Archive for August, 2007

Praying for success (but knowing failure)

Iraq is a success. Democracy is soon to flower. The US strategy is correct. The Australian government’s support of this plan is supportable. General David Petraeus is a master.

No, it’s not a White House press release, it’s a handful of Australian “journalists” who received “exclusive” access to the General in Baghdad. The Murdoch broadsheet:

The US troop surge in Iraq has thrown al-Qa’ida off balance and produced a dramatic reduction in sectarian killings and a drop in roadside bombings.

David Petraeus, the top US commander in Iraq, said the build-up of American forces in Baghdad since late January had produced positive outcomes. These included the killing or capture of al-Qa’ida fighters, causing the terrorist group to lose influence with local Sunnis.

The strategic gains against insurgents would lead to a changed and possibly longer-term role for Australian troops, shifting from security operations to a focus on training Iraqi soldiers and police.

General Petraeus told The Australian during a face-to-face interview at his Baghdad headquarters there had been a 75 per cent reduction in religious and ethnic killings since last year, a doubling in the seizure of insurgents’ weapons caches between January and August, a rise in the number of al-Qa’ida “kills and captures” and a fall in the number of coalition deaths from roadside bombings.

“We say we have achieved progress, and we are obviously going to do everything we can to build on that progress and we believe al-Qa’ida is off balance at the very least,” he said.

The Fairfax broadsheets:

David Petraeus, the US military commander in Iraq, has given a preview of his forthcoming report to Congress, citing a dramatic reduction in violence in Baghdad and foreshadowing a “gradual” reduction in the number of troops in Iraq.

The Herald interviewed General Petraeus in Baghdad on Wednesday after he had a 90-minute meeting with the Defence Minister, Brendan Nelson, and Chief of the Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston.

General Petraeus revealed the thinking behind his report, due on September 10, on President George Bush’s “surge” strategy of increasing the number of US troops in Iraq, and divulged several measures of progress.

“We say we have achieved progress and will do all we can to build on that progress, [and] that al-Qaeda is off balance and we are certainly pressuring them,” General Petraeus said.

The shamelessness of these “reports” are laughable.

Let me paint a picture. The Australian Defense Minister Brendan Nelson is going to Iraq. He wants a handful of clueless propagandists to come along and shore up flagging support for the war. They spend a few hours in Baghdad’s Green Zone, speak to virtually no Iraqis, hear rosy pictures about Iraq’s future, and describe these breathless exclusives. Bingo. John Howard is a genius, one says, those Bush haters and anti-war activists should get a new line.

The reality? It’s barely worth repeating. Over one million dead Iraqis, millions are displaced in the Middle East and within the country itself, ethnic cleansing pollutes many communities, and in another new report, the US is detaining so many Iraqis since the “surge” was announced that Iraqis are wondering how many other Abu-Ghraibs are waiting to be discovered. And let’s not even mention the fact that al-Qaeda is a tiny fraction of the insurgency (most are native Iraqis.) Likewise that the vast majority of foreign fighters are Saudis, not Iranians. Minor details, I know.

The fact that Australia’s major media companies are willing to print such deluded and dishonest reports suggests that restoring American “prestige” is their only focus. In fact, it proves that the Australian media is little more than a parochial back-water, happy to publish White House slops.

Sorry about maiming you, little girl

Israeli government humanity:

A Jerusalem rehabilitation center is defying a government order to transfer a Palestinian girl paralyzed in an Israel Defense Forces attack on militants to a hospital in the West Bank.

Maria Amin, who turns six on Thursday, cannot get the care she needs in the Palestinian facility “so she won’t be going anywhere” until her well-being is assured, said Shirley Meyer of the Alyn Hospital Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem.

Maria was paralyzed from the neck down when the car she was traveling in was caught in a missile attack on a leader of the Islamic Jihad militant group in Gaza in May last year. Her mother, grandmother and older brother were killed.

She was taken for treatment to Israel where the Defense Ministry covered her medical expenses and sponsored her father and younger brother to live with her at the hospital. She has now completed a rehabilitation program.

It’s not as if Israelis are killing children in Gaza.

