<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let the leaked documents flow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2008/03/01/let-the-leaked-documents-flow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2008/03/01/let-the-leaked-documents-flow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Banking for the rich boys &#124; Antony Loewenstein</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2008/03/01/let-the-leaked-documents-flow/#comment-394331</link>
		<dc:creator>Banking for the rich boys &#124; Antony Loewenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2008/03/01/let-the-leaked-documents-flow/#comment-394331</guid>
		<description>[...] the recent legal dramas over the Wikileaks website, the team is back with another top [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the recent legal dramas over the Wikileaks website, the team is back with another top [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The right to say whatever &#124; Antony Loewenstein</title>
		<link>http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2008/03/01/let-the-leaked-documents-flow/#comment-391497</link>
		<dc:creator>The right to say whatever &#124; Antony Loewenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2008/03/01/let-the-leaked-documents-flow/#comment-391497</guid>
		<description>[...] investigative website Wikileaks was deemed too controversial by a Californian judge and made temporarily unavailable (though not any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] investigative website Wikileaks was deemed too controversial by a Californian judge and made temporarily unavailable (though not any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
