I’ve moved to a new website. This site will remain alive, but will not be updated. New comments will no longer be accepted.
My new blog can be found here.
It was time to upgrade, modernise and move on.
Please join me.
Author Archive for Antony Loewenstein Blogspot Archives
I’ve moved to a new website. This site will remain alive, but will not be updated. New comments will no longer be accepted.
The Guardian’s Israel correspondent, Chris McGreal, has produced some of the best reporting from the region. His latest reports (part one and part two) discuss the long-standing relationship between South Africa and the Jewish state and the similarities between apartheid South Africa and present day Israel. This series is some of the finest journalism I’ve read in months.
Meanwhile, as US Zionists are concerned about the Hamas win - and seem to believe that the US should undermine democratic elections if the desired party won’t win - and complain about an awarded film from Palestine, facts on the ground continue to prove the devastation of the occupation. Amira Hass reports:
“While the international community busied itself with the disengagement from the Gaza Strip last summer, Israel completed another cut-off process, which went unnoticed: in 2005, Israel completed a process of cutting off the eastern sector of the West Bank, including the Jordan Rift Valley, from the remainder of the West Bank.
“Some 2,000,000 Palestinians, residents of the West Bank, are prohibited from entering the area, which constitutes around one-third of the West Bank, and includes the Jordan Rift, the area of the Dead Sea shoreline and the eastern slopes of the West Bank mountains.”
Last, but not least, yet more confirmation that the Israeli security services always knew that the 2000 Intifada was not a premeditated move by Arafat.
When it comes to Israel, it’s usually best to avoid official versions of every event. Lying has become a full-time business.
- Craig Murray - the UK’s former ambassador to Uzbekistan and now critic of the “war on terror - is facing hurdles in publishing his forthcoming book. The letter from the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office is a shameless attempt at censorship and intimidation.
- Dick Cheney accidentally misses his intended target - himself.
- Uri Avnery explains the power of Israel’s Kadima party.
- While an Australian Federal MP doesn’t seem to know the difference between Papua New Guinea and West Papua and the Australia’s Greg Sheridan believes the Indonesian military doesn’t engage in war crimes in West Papua, it is worth reading the 2003 report by Yale University that reveals the extent of the devastation by the Indonesian military in the Indonesian province:
“Although no single act or set of acts can be said to have constituted genocide, per se, and although the required intent cannot be as readily inferred as it was in the cases of the Holocaust or the Rwandan genocide, there can be little doubt that the Indonesian government has engaged in a systematic pattern of acts that has resulted in harm to-and indeed the destruction of-a substantial part of the indigenous population of West Papua.”
UPDATE: A leading Chinese blogger explains the ways in which Microsoft is censoring material in China.
John Pike, a military analyst at GlobalSecurity.Org, argues that the Bush administration should rename its ideological struggle, The Forever War.
“‘We’re in the 17th year of The Long War,’ he says, arguing the U.S. has been in perpetual combat since it intervened in Panama to remove Manuel Noriega from power in 1989.
“‘Since then, we have been blowing somebody up, or getting ready to blow somebody up or coming back from blowing somebody up. It is so normal, people don’t even notice any more.
“It’s not about bin Laden any more. People aren’t scared of him any more.
“My fear is that it is really the inauguration of the second Republic here because if you look closely at where this president is claiming his legal powers, it completely redefines the powers of the American government.”
David Frost, The Observer, February 12:
“But I think when viewers watch al-Jazeera International, they will be closer to watching CNN.”
While Israel’s supposed leftist Labor Party prove their dedication to the extreme Zionist cause, the UN releases a report on the ongoing trauma of the occupation:
“Israel’s separation wall and its network of checkpoints and roadblocks across the occupied West Bank have led to a ‘de-development’ of the Palestinian economy, a report by the Office of the United Nations Special Coordinator (UNSCO) said on Thursday, February 9.
“Francine Pickup, author of the report, said poverty and unemployment in the West Bank were expected to increase because of denying Palestinian workers access into Israeli markets.”