Smearing the other

A few days ago I spoke in Sydney alongside the Mayor of Bethlehem. He is a dignified man who talked about the effects of the Israeli occupation on his town. Simply put, Israel is killing the holy city.

In today’s Murdoch’s Australian national broadcast, a little propagandist outlines the faux outrage that has greeted the proposed sister-city relationship between the West Bank town of Hebron and Leichhart Council in Sydney’s inner-west. Yet again, the Jewish community is concerned that Australians may actually find out more information about true apartheid in the occupied territories. If anybody visits the town, and sees graffiti written by fundamentalist settlers such as “Arabs to the gas chambers”, using the term apartheid is actually an understatement.

Then the article features this:

At a pro-Palestinian meeting at the University of Sydney on Tuesday evening, Dr Batarseh repeated his claim that the Israeli security barrier, which runs through Bethlehem, is intended to steal Palestinian land rather then keep out suicide attacks.

The 90-strong crowd at the event applauded when a member of the audience called for “the complete destruction of Israel”.

This is a complete lie. I was at the event and I’m fairly confident that the journalist was not. An audience member did indeed call for the destruction of Israel, but the vast majority of the audience remained silent after his statement. The Mayor of Bethlehem specifically responded by arguing that such statements were counter-productive and not very helpful. And wrong. The lengths to which so-called respectable media will go to smear anybody who dares support the Palestinian cause continues unabated.

Outpatients lining up behind Giuliani

He might look comparatively moderate next to Norman Podhoretz, but Daniel Pipes is no wall flower when it comes to right wing extremism, promoting Islamophobia and persecuting those he disagrees with, an honour he shares with another lover of humanity, David Horowitz.

Evidently, none of these nutters bother Giuliani. On the contrary, he seems to have a fondness for their brand of ideology, which is why he keeps hiring them.

I think it’s fair to say that Pipes is even further out ideologically than Norman Podhoretz, another Giuliani adviser. Readers unfamiliar with Pipes can check out his profile at Wikipedia. For a representative sampling of his work, consider a 2006 article he wrote in the Jerusalem Post (not available online):

Iraq’s plight is neither a coalition responsibility nor a particular danger to the West. Fixing Iraq is neither the coalition’s responsibility, nor its burden. When Sunni terrorists target Shi’ites and vice versa, non-Muslims are less likely to be hurt. Civil war in Iraq, in short, would be a humanitarian tragedy, but not a strategic one.

As you can see, the lives of Arabs and Muslims is of little concern for dear Daniel.

Fact time

Dissident historian Norman Finkelstein’s last class at De Paul University is cancelled.

Daniel Pipes is now working for Republican presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani.

The Zionist lobby has no negative effect on the US body politic (if you’re deaf, blind and dumb.)

EU officials holding talks with Hamas

One has to wonder what Washington’s reaction will be to any agreement the EU strike with Hamas.

According to the sources, the Hamas leaders urged the EU representatives to work to end the boycott of the Hamas government in the Gaza Strip, and to pressure Israel to reopen the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt.

“We hope these talks will be the first step toward ending the boycott of Hamas, which came to power in a free and democratic election,” the sources told the Post. “There is growing awareness among the Europeans of the fact that Hamas can’t be ignored as a major player in the Palestinian arena.”

For that matter, what will Israel’s response be?

Only in America

Not something you would expect to see. Those red dots correspond to recipients of agricultural farm subsidies - in Manhattan of all places.

The larger red blobs mark people receiving more than a quarter of a million dollars in farm subsidies annually.

The farm bill passed by House Democrats in July would continue giving millionaires farm subsidies (setting the income threshold for payments at $1 million a year, and keeping loopholes in place that allow some making much more to qualify). The Bush administration has proposed sharply reducing the income threshold to $200,000 a year and ending many of those loopholes. That would reduce the number of subsidy recipients by less than 40,000 (of the current million or so recipients)—though I suppose it might put some rooftop gardens on Park Avenue out of commission.

The Petraeus Report

A good summation of what to expect from the Petraeus Report (or rather the one written by the White House that Petraeus will be presenting).

