Bush and Blair just can’t seem to get a break. While constantly reminding us that withdrawing from Iraq would guarantee more planes crashing into buildings, a new study confirms what we already know. Bush and his favourite poodles, Blair and Howard, are making us less safe.
The US-led and British-backed war on terror is only fuelling more violence by focusing on military solutions rather than on root causes, a think tank warned Wednesday.
“The ‘war on terror’ is failing and actually increasing the likelihood of more terrorist attacks,” the Oxford Research Group said in its study, titled “Beyond Terror: The Truth About The Real Threats To Our World.”
It said Britain and the United States have used military might to try to “keep the lid on” problems rather than trying to uproot the causes of terrorism.
It said such an approach, particularly the 2003 invasion of Iraq, had actually heightened the risk of further terrorist atrocities on the scale of September 11, 2001.
“Treating Iraq as part of the war on terror only spawned new terror in the region and created a combat training zone for jihadists,” the report’s authors argued.
It pointed out that the Islamist Taliban movement is now resurgent, six years after it was overthrown in 2001 by the US-led invasion in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
“Sustainable approaches” to fighting terrorism would involve the withdrawal of US-led forces from Iraq and their replacement with a United Nations stabilisation force, it said.
It also recommended the provision of sustained aid for rebuilding and developing Iraq and Afghanistan as well as closing the US prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where most suspects are held without charge or trial.
And it called for a “genuine commitment to a viable two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.”
The study warned that military intervention in Iran over its nuclear ambitions would be “disastrous,” calling instead for a firm and public commitment to a diplomatic solution.
Iran insists the programme is peaceful, despite claims from Washington that it masks a drive for nuclear weapons.
The study also said the British government’s plans to upgrade the submarine-based Trident nuclear deterrent could produce international instability.
“Nuclear weapon modernisation is likely to serve as a substantial encouragement to nuclear proliferation as countries with perceptions of vulnerability deem it necessary to develop their own deterrent capabilities,” it said.
While on the subject of instability, it looks like Bush’s and Blair’s antics are on their way to undoing what took decades to achieve.
Russia is preparing its own military response to the US’s controversial plans to build a new missile defence system in eastern Europe, according to Kremlin officials, in a move likely to increase fears of a cold war-style arms race.
Just what the world needed. Another arms race.