As the Israeli state continues to demolish Palestinian homes in the name of upholding the law, the director of the Institute of Modern Media at Al-Quds University in Ramallah writes about the fall-out of the Hamas win:
“Palestinians are watching the post-election discussions rather calmly. For the time being, liberal Palestinians are dealing with the victory of the conservative Hamas with little more than jokes. Behind this jokes is an expectation, or hope, that Hamas politicians will be shaped by a stark reality they did not have to face in the past. This, along with Hamas’s fear of being voted out in the next elections, is reassuring Palestinians that whatever happens will be an improvement.
“As many people are saying, it can’t get much worse.”
China’s insatiable appetite for natural resources is taking the growing superpower to predictable places in Africa. For example, Sudan and China are increasingly close on military issues. Such behaviour is familiar to Western governments, fond of arming and supporting dictatorships throughout the continent. Black Looks blog, a Nigerian living in Spain, explains:
“I see no difference between the actions of the Chinese government and those of other Western governments and their multinationals except to say the Chinese seem to be far more open about the way they operate than Western governments and corporations.”
John Bunzl, Haaretz, February 10:
“It was the late Edward Said who thought differently. He argued convincingly that recognizing the Holocaust for what it was (a genocide of the Jewish people) would increase the moral validity and legitimacy to demand recognition of the (very different) Palestinian Nakba (catastrophe of 1948), and that such recognition would make it easier to understand some features of Israeli society that genuinely reflect consequences of trauma and cannot be reduced to effects of political instrumentalization.
Iranian Jews deserve support for their courageous stand:
“Iran’s Jews have sharply criticized President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for denying the Holocaust, saying his remarks have sparked fears in their ancient but dwindling community.
“Haroun Yashayaei, the head of Iran’s Jewish community, sent a letter of complaint to Ahmadinejad two weeks ago.
“‘How is it possible to ignore all of the undeniable evidence existing for the exile and massacre of the Jews in Europe during World War Two?’ said a copy of Yashayaei’s letter faxed to Reuters on Sunday.
“‘Challenging one of the most obvious and saddening events of 20th-century humanity has created astonishment among the people of the world and spread fear and anxiety among the small Jewish community of Iran,’ the letter added.
“A Jewish community leader said he preferred not to comment on whether Ahmadinejad had sent a reply to the letter, penned on behalf on the entire Jewish community.
“Jews occupy an awkward position in Israel’s arch-foe Iran, often speaking out against Israeli treatment of Palestinians.”
While reports suggest that the US is planning military strikes against Tehran, the international community should be rallying around individuals or groups expressing dissent from the official government line, such as Iranian Jews.
Saree Makdisi, Counterpunch, February 10:
“…There can be no doubt that the Hamas charter is not only xenophobic, sectarian, and racist, but also ill-conceived, inaccurate, retrograde, and intellectually vacuous. Nevertheless, the obsessive attention being paid to this document in the US in recent weeks forces one to ask not merely what purposes such an obsession serves, but also what equally (or even more) important issues it elides or covers up.
“First, one has to marvel at the interest being paid to the racism of the Hamas charter, given the extraordinary lack of interest here in Israel’s own racism, which is executed not merely on paper and in theory but actually, practically, materially.
“Israel’s Basic Laws, for example, discriminate between Jews and non-Jews in ways that many of those Americans who object most loudly to the mixture of religion and politics strangely don’t seem to find objectionable. And Israel’s unique existence as a country that expressly claims to be not the state of its actual citizens but rather of a globally dispersed people manifestly privileges the (non-Israeli) Jews of New York and Chicago over Israel’s actually existing non-Jewish citizens. Although they amount to some twenty percent of the state’s population, the latter are literally written into second class status by virtue of their non-Jewishness in what loudly proclaims itself to be the Jewish state.”
Conservative US commentator Andrew Sullivan publishes some “liberal” thoughts on the Danish cartoon controversy. Take this example:
“I’m honestly starting to suspect that, before this is over, European nations are going to have exactly four choices in dealing with their entire Moslem populations - for elementary safety’s sake”:
(1) “Capitulate totally to them and become a Moslem continent.”
(2) “Intern all of them.”
(3) “Deport all of them.”
(4) “Throw all of them into the sea.”
Such hysterical, racist nonsense may occupy the minds of supposed internationalists, but calmer heads must, and will, prevail.
