Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Some chickens, some roosting

The tide may be turning within the US. The current Iraq policy is a shambles and the country is largely controlled by insurgents. George W. Bush is being challenged like never before and increasing number of senators want to discuss an exit strategy.

Prime Minister John Howard should be similarly challenged.

Next step is an international court of justice for the likes of Bush, Blair and Howard. They deserve little better than prison scraps.

  • Edward Mariyani-Squi

    "The current Iraq policy is a shambles and the country is largely controlled by insurgents."About a month or so ago on ABC's Radio National an Iraqi political analyst was being interviewed (you get so much more insight from these guys compared to some US private think-tank blow-in). His analysis was hideously complex. Paraphrasing and simplifying, one of the thousand points he made was there were three national powers operating in Iraq. The US and the UK were two of them. The third was Iran, operating at the "grass roots" level. He claimed that for Iran, destabilisation – a kind of "divide and conquer" strategy – is the name of the game.

  • Pete's Blog

    Oh come on ALLittle Johnny got it wrong sending Australia into the Iraq war but suggesting that he go before an international court, presumably for war crimess, is a tad far fetched.I understand that Australian forces have been paying considerable amounts (by Iraqi standards) of compensation money for the handful of Iraqi's injured by mistake by the Australian army.I can't recall any lethal firefights Australians have been involved in.As Howards main "crime" is backing Bush then putting Howard on trial will only accelerate the day when some worse Liberal (Abbott?) or bomber Beazley takes the PM posi and continues Australia's involvement.

  • Wombat

    "international court" may be a extreme, but he did deliberately lie the country into participating in the war, against overwhelming opposition. That has to be reason enough for removing him from office.

  • boredinHK

    AL, Would you recommend we add a few mullahs to the list for prosecution at the 'international' court? As Edward M-S wrote "The US and the UK were two of them. The third was Iran, operating at the "grass roots" level. He claimed that for Iran, destabilisation – a kind of "divide and conquer" strategy – is the name of the game "Supplying weapons to those who kill Iraqis in Iraq is a crime regardless of the source isn't it ?

  • Antony Loewenstein

    Yes, Howard is far from alone, but until Western leaders, involved in illegal, unprovoked wars, are brought before international justice, the international system will not function properly.And we are getting closer to that day.

  • Wombat

    I really do hope you're right AL. It seems the leaders in the US and the UK are feeling the heat, but the tide seems far from tuurning Australia.

  • georgekotzabasis

    After the aphrodisiac of "withindrawal" that these senators entered with their quintogenerian virility Bush's declaration of war in full support, now that the going is tough, as wet wimps are discussing their withdrawal.Mistakes galore, the fact is that Iraq now, is the frontline of global terror. Anyone who believes that the West has no option but to fight this menace, must realise, that a withdrawal from Iraq now, without the defeat of the insurgents, would be the greatest strategic mistake, surpassing by a great order of magnitude, all the errors the Americans made post April 2003, at the defeat of Saddam.An exit strategy would only embolden global terror, and increase its danger against the West.

  • georgekotzabasis

    Go to my Blog on Google for morehttp://congeorgekotzabasis.blogspot.kgtcvcom

  • theswanker

    So long as the pricks that run Zimbabwe, Burma, North Korea, China, Turkmenistan (the list goes on) are also indicted.

  • Davo

    Well I'm sure if we actually had an opposition in Australia (THe labour party don't count) then [perhaps a challenge could be mad.