<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice try, but</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>And it is clear that no one here "gives a fuck" what you think. Happy? By the way, your values are not valued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it is clear that no one here &#8220;gives a fuck&#8221; what you think. Happy? By the way, your values are not valued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stev</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>Stev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>Well said Addamo. 

Chris, if everyone disagrees with me and nobody here (or in the world - it's hard to tell just what group you're claiming to speak for) values creativity in the least, then hey - that's fine with me. I value what I value and, quite frankly, don't give a fuck what other people make of my values. Just as I don't give a fuck if you don't value creativity.

That said, my values &lt;strong&gt;are&lt;/strong&gt; valued. Just as your values are valued. There are enough people in the world that at least some of the values that any single person has are valued by somebody else.

But you should know that your response - reading my querying of what &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; value, and responding by making a blanket claim that basically amounts to 'no one cares what you think' is bordering on pathological. I doubt very much you're going to read that and think 'you know, you're right' and look at addressing your issues, but I had to say it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Addamo. </p>
<p>Chris, if everyone disagrees with me and nobody here (or in the world - it&#8217;s hard to tell just what group you&#8217;re claiming to speak for) values creativity in the least, then hey - that&#8217;s fine with me. I value what I value and, quite frankly, don&#8217;t give a fuck what other people make of my values. Just as I don&#8217;t give a fuck if you don&#8217;t value creativity.</p>
<p>That said, my values <strong>are</strong> valued. Just as your values are valued. There are enough people in the world that at least some of the values that any single person has are valued by somebody else.</p>
<p>But you should know that your response - reading my querying of what <em>you</em> value, and responding by making a blanket claim that basically amounts to &#8216;no one cares what you think&#8217; is bordering on pathological. I doubt very much you&#8217;re going to read that and think &#8216;you know, you&#8217;re right&#8217; and look at addressing your issues, but I had to say it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addamo</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Addamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think it is your values which are not valued.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

According to whom Chris?  You assumign some position of authirity again?  What ever leads you to believe that you speak for others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think it is your values which are not valued.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to whom Chris?  You assumign some position of authirity again?  What ever leads you to believe that you speak for others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>I think it is your values which are not valued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is your values which are not valued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stev</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator>Stev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2481</guid>
		<description>Are you claiming that meaning is not subjective? Or that using a word over and over in no way dilutes its meaning? Or is it just 'mediocre' that's immune to dilution of meaning? What exactly are you claiming here?

It's not just that it's not creative enough for me, it's not &lt;strong&gt;at all&lt;/strong&gt; creative. In no way can using the same word over and over again be construed as creative. But hey, if you don't value creativity that's cool with me. Each to their own I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you claiming that meaning is not subjective? Or that using a word over and over in no way dilutes its meaning? Or is it just &#8216;mediocre&#8217; that&#8217;s immune to dilution of meaning? What exactly are you claiming here?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just that it&#8217;s not creative enough for me, it&#8217;s not <strong>at all</strong> creative. In no way can using the same word over and over again be construed as creative. But hey, if you don&#8217;t value creativity that&#8217;s cool with me. Each to their own I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>As something subjective can not be called factual, perceived is the proper usage. That it is not creative enough for you is not something that anyone need be worried about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As something subjective can not be called factual, perceived is the proper usage. That it is not creative enough for you is not something that anyone need be worried about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stev</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Stev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>You're right, I should. But I stand by points 2 and -.

'The moderator'? Do you mean Ant? Are you trying to sound obsequious? I don't believe Ant has mentioned anything specifically to me about calling people names as I've not called people names. But I abide by the requests that have been directed to all here, namely civility. I don't endorse calling people names. All I said was 'if you're going to call people names' (which clearly you are) at least be creative about it so we can get some entertainment out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I should. But I stand by points 2 and -.</p>
<p>&#8216;The moderator&#8217;? Do you mean Ant? Are you trying to sound obsequious? I don&#8217;t believe Ant has mentioned anything specifically to me about calling people names as I&#8217;ve not called people names. But I abide by the requests that have been directed to all here, namely civility. I don&#8217;t endorse calling people names. All I said was &#8216;if you&#8217;re going to call people names&#8217; (which clearly you are) at least be creative about it so we can get some entertainment out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2386</guid>
		<description>Stev 
Mar 21st, 2006 at 9:38 am

What’s your obsession with the word ‘mediocre’ by the way?

**********************************************  

You should reread your posts before questioning what you, yourself, said.

I believe the moderator has mentioned to you not to call people names, creatively or otherwise. I suggest you heed his request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stev<br />
Mar 21st, 2006 at 9:38 am</p>
<p>What’s your obsession with the word ‘mediocre’ by the way?</p>
<p>**********************************************  </p>
<p>You should reread your posts before questioning what you, yourself, said.</p>
<p>I believe the moderator has mentioned to you not to call people names, creatively or otherwise. I suggest you heed his request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stev</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Stev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>That's all you've got? Damn. And I was so hoping for you to pull a Doctorate in Middle Eastern Politics out of your ass.

a. Who said anything about obsessive?
2. perceived meaning is subjective, as is the dilution of said meaning
- I don't find it annoying, I just think it's uncreative. If you're going to go around calling people names, at least come up with something fresh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all you&#8217;ve got? Damn. And I was so hoping for you to pull a Doctorate in Middle Eastern Politics out of your ass.</p>
<p>a. Who said anything about obsessive?<br />
2. perceived meaning is subjective, as is the dilution of said meaning<br />
- I don&#8217;t find it annoying, I just think it&#8217;s uncreative. If you&#8217;re going to go around calling people names, at least come up with something fresh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/03/18/nice-try-but/#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>The use of the term 'mediocre, 6 or 7 times, is neither ossesive, not does it dilute its meaning. It just seems to be annoying to you, and reviewing your previous posts, there seems to be no reason to discontinue its use based on it being annoying to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of the term &#8216;mediocre, 6 or 7 times, is neither ossesive, not does it dilute its meaning. It just seems to be annoying to you, and reviewing your previous posts, there seems to be no reason to discontinue its use based on it being annoying to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
