Comments on: Some occupation http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:27:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: orang http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-899 orang Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:33:58 +0000 http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-899 "Unsurprisingly, his regime quickly fell to outside attack, proving to be the "cakewalk" that many analysts, including myself, had expected. That six-week victory remains a glory of American foreign policy and of the coalition forces. It also represents a personal achievement for President Bush, who made the key decisions." Ladies and gentlemen, here we have a human maggot who proudly sucks the scum of a retarded chimps smegma, licks his lips and says what a good boy am I. Thousands of Internet Porn sites while vying for exclusives are trying to figure out what category to put this behaviour into - is it Bestiality perhaps? Sado-Masochism is obvious, is there an element of self hate? Will there be movie? Daniel does <strike>Dallas</strike> Crawford. “Unsurprisingly, his regime quickly fell to outside attack, proving to be the “cakewalk” that many analysts, including myself, had expected. That six-week victory remains a glory of American foreign policy and of the coalition forces. It also represents a personal achievement for President Bush, who made the key decisions.”

Ladies and gentlemen, here we have a human maggot who proudly sucks the scum of a retarded chimps smegma, licks his lips and says what a good boy am I. Thousands of Internet Porn sites while vying for exclusives are trying to figure out what category to put this behaviour into - is it Bestiality perhaps? Sado-Masochism is obvious, is there an element of self hate? Will there be movie? Daniel does Dallas Crawford.

]]> By: Addamo http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-880 Addamo Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:37:22 +0000 http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-880 You make a compelling argument Edward. I think Christopher Hitchens and Bill Pristol serve similar purposes. They are the litmus test of public opinion. I still an trying toget my heaed around Pipes asserting that the reconstruction (ie. th erebulding of pretty much everything the US broke) is not the concern of the occupation. You make a compelling argument Edward. I think Christopher Hitchens and Bill Pristol serve similar purposes. They are the litmus test of public opinion.

I still an trying toget my heaed around Pipes asserting that the reconstruction (ie. th erebulding of pretty much everything the US broke) is not the concern of the occupation.

]]> By: Progressive_Atheist http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-879 Progressive_Atheist Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:07:17 +0000 http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-879 <em>Civil war in Iraq, in short, would be a humanitarian tragedy but not a strategic one.</em> What Pipes means is that while a civil war in Iraq would be a humanitarian disaster, it would be strategically useful to the Zionist cause. He is giving the game away that civil war in Iraq is in Israel's interest. Civil war in Iraq, in short, would be a humanitarian tragedy but not a strategic one.

What Pipes means is that while a civil war in Iraq would be a humanitarian disaster, it would be strategically useful to the Zionist cause. He is giving the game away that civil war in Iraq is in Israel’s interest.

]]> By: edward squire http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-877 edward squire Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:37:03 +0000 http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-877 Does anyone get the feeling that Pipes is the moral canary down the mineshaft: how will people react if we blame the IRAQIS for the shithole we created, thereby justifying our getting out without any responsibility for even looking back? If the Pipes line flies in the U.S., I reckon we can expect to see the troops home sooner than previously recogned (i.e. never). Does anyone get the feeling that Pipes is the moral canary down the mineshaft: how will people react if we blame the IRAQIS for the shithole we created, thereby justifying our getting out without any responsibility for even looking back?

If the Pipes line flies in the U.S., I reckon we can expect to see the troops home sooner than previously recogned (i.e. never).

]]> By: Addamo http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-873 Addamo Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:52:42 +0000 http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/01/some-occupation/#comment-873 Daniel Pipes has to be the biggest moron in the Northern hemisphere next to William Kristol. yesterday, Kritol was saying that the Us occupation hadn't been fighting "seriously enough" for hte past three years and that we needed more troops in Iraq. and then we have Pipes, the village idiot, declaring that we were in iraq to right wrongs but nonethelsss the wrongs our people did shoudl be overlooked. What Pipes seem to ignore is that the Us set aside a budget for reconstruction that was entirely squandered and blown on security. and boy, does this guy show his true colours. apart from the fact that the statement cointradicts the por war stance that the invasino was to spread democracy, he shows utter contempt for huamn life when it's that of an Arab. How on earth can the adventure in Iraq not be a strategic disaster (describes as such by people far better positioned to know than he) if it is a humanitarian one? How can democracy and freedom even get to first base under the burden of bloodshed? Daniel Pipes has to be the biggest moron in the Northern hemisphere next to William Kristol.

yesterday, Kritol was saying that the Us occupation hadn’t been fighting “seriously enough” for hte past three years and that we needed more troops in Iraq. and then we have Pipes, the village idiot, declaring that we were in iraq to right wrongs but nonethelsss the wrongs our people did shoudl be overlooked.

What Pipes seem to ignore is that the Us set aside a budget for reconstruction that was entirely squandered and blown on security. and boy, does this guy show his true colours. apart from the fact that the statement cointradicts the por war stance that the invasino was to spread democracy, he shows utter contempt for huamn life when it’s that of an Arab.

How on earth can the adventure in Iraq not be a strategic disaster (describes as such by people far better positioned to know than he) if it is a humanitarian one? How can democracy and freedom even get to first base under the burden of bloodshed?

]]>