Italian footballer Paolo Di Canio - “a fascist but not a racist” - has been given some appropriate punishment:
“Paolo Di Canio, the Lazio forward who has become the darling of the neo-fascist right with his repeated straight-arm salutes, has been summoned by the mayor of Rome to listen to fellow Italians who survived the Nazi death camps.
“The move is part of an initiative by the mayor that has already brought AS Roma players and officials face to face with Holocaust survivors in the city hall. For almost two hours on Thursday, Francesco Totti and the other members of the Serie A side listened in silence as former concentration-camp inmates appealed to them to stop playing as soon as they saw Nazi symbols in the crowd.”
Di Canio may be ignorant but Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi caused outrage in 2003 by suggesting Mussolini “never killed anyone” and merely “sent people on holiday to confine them.”
Leonard Fein, The Forward, February 10:
“Here’s a puzzle, a small piece of a much larger set of nagging issues that bubbles just beneath the surface of our ordinary lives: On December 23, 2005, Lawrence Kaplan, a senior editor of The New Republic, asserted in The Wall Street Journal that ‘Israeli officials were lukewarm about the war [in Iraq] from the outset, being far more concerned with the threat from Iran.’
“Yet now we have a book by James Risen, national security correspondent for The New York Times, titled ‘State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration,’ that argues the exact opposite.
“In a section on the prewar jockeying in Washington, Risen describes the role of Paul Wolfowitz, then undersecretary of defense. Wolfowitz, he writes, found the CIA ‘insufficiently hawkish,’ believed it ‘an arrogant, rogue institution…unwilling to support administration policymakers.’ Specifically, Wolfowitz insisted on examining ‘the possibility that Saddam Hussein was behind the [September 11] attacks on the United States,’ a possibility that the CIA discounted.
“Now comes the kicker: ‘Israeli intelligence played a hidden role in convincing Wolfowitz that he couldn’t trust the CIA… Israeli intelligence officials frequently travelled to Washington to brief top American officials, but CIA analysts were often sceptical of Israeli intelligence reports, knowing that Mossad had very strong - even transparent - biases about the Arab world.’ Wolfowitz, who ‘had begun meeting personally with top Israeli intelligence officials,’ preferred the Mossad’s analysis to the CIA’s.
“Now it cannot be that Israeli officials were at one and the same time ‘lukewarm about the war’ yet busy shuttling back and forth to encourage Wolfowitz’s evident eagerness for that same war. From all that we know regarding Wolfowitz and his ideological associates - Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and others - the Risen version seems to me the more plausible.”
The full truth of the Iraq war is yet to emerge, though Israel’s key involvement is a given. Now that the Jewish state’s head of domestic security says he misses Saddam, one can be assured that the gross failure of the Iraq war is starting to bite.
After a group of British academics decided to boycott Israel in 2005 (though later overturned), the inevitable second stage is upon us:
“A group including some of Britain’s most prominent architects is considering calling for an economic boycott of Israel’s construction industry in protest at the building of Israeli settlements and the separation barrier in the Occupied Territories.
“The group said that architects, planners and engineers working on Israeli projects in the occupied territories were ‘complicit in social, political and economic oppression’, and ‘in violation of their professional code of ethics’.
“It said that: ‘Planning, architecture and other construction disciplines are being used to promote an apartheid system of environmental control.’”
While the chairman of the Israel Architects’ Association may claim that the boycott is inappropriate because “the Government of Israel, which evacuated the Gaza Strip, is currently showing goodwill and trying to reach an agreement”, the co-ordinator of the proposed boycott argues that, “since nothing seems to deter Israel, and western governments remain silent, civil society has to pressure Israel and those creating the physical reality of these injustices that are the cause of such instability in the Middle East.”
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Yet more evidence that Guantanamo Bay is the “gulag of our times“:
“More than half of the terror suspects being held at Guantanamo Bay have not been accused of committing hostile acts against the United States or its allies, two of the detainees’ lawyers said in a report released Tuesday.
“Compiled from declassified Defense Department evaluations of the more than 500 detainees at the Cuba facility, the report says just 8 percent are listed as fighters for a terrorist group, while 30 percent are considered members of a terrorist group and the remaining 60 percent were just ‘associated with’ terrorists.
“The evaluations were completed as part of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals conducted during 2004 to determine if the prisoners were being correctly held as enemy combatants. So far just 10 of the detainees have been formally charged with crimes and are headed for military tribunals.
