:creator>Wombat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269160</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I think it was significant that his first words in response to 911 was that it was "very good".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I think it was significant that his first words in response to 911 was that it was &#8220;very good&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smiths</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269158</link>
		<dc:creator>smiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269158</guid>
		<description>i may be proven wrong but i think that netanyahu is a far more dangerous figure to have in charge than sharon, its not that he is more right wing, i just think he is totally amoral, a very sinister figure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i may be proven wrong but i think that netanyahu is a far more dangerous figure to have in charge than sharon, its not that he is more right wing, i just think he is totally amoral, a very sinister figure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orang</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269157</link>
		<dc:creator>orang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269157</guid>
		<description>Pretty predictable. Notice on the link there's a page;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/676173.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"Israel says it won't transfer January tax revenues to PA&lt;br/&gt;By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Israel will not transfer this past month's tax revenues earmarked for the Palestinian Authority, a senior government source in Jerusalem said Sunday."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well it is their money, but f*ck it you just can't take the risk. They'll be spending it on death camps and ovens. This is our survival at stake. Our back is to the sea.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And this is a real gem;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"According to a senior diplomatic source, "The main consideration in favor of transferring the money is that this is Palestinian money." He went on to say halting payments would not constitute a violation of agreements with the PA, because Israel agreed to transfer tax money solely to former PA Finance Minister Salem Fayyad. "Since Fayyad resigned, the agreement is no longer valid," he said."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So there you go. Beautiful. It's their money, so we should give it to them. But we only give to one guy. If that guy's not around, we keep it. That's fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty predictable. Notice on the link there&#8217;s a page;<br /><a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/676173.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/676173.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Israel says it won&#8217;t transfer January tax revenues to PA<br />By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent</p>
<p>Israel will not transfer this past month&#8217;s tax revenues earmarked for the Palestinian Authority, a senior government source in Jerusalem said Sunday.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well it is their money, but f*ck it you just can&#8217;t take the risk. They&#8217;ll be spending it on death camps and ovens. This is our survival at stake. Our back is to the sea.</p>
<p>And this is a real gem;</p>
<p>&#8220;According to a senior diplomatic source, &#8220;The main consideration in favor of transferring the money is that this is Palestinian money.&#8221; He went on to say halting payments would not constitute a violation of agreements with the PA, because Israel agreed to transfer tax money solely to former PA Finance Minister Salem Fayyad. &#8220;Since Fayyad resigned, the agreement is no longer valid,&#8221; he said.&#8221;</p>
<p>So there you go. Beautiful. It&#8217;s their money, so we should give it to them. But we only give to one guy. If that guy&#8217;s not around, we keep it. That&#8217;s fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viva Peace</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269154</link>
		<dc:creator>Viva Peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/01/30/on-the-hustings/#comment-269154</guid>
		<description>It would be a mistake to go back to Netanyahu. Even though Hamas's past rhetoric has not been very helpful, I think once they actually have legitimate political power they will be more reasonable. Still some basic ground rules need to be established before Israel should even consider talks. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Without an unambiguous declaration of Israel's right to exist within, at least, 1967 borders, Israel would be mad to even acknowledge Hamas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a mistake to go back to Netanyahu. Even though Hamas&#8217;s past rhetoric has not been very helpful, I think once they actually have legitimate political power they will be more reasonable. Still some basic ground rules need to be established before Israel should even consider talks. </p>
<p>Without an unambiguous declaration of Israel&#8217;s right to exist within, at least, 1967 borders, Israel would be mad to even acknowledge Hamas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