The Washington Post reports that Gen. David Petraeus managed to get the recent intelligence assessment of Iraq toned down:

The NIE, requested by the White House Iraq coordinator, Lt. Gen. Douglas E. Lute, in preparation for the testimony, met with resistance from U.S. military officials in Baghdad, according to a senior U.S. military intelligence officer there. Presented with a draft of the conclusions, Petraeus succeeded in having the security judgments softened to reflect improvements in recent months, the official said.

This reminds me of something. I don’t remember if I’ve ever blogged about this before, but until recently my guess was that Petraeus’s September report to Congress would be pretty sober. My thinking was that he’s a smart guy, and realizes that trying to paint too pretty a picture would ruin his credibility. So instead he’d present a basically realistic assessment, but stud it with just enough signs of progress to convince everyone that he deserved more time to make the surge work.

Now I’m not so sure. Petraeus has been very shrewd about providing dog-and-pony shows to as many analysts, pundits, reporters, and members of Congress as he could cram into the military jets criss-crossing the Atlantic to Baghdad on a seemingly daily basis this summer. And those dog-and-pony shows don’t seem to have been subtle: rather, they’ve been hard-sell propositions complete with “classified” PowerPoint presentations (always a winner for people with more ego than common sense); visits to a handpicked selection of the most successful reconstruction teams in the country; a plainly deceptive implication that the surge played a role in the Anbar Awakening; feel-good stories about how local power generation is a good thing; the recent insistence that civilian casualties are down, which increasingly looks like a book-cooking scam that wouldn’t stand the light of day if Petraeus allowed independent agencies access to his data; and, of course, the ongoing campaign to scare everyone by kinda sorta claiming that Iran and al-Qaeda are ramping up their activities and then getting suddenly slippery whenever anyone asks if they have any real evidence for this.

Petraeus is still a smart guy. He won’t go too far overboard. But he’s obviously been treating the September report like a military operation, trying to generate as much good press and congressional change of heart as he possibly can in the weeks leading up to 9/11. I now expect him to provide just the opposite of what I thought before: a consistently upbeat report studded with just enough accomodations to reality to keep him from seeming completely ridiculous.

And the question is: Will everyone swoon? Or will they demand more than just anecdotal evidence and unsupported statistics? I hope for the latter, but I fear for the former.

ADL flips position again on Armenian genocide

This is truly pathetic.

A prominent US Jewish advocacy group has retracted its decision to call the mass killings of Armenians under the Ottoman Empire a genocide, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Friday.

“Although independent scholars may have reached a consensus about the genocide, in an effort to help accomplish the reconciliation (between Turkey and Armenia) there is room for further dispassionate scholarly examination of the details of those dark and terrible days,” the second statement read.

Just imagine the outrage that would erupt if someone were to suggested there was room for further dispassionate scholarly examination of the details of the Holocaust. Perhaps there will also be some declaration that recognising the Armenian genocide is anti-Semitic.

Marrickville meets Bethlehem, controversy erupts

My following article appears in today’s edition of Crikey:

Back in 2003, Palestinian Christian politician Hanan Ashrawi was awarded the Sydney Peace Prize. The Zionist establishment reacted with predictable apoplexy and accused her of supporting terrorism and not recognising the Jewish state.

After months of fruitless lobbying, then NSW Premier Bob Carr resisted Jewish pressure and presented Ashrawi her award. He later told me that the Zionist lobby “should be much more relaxed about the fact that, in a pluralist media, there will be criticisms of Israel appearing.”

Four years later, it seems that the Jewish community has learned nothing. When Sydney’s Marrickville Council announced in June it was achieving sister city status with the occupied Palestinian town of Bethlehem, the Zionist lobby went into overdrive.

They distorted the facts, argued the town was controlled by Hamas “terrorists” and said the Mayor of Bethlehem, Christian Dr Victor Batarseh, supported a militant group and should not be allowed into the country.

CEO of the Jewish Board of Deputies in New South Wales, Vic Alhadeff, peddled the usual tripe about Australian funds potentially “supporting terrorism”. The real agenda of Alhadeff and other Jewish leaders was to smear a Palestinian moderate who dares to challenge a brutal Israeli military occupation that is strangulating the holy city.