“According to the report, 55 percent of the detainees are informally accused of committing a hostile act. But the descriptions of their actions ranged from a high-ranking Taliban member who tortured and killed Afghan natives to people who possessed rifles, used a guest house or wore olive drab clothing.”
Remind me to watch people in “olive drab clothing.” One wonders where Australian captive David Hicks fits into the picture. His father, Terry, yesterday accused the US of holding his son as the “token white fella.”
In further Guantanamo revelations, a recent article in the National Journal provides “powerful evidence confirming what many of us have suspected for years”:
- A high percentage, perhaps the majority, of the 500-odd men now held at Guantanamo were not captured on any battlefield, let alone on ‘the battlefield in Afghanistan’ (as Bush asserted) while ‘trying to kill American forces’ (as McClellan claimed).
- Fewer than 20% of the Guantanamo detainees, the best available evidence suggests, have ever been al-Qaeda members.
- Many scores, and perhaps hundreds, of the detainees were not even Taliban foot soldiers, let alone al-Qaeda terrorists. They were innocent, wrongly seized noncombatants with no intention of joining the al-Qaeda campaign to murder Americans.
- The majority were not captured by U.S. forces but rather handed over by reward-seeking Pakistanis and Afghan warlords and by villagers of highly doubtful reliability. These locals had strong incentives to tar as terrorists any and all Arabs they could get their hands on as the Arabs fled war-torn Afghanistan in late 2001 and 2002 - including noncombatant teachers and humanitarian workers.
- And the Bush administration has apparently made very little effort to corroborate the plausible claims of innocence detailed by many of the men who were handed over.
The military trials are a sham, based largely on guilt-by-association claims. Writer Stuart Taylor explains:
“The administration’s unspoken logic appears to be: Better to ruin the lives of 10 innocent men than to let one who might be a terrorist go free. This logic would be understandable if the end of protecting American lives justified any and all means, including the wrecking of many more innocent non-American lives…”
Such realities perfectly explain the cynicism towards the US in certain parts of the world. Some of us prefer to simply regard the US as a rogue state.
- Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez tells Tony Blair to “go right to hell” and accuses him of being a “pawn of imperialism.”
- The Danish editor of “those” cartoons interviewed neo-con and Islamophobe Daniel Pipes in 2004.
- John Howard thinks the Greens are offensive. This is clearly much more problematic than sending a country to war on a lie. On a related topic, the Murdoch broadsheet says the local arts community is arrogant and out of touch. That rather reminds me of someone else…
- New Orleans is rebuilding.
The head of Israel’s domestic security agency, Yuval Diskin, proves Israel’s belief in Middle Eastern democracy:
“When you dismantle a system in which there is a despot who controls his people by force, you have chaos. I’m not sure we won’t miss Saddam.”
While Nato dismisses the possibility of Israel entering the club as a “security umbrella” to protect the Jewish state from Iran and the World Jewish Congress launches a campaign against the Islamic state, John Pilger explains that the Western powers are preparing for a war of aggression:
“Like the invasion of Iraq, an attack on Iran has a secret agenda that has nothing to do with the Tehran regime’s imaginary weapons of mass destruction. That Washington has managed to coerce enough members of the International Atomic Energy Agency into participating in a diplomatic charade is no more than reminiscent of the way it intimidated and bribed the “international community” into attacking Iraq in 1991.
“Iran offers no ‘nuclear threat’. There is not the slightest evidence that it has the centrifuges necessary to enrich uranium to weapons-grade material. The head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, has repeatedly said his inspectors have found nothing to support American and Israeli claims. Iran has done nothing illegal; it has demonstrated no territorial ambitions nor has it engaged in the occupation of a foreign country - unlike the United States, Britain and Israel. It has complied with its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to allow inspectors to ‘go anywhere and see anything’ - unlike the US and Israel. The latter has refused to recognise the NPT, and has between 200 and 500 thermonuclear weapons targeted at Iran and other Middle Eastern states.”
Not unlike Britain, Washington is likely to ask Australia for troops and assistance. It is unlikely John Howard would deny the request and it is therefore vital to begin a campaign to avert a potentially catastrophic conflict.
