Enough is enough
“The Pentagon has no accurate knowledge of the cost of military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan or the fight against terrorism, limiting Congress’s ability to oversee spending, the Government Accountability Office concluded in a report released yesterday.”
Let me get this straight. The report found “inadvertent double accounting” by the Navy and Marine Corps and inaccuracies totalling billions of dollars. “Neither DOD nor Congress can reliably know how much the war is costing and details of how appropriated funds are being spent,” the report to Congress stated.
Columbia Journalism Review’s Gal Beckerman wonders why such a story is buried and why such figures aren’t causing newspaper editors to investigate much further:
“Perhaps newspaper editors have become insensitive to the idea of a few billion dollars misplaced or, worse, just missing. But from the looks of things down south, with New Orleans in ruins and Hurricane Rita barrelling toward land with 165 mph winds, the federal government is going to need every cent it can find.”
Meanwhile, back in fantasy land, the Sydney Morning Herald today leads with this: “Biggest ever surplus: now for tax cuts.” The paper ends the article like so:
LET’S GO SHOPPING
What to do with the surplus:
- Business: cut the top tax rate and capital gains tax.
- Labor: tax relief for middle-income earners.
- Motorists: cheaper petrol.
- Access Economics: save it for when we need it.
In a different part of the paper, there is an extensive examination of global environmental degradation.
Clearly the Sydney Morning Herald sees no contradiction in both these stories. Tax relief may win votes, but environmental destruction could eventually kill any children born through the baby bonus. It’s time for responsible journalists and editors to wake up and join the dots.
Voice of an Israeli soldier
“We were expressly told that we were just waiting for someone to climb on an APC. We were ordered to shoot to kill. We quickly understood that we weren’t expected to deal with armed people, as no armed Palestinian would roam the streets with so many APCs around. They (our authorities) were looking for children or plain people daring to climb on an APC or on any other armoured vehicle. We understood that from the talks with our officers.
“After a day or two, a 12-year old kid climbed on one of the APCs. There were lots of guesses about his age. First they said he was 8, later, that he was 12. I don’t know. In any case he climbed on an APC and one of our sharpshooters killed him. I already mentioned, we were looking for kids. The neighbouring company also had an incident with a kid or teenager, climbing an APC, who was also killed. Some of us said that this whole operation was unnecessary as its purpose was to kill kids, while others said that it was very good.”
1st Sergeant, Paratroops, Jenin, February-May 2003
Breaking the Silence
Colonial mentality
Back to Ali:
“The occupation has also created a geopolitical mess. Recent events in Basra are linked to a western fear of Iranian domination. Having encouraged Moqtada al-Sadr’s militias to resist the slavishly pro-Iranian faction, why are the British surprised when they demand real independence?
“The Iranian mullahs, meanwhile, are chuckling – literally. Some months ago, when the Iranian vice-president visited the United Arab Emirates for a regional summit, he was asked by the sheikhs whether he feared a US intervention in Iran. The Iranian leader roared with laughter: “Without us, the US could never have occupied Afghanistan or Iraq. They know that and we know that invading Iran would mean they would be driven out of those two countries.”"
Ali concludes by reminding us that England can no longer call itself a representative democracy:
“He [Tony Blair] was re-elected with only 35 % of the popular vote and barely a fifth of the overall electorate – the lowest percentage secured by any governing party in recent European history. Britain is undergoing a crisis of representation: a majority of the population opposed the war in Iraq; a majority favours withdrawing British troops; 66% believe that the attacks on London were a direct result of Blair’s decision to send troops to Iraq.”
Why hate America?
Sydneysiders, looking for something to do on the evening of Thursday, September 29?
Come down to The Salon:
The Debate – featuring:
NEVILLE MEANEY (Assoc. Professor – 20th Century American History, University of Sydney)
JAMES MORROW (Editor, Investigate & New Yorker)
ANTONY LOEWENSTEIN (Freelance Journalist and Author)
Knot Gallery, Level 1, 342 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills.
7:30-11:30pm (debate starts at 9:00pm; film screening at 8:30pm)
$8 entry
Come on down and join the debate.
Agents provocateurs?
Journalist William Bowles investigates and finds it hard to get past the British and BBC spin:
“When viewed in the context of all the stories that have been circulating about the mythical ‘al-Zarqawi’ and the alleged role of al-Qaeda, the events in Basra are the first real evidence that we have of the role of occupation forces in destabilising Iraq through the use of agents provocateurs masquerading as ‘insurgents’.”
As for American, British and Australian ambitions in Iraq, this gives us a clue:
“A Foreign Office source said the goal of the US Administration to turn Iraq into a beacon of democracy in the Middle East had long ago been shelved. “We will settle for leaving behind an Iraqi democracy that is creaking along,” the source said.”
For some Australian armchair warmongers, however, blind propaganda for the Iraq cause will always smell sweet, no matter the facts.
Peace in our time
Amira Hass, Haaretz, September 22
And how do pro-Israel supporters feel about this?
“Sixty-one women have given birth at Israeli checkpoints since 2000 due to delays in getting through the checkpoints, and 36 of their babies died as a result, the United Nations said on Thursday.”
Phil Donahue vs Bill O’Reilly
O’REILLY: “We’re in a war on terror. Our cause is noble.”
Fisk barred
It’s too early to tell whether this was merely a bureaucratic bungle or something more sinister.
The inhumane occupation
The “Wild West” of Israel’s occupation is detailed in a compelling report published in mass circulation paper, Yediot Ahronot.
The occupation has corrupted untold numbers of Israeli men and women and dehumanised generations of Palestinians.
Facing reality
Meddling
The Australian reports this “exclusive” today. Note that Jeffrey doesn’t question the legitimacy of the war nor the real reasons behind it. “We” must win, whatever the cost. Let’s not forget that this is a man who once said: “I believe passionately that Vietnam was a just cause in the circumstances of the time.”
Jeffrey represents a military establishment that thrives on conflict. Without it, their role seems somehow irrelevant. John Howard has defended Jeffrey. And he offers this telling comment: “It’s tough [in Iraq] but it’s all the more reason therefore that we stay the distance because if we give up and the place lapses into total chaos, that will put enormous pressure on neighbouring countries and it will be a very bad outcome for the west if that were to occur.”
Shame about those tens of thousands of Iraqis killed, Prime Minister.