A five-person delegation arrived from Bethlehem this week after Australian officials in Israel delayed issuing visas until the last minute.

Crikey has been told that Jewish leaders had actively lobbied Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews to not provide the visas and even Minister for the Environment Malcolm Turnbull pressured Andrews to delay making any decision (Turnbull’s seat of Wentworth, according to the 2006 Census, now contains the greatest number of Jews in the country).

One of the organisers of the visit told me he’d written to Andrews politely but firmly asking if only “Muslim-bashers like Wafa Sultan” were allowed into the country.

Despite the fear that the delegation would “adversely affect” the local Jewish community – who knew that hearing inconvenient truths could so upset the delicate Jewish sensibility? – Australia appears to have survived the onslaught (though the Mayor had to face a hostile ABC PM interview a few nights ago, host Mark Colvin demanding that he condemn “terrorism”.)

Last night at Sydney University, the Mayor spoke to a large crowd alongside Palestinian writer Randa Abdul-Fattah and myself.

Dr Batarseh said he accepted the concept of a two-state solution, but wondered why the international community demanded the Palestinians recognise Israel when successive Israeli governments had never accepted the right of the Palestinians to live in an unoccupied land, as settlement expansion continued daily.

He told of the “apartheid” wall and its envelopment of Bethlehem, the devastation of Palestinian olive groves, the 60-65% unemployment rate, the fall in essential tourism and his desire to see peace between both peoples.

A dignified man with grey hair, the Mayor reiterated the necessary refrain that criticism of Israeli policies is not anti-Semitism.

If the Zionist establishment truly believes in peace, they should be welcoming the Bethlehem delegation as a necessary bridge between the warring sides.

Who exactly is the destabilising force in the Middle East?

George Bush gave one of his less coherent, but nonetheless more disturbing speeches this week, and virtually declared war on Iran.

President Bush gave warning last night that Iran’s pursuit of the atomic bomb could lead to a nuclear holocaust in the Middle East, and promised to confront Tehran “before it is too late”.

What would a Bush speech be without baseless accusation, misleading talking points or outright lies?

“Iran’s pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust. “Iran’s actions threaten the security of nations everywhere, and the United States is rallying friends and allies to isolate Iran’s regime to impose economic sanctions. We will confront this danger before it is too late.”

So in typical fashion, Bush’s recipe for a region already known for instability and violence is to create more of it. The last time I checked, it was the US that invaded Iraq, not Iran, yet according to Bush, it is Iran that is meddling in Iraq.

And he goes on:

“I will take all actions necessary to protect our troops,” he said. “I have authorized our military commanders in Iraq to confront Tehran’s murderous activities.”

Translation: We are looking for any reason to escalate the hostility with Iran into a reason to bomb their country back to the stone age.

As for a taste of what Washington is planning for Iran, see for yourself what the disturbed minds in Bush’s administration are dreaming up.

Our masterstroke

Isn’t liberation a beautiful thing?

More than four million Iraqis have fled their homes because of sectarian violence, the largest population movement in the Middle East since Palestinians left the new state of Israel, the United Nations refugee agency said on Tuesday.

“An estimated 4.2 million Iraqis have been uprooted from their homes, with the monthly rate of displacement climbing to over 60,000 people compared to 50,000 previously,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) spokeswoman Jennifer Pagonis told journalists.

More than two million Iraqis are displaced within their own country, with around half being uprooted following the February 2006 Samarra bombings, seen as the catalyst for the latest wave of sectarian conflict, the UNHCR said.

Yes, Iran certainly needs the Iraq treatment.

A terror for our time

My latest New Matilda column is about the disintegration of the Iraqi state:

Andrew Bolt wrote in his Herald Sun column last week: ‘Almost unacknowledged by the Australian media, the tide in Iraq is turning. We can now dare to think Iraq will indeed survive as a democracy.’

