Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Fair go for all

Reuters reports an important development in Israel’s understanding of the conflict:

“Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said on Monday acceptance within the international community of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state would erode with time as conflict with the Palestinians dragged on.

“Unless progress was made towards establishing a Palestinian state as mandated by a U.S.-backed peace road map, Livni said in a speech, pressure could grow to turn Israel into a bi-national state in which Israelis and Palestinians would share power.

“With a higher Palestinian birth rate, that could mean the end of a Jewish majority in what is now Israel, she said, giving voice to an argument interim Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has raised for trading occupied land for peace.

“‘I say that time works to our disadvantage, not only from the standpoint of demographic numbers…but also from the standpoint of the legitimacy of a state for the Jewish people in the eyes of the international community,'” Livni told a policymakers’ forum near Tel Aviv.”

I’ve long believed that a bi-national state is the ideal way to resolve the conflict, but it must be reached in stages. Therefore, a two-state solution is the best way forward for the foreseeable future. A full and frank appreciation of suffering on both sides, reparations for Palestinian losses in 1948 onwards, the eradication of the occupation, a shared Jerusalem and joint environmental policy will, at some point in the future, be the only solution.

Livni – Jews Sans Frontieres rightly asks: “Where else on the world would a politician so obsessed with ‘demographics’ be described as ‘centrist’ and by Reuters too? – has merely articulated the fear within many Jews. Can you imagine the outcry if George Bush publicly stated he wanted a white majority to remain in the US? When Israel talks about “demographics”, however, it’s labelled “pragmatism.”

  • Wombat

    Elementary moral principles for me, means what Rh was alluding to. That you must take reponsibilty for what happens to you as well as what you do. Sometimes this means confronting what we would rather not.Words like retavism and equivalence have been used to create some blurred demarcation line between freedom fighters and terrosists.It's a fraud. Vilence is violence and becasue we do it without meanign to kill innocents does not absolve us of reposnsibility just becaseu we consider our intentiones pure.

  • Clumsy Birds

    Addamo_01,Why aren’t you therefore enlisted with the armed forces oh brave one?Poor logic. Did you support Timor? Why weren’t you with the ADF? When the UN finally gets off its swollen lazy arse, will you be in the army they send to stop genocide in the Sudan? The ADF is made up of voluntary forces- and even though Antony wants that to change- that’s the way it’s going to stay for the foreseeable future. Your doing what the American left does, claiming you love the troops (don’t get in a frenzy yet, no doubt you do), and you want to see ‘our young boys’ come home. There not little boys, they’re men and women doing a great job that they are trained for (and NOT war criminals who ‘deserve’ to be defeated, Antony). If any non-military ‘chicken-hawks’ went over to Iraq to help, they’d just getting in the way.Here Addamo_01, you might be interested in this guys blog:,The only 'holocaust' in the Middle East at the moment is the one Israel is perpetrating against the Palestinians.Is it a magical reverse Holocaust, the more Palestinians the evil Israelis kill, rape, and steal from, the quicker their numbers grow? Amazing stuff… I’m going to look in my wardrobe now, to see if I can find my way to Narnia.Grow up, mate.

  • smiths

    are the people in iraq who attack american troops terrorists, insurgents, freedom fighters or maybe soldiers?

  • smiths

    and remember guys, even though holocaust is a very old word, originally referring to destruction by fire it now belongs to the jews and the israeli state,any use of it by another group or in a different context will not be tolerated

  • Wombat

    Stewie,"Poor logic. Did you support Timor? Why weren’t you with the ADF?"I agree. That was my point entirely. David was the one who raised this reasining by suggesting that Ant should get his arse over to Iraq becase he dared to imply that the news comming out of Iraq was limited.As for your link, yes I am aware of similar blogs. It's a pitty the US military is shutting down most blogs and onyl allowing authorised blogs. Perhaps they donlt want toomuch good news getting out in one go, or could it be because this report has come validity?;_ylt=Aouh5axe8UtTOItm1sa19aus0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ–

  • violet

    smiths are the people in iraq who attack american troops terrorists, insurgents, freedom fighters or maybe soldiers?You do not appear to understand the difference between armed civilians and soldiers. Are any of you aware that there is a difference? That terrorists are not recognised as soldiers? I assume you know that there are rules on a battlefield? And that there are Geneva Conventions defining legitimate warfare?stevOf course we feel the need to defend ourselves Violet – you are accusing people who would generally consider themselves compassionateSo, now you know how the Jews feel — being continually accused of cruelty, being attacked by bombers and armed civilians and being told to get out of the country created for them in 1948. It's no wonder many are defensive. It's no wonder they feel "a little " paranoid. I wonder how you'd feel.

  • Stev

    So you attack people the way you think the Jews shouldn't be attacked – and that helps your cause how exactly? Doesn't it just make you as bad as the people that you're claiming are in the wrong?Also, you wonder how I'd feel, but didn't you just say I now know how they feel? Your opening and closing lines seem to be in direct contradiction.

  • Stev

    Just on that first point too – I strongly believe that in the history of the humanity treating someone the way you've been treated so they know how bad it is has never yielded positive results. Mistreatment is usual some kind of violence, be it physical or psychological. It's cliche, but it's true – violence really does beget more violence. It may just be my Christian upbringing, but I truly believe it is better (both from a moral viewpoint, and more successful) to treat someone as you would like to be treated.

  • smiths

    violet,ever heard of david and goliath?, of course you have,america attacked iraq without provocation or just cause which makes it an aggressor,it has the largest military capacity in history which makes it goliath,the iraqi people engage in assymetric warfare because it is the only choice they have,like david did, which makes them soldiers,if nazi germany(the universal villain) had invaded england the 'people' would have formed cells of 'resistance' and stepped out of alleys and shot nazi soldiers in the back of the head and dissappeared like the french did,this method if successful in ending the occupation would have made the 'people' freedom fighters and heroes of the oppressed nation state.since you detest relativism, you ought to stick to concrete definitions and apply them to all without regard to race or nationality, like this one from the british government"Terrorism is the use, or threat, of action which is violent, damaging or disrupting, and is intended to influence the government or intimidate the public and is for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, or ideological cause."quite clearly it applies to the actions of both the israeli state and the palestinian non-state,both guilty of terrorism,or would like to shift the defintion in a more relative kind of way?

  • violet

    smithsYou have a typical Leftist ideological interpretation of warfare. Because humans have almost always engaged in physical combat against each other we have the Geneva Conventions and we have rules of warfare. We have rules for the battlefield that are designed and agreed upon for proper behaviour whilst in battle. I was asking you if you understood this concept?

  • neoleftychick

    violetYou are wasting your time. My experience with anti-semites like smiths is that they are totally ignorant of international law, despite raving on about it so much.

  • Wombat

    Violet,Have you been in a cave somewhere the last 3 years or did oyu miss the bit about Gonzales regarding he Geneva conventions as quaint? In other words, superfluosu, unecessary and outdated.What message do you think the soldiers are getting?Instead, geniuses like Cheney and the other neocon nitwits are trying to take comfort in the fact that their policies are a costly failure.

  • Ibrahamav

    They are getting the message that there is too much addamo in the world. And you are supplying most of it.The soldiers in the field don't give a shit about what Gonzales wrote.

  • Wombat

    …and even less about the Geneva conventions and human rights apprently.

  • Ibrahamav

    Again, knowledge based on guesses and addamo.