How delightful it must be to walk in Bolt’s shoes. A shameless booster of the Iraq War, tireless defender of George W Bush and his policies, and brave fighter against Islamofascism, the Murdoch columnist was recently as excited as a cadet — confident that the ‘surge’ had finally vindicated the War Party’s tactics.

For a man who’s spent a few hours in Baghdad’s Green Zone with Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and who’s seen first hand the brilliance of US military strategy, Washington’s approved spin was terribly comforting. The price has been worth it, after all. The estimated million civilian deaths since 2003, four million refugees dispersed across the Middle East and the nearly one million internal refugees could be ignored. American ‘prestige’ was intact.

But Bolt is an irrelevance. The reality on the ground makes his ignorant pronouncements obscene. Iraq, even as a barely functioning entity, no longer exists. Whole communities are being ethnically cleansed. Sunni and Shi’ite death squads — supported variously by the US, Iran and a host of other nations — have recognised the most important fact of all: that America no longer controls the situation, its power drained after years of inept planning and criminal negligence.

My New Matilda archive is here.

The sleazy details behind Allawi’s campaign

Arianna Huffington sums up the ugly truth surrounding Allawi’s campaign to ouster the Malaki government and assume the job for himself.

First, there is the detail about whom Allawi is aiming his campaign.

He clearly knows that despite Bush’s bathetic paeans to Iraqi sovereignty, the real deciders in Iraq are not the Iraqi people, but a few dozen folks in the White House and the Pentagon. They are Allawi’s true constituency.

So those purple fingers meant nothing after all?

But what about the $300,000 he is paying to Barbour Griffith & Rogers, Philip Zelikow’s lobbying firm?

When Blitzer asked Allawi who is paying for the $300,000 Barbour Griffith & Rogers lobbying contract, Allawi wouldn’t say. He was only willing to disclose that the “payment is made by an Iraqi person who was a supporter of us, of the INA, of myself, of our program, and he has supported this wholeheartedly, without any strings attached.”

As Spencer Ackerman of TPMmuckracker wrote, perhaps it’s being financed by Allawi’s old buddy Hazem Shaalan, who Allawi appointed as his defense minister. Shaalan is currently fighting charges that he stole $1 billion from the Iraqi defense budget (out of a total of $1.3 billion). That’s some way to endear yourself to the Iraqi people.

Wouldn’t that be fitting? Funds stolen from Iraq’s defense ministry (provided by Washington of course), are being used to bribe Washington power brokers to sell the idea of overthrowing Iraq’s so-called democratically elected government.

There is also the fact that on the eve of the Petraeus report on the state of the surge, the Allawi Coup may serve a secondary purpose to the Bush administration. Not only will Petraeus not be writing the report he is supposed to deliver, but it was revealed that he massaged the NIE to make it sound more rosy. The implication of a close colleague of Petraeus in the illicit sale and delivery of billions of dollars in weapons in Iraq is also bound to sully the re branded image of Petraeus as being all knowing and being reproach.

With few American’s willing to trust that things are improving in Iraq, Allawi may just provide a pretext to keep the war going for another few years. During his appearance with Wolf Blitzer, Allawi spoke of his “six points call for a full partnership with the United States” and that his “objective is to develop a plan to save Iraq and to save American lives, as well as, of course, Iraqi lives, and to save the American mission in Iraq.

In other words, if the surge doesn’t wash with the public, Bush’s other option is to convince them that Allawi is the man for the job and that we owe it to the Iraqi people (and the troops of course), to give the plan a chance to work.

Yawn.

Self-hating right wing gays

The image of the right wing “family values” closet gay for an uncontrollable obsession with tasting the forbidden fruit, has almost become a stereotype, but these troubled souls continue to provide us with plenty of grist. Of course, the issue isn’t one about sexuality, but the hypocrisy of these individuals who not only claim moral superiority, but only campaign against the rights of gay people.

The latest episode involving Senator Larry Craig (a family values married) not only highlights this repression, but the inability of the right wing to come to terms with their own double standards. Gay activist Mike Rogers revealed that Craig has a fondness for having sex with anonymous men in public bathrooms.

As Rogers argued at the time, the story was relevant — just as the Vitter prostitute story was — in light of Craig’s frequent political exploitation of issues of sexual morality and his opposition to virtually every gay rights bill. Rogers’ story, as a factual matter, seemed relatively credible, both because of his history of accurate outings and because there is no discernible reason why, if he were intent on fabricating, he would single out someone as obscure as Larry Craig, who was not even up for re-election.

Nonetheless, it is hard to overstate the intense fury that this pre-election report triggered from the Right — not at Senator Craig for engaging in this behavior, but at Rogers for reporting it. A virtually unanimous chorus on the Right furiously insisted that nothing could be more irrelevant than whether the married family values Senator had sex with men in bathrooms (acts that are simultaneously criminal and adulterous). The same political movement that impeached Bill Clinton and which has made a living exploiting issues of private morality for political gain insisted that Rogers had reached a new and despicable low in politics even by reporting this.

As Glenn Greenwald points out, those that led the charges of sexual McCarthyism at the time included the usual suspects. They even went so far as to predict the backlash against the report would save the GOP during the last elections.

That was late 2006. Today is a different story. The same people who were wanting to lynch Rogers are now calling for Craig to resign.

Michelle Malkin yesterday called Craig a “weasel,” accused him of not caring about the “dignity of his office,” and demanded that he resign. Various other right-wing blogs — noting that a GOP governor will appoint his replacement — also are calling for Craig to resign.

So revealingly, Barnett’s blog colleague, Hugh Hewitt, demanded Craig’s immediate resignation while openly acknowledging that he does not believe Sen. Vitter should resign.

And the list goes on.

Mark Steyn echoes Hewitt’s demand that Craig resign and then proceeds to spew adolescent mockery comparing Craig to George Michael.

Bush’s gift to the Middle East

Behold the fruits of the Bush doctrine.

Zalmay Khalilzad told the daily Die Presse the Middle East was now so disordered that it had the potential to inflame the world as Europe did during the first half of the 20th century.

“The (Middle East) is going through a very difficult transformation phase. That has strengthened extremism and creates a breeding ground for terrorism,” he said in remarks translated by Reuters into English from the published German.

This must be what freedom looks like when it’s on the march.

Surely, none of this is the fault of Washington.  Who could perceive the policies of the Bush administration as anything other than purely altruistic?  For example:

THE White House’s plans to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist organisation are intended to give the Bush administration cover if it launches military strikes on the Islamic republic, according to a prominent former CIA officer.

Robert Baer, who was a high-ranking operative in the Middle East, has said that senior government officials had told him the administration was preparing for air strikes on the guards’ bases and probably also on Iran’s nuclear facilities within the next six months.

Any chaos that ensues as a result of these attacks, will be further proof that Islam is predisposed to self destruction.

Welcoming civil strife

Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory is a constantly evolving beast, but one thing remains constant; Palestinians are losing their land and dignity:

The occupied West Bank, 1999. A group of Israeli settlers complain that their mobile phone reception cuts out on a bend in a road from Jerusalem to their settlements.

The mobile phone company Orange agrees to put up an antenna on a hill overlooking the bend.

The hill happens to be owned by Palestinian farmers, but since mobile phone reception is a “security issue”, the mast construction can go ahead without the farmers’ permission.

Other companies agree to supply electricity and water to the construction site on the hill.

In May 2001 an Israeli security guard moves on to the site and connects his cabin to the water and electricity mains. Then his wife and children move in with him.

In March 2002 five more families join him to create the settler outpost of Migron. The Israeli ministry for construction and housing builds a nursery, while donations from abroad build a synagogue.

By mid-2006 Migron is a fully fledged illegal settlement comprising 60 trailers on a hilltop around the antenna, overlooking the Palestinian lands below.

This blow-by-blow account of just one example of the ongoing Israeli colonisation of Palestine appears in the opening pages of a fascinating new book by Eyal Weizman, the dissident Israeli architect.

The occupation increases in size every day and the Israeli state is simply indulging the settler movement.

Trusting fools

Remind me again why we should be supporting anything the US does in Iraq?

Iraq’s deadly insurgent groups have financed their war against U.S. troops in part with hundreds of thousands of dollars in U.S. rebuilding funds that they’ve extorted from Iraqi contractors in Anbar province. The payments, in return for the insurgents’ allowing supplies to move and construction work to begin, have taken place since the earliest projects in 2003, Iraqi contractors, politicians and interpreters involved with reconstruction efforts said.

A fresh round of rebuilding spurred by the U.S. military’s recent alliance with some Anbar tribes - 200 new projects are scheduled - provides another opportunity for militant groups such as al Qaeda in Iraq to siphon off more U.S. money, contractors and politicians warn.

“Now we’re back to the same old story in Anbar. The Americans are handing out contracts and jobs to terrorists, bandits and gangsters,” said Sheik Ali Hatem Ali Suleiman, the deputy leader of the Dulaim, the largest and most powerful tribe in Anbar. He was involved in several U.S. rebuilding contracts in the early days of the war, but is now a harsh critic of the U.S. presence.

When war pimps like William Shawcross continue to believe in the Bush administration - and this is a man who opposed the Vietnam war? - one knows that reality is setting in. Wake-up call, people: the US no longer controls events in Iraq. And for this we should be grateful.

The containment lie

Noam Chomsky, Khaleej Times, August 27:

In Washington a remarkable and ominous campaign is under way to “contain Iran,” which turns out to mean “containing Iranian influence,” in a confrontation that Washington Post correspondent Robin Wright calls “Cold War II.”

The sequel bears close scrutiny as it unfolds under the direction of former Kremlinologists Condoleezza Rice and Robert M Gates, according to Wright. Stalin had imposed an Iron Curtain to bar Western influence; Bush-Rice-Gates are imposing a Green Curtain to bar Iranian influence.

Washington’s concerns are understandable. In Iraq, Iranian support is welcomed by much of the majority Shia population. In Afghanistan, President Karzai describes Iran as “a helper and a solution.” In Palestine, Iranian-backed Hamas won a free election, eliciting savage punishment of the Palestinian population by the United States and Israel for voting “the wrong way.” In Lebanon, most Lebanese see Iranian-backed Hezbollah “as a legitimate force defending their country from Israel,” Wright reports. And the Bush administration, without irony, charges that Iran is “meddling” in Iraq, otherwise presumably free from foreign interference.

The ensuing debate is partly technical. Do the serial numbers on the Improvised Explosive Devices really trace back to Iran? If so, does the leadership of Iran know about the IEDs, or only the Iranian Revolutionary Guards? Settling the debate, the White House plans to brand the Revolutionary Guards as a “specially designated global terrorist” force, an unprecedented action against a national military branch, authorising Washington to undertake a wide range of punitive actions. 

The Great Iraq Swindle

A fascinating and disturbing account of how the corruption in Washington and the revolving door of lobbyists has led to the looting of the US Treasury.

How is it done? How do you screw the taxpayer for millions, get away with it and then ride off into the sunset with one middle finger extended, the other wrapped around a chilled martini? Ask Earnest O. Robbins — he knows all about being a successful contractor in Iraq.

You start off as a well-connected bureaucrat: in this case, as an Air Force civil engineer, a post from which Robbins was responsible for overseeing 70,000 servicemen and contractors, with an annual budget of $8 billion. You serve with distinction for thirty-four years, becoming such a military all-star that the Air Force frequently sends you to the Hill to testify before Congress — until one day in the summer of 2003, when you retire to take a job as an executive for Parsons, a private construction company looking to do work in Iraq.

Now you can finally move out of your dull government housing on Bolling Air Force Base and get your wife that dream home you’ve been promising her all these years. The place on Park Street in Dunn Loring, Virginia, looks pretty good — four bedrooms, fireplace, garage, 2,900 square feet, a nice starter home in a high-end neighborhood full of spooks, think-tankers and ex-apparatchiks moved on to the nest-egg phase of their faceless careers. On October 20th, 2003, you close the deal for $775,000 and start living that private-sector good life.

Read the whole article.




This is a non-profit site dedicated to providing timely and challenging material. Any financial contributions would be greatly appreciated, however, to sustain hosting costs and the life of a freelance journalist.