Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Release him now

Is blogging journalism? This question – which in some ways is fairly academic, as many bloggers are more inquisitive than mainstream journalists – is central to an under-reported story in California:

The imprisonment of jailed videographer Joshua Wolf for refusing to hand over uncut tape of a violent protest has quietly entered its third month, but even some of the groups that have come to his legal aid question whether the blogger is really a journalist.

On Tuesday, when his lawyers will ask a federal judge to release him, the 24-year-old Wolf will have served 93 days in jail, surpassing the 85 days served last year by New York Times reporter Judith Miller. The record term for a journalist held in contempt was for Vanessa Leggett, a Houston-based freelancer who served 168 days in 2001 and 2002 for declining to reveal unpublished material about a murder case.

Wolf videotaped a July 2005 protest during the G-8 economic summit in which anarchists were suspected of vandalizing a San Francisco police car. One officer was struck during the rally and his skull was fractured.

Wolf sold some of the footage to San Francisco television stations and posted some of it on his Web site. He was jailed after refusing to turn over unpublished material to federal authorities investigating the crimes, claiming he is a journalist protected under the First Amendment.

His attorneys will make the same argument at Tuesday’s hearing, and at the very least want a judge to allow Wolf to leave prison for Thanksgiving. If the effort fails, he could remain jailed until the grand jury’s term expires in July.

With the Internet’s growth, the definition of a reporter has been blurred. Bloggers like Wolf now have an instant news platform.

Wolf himself has never denied having an agenda and supporting left-wing causes. His Web site,, leads off with the statement “The Revolution will be televised.”

“If I have any reservations about whether or not he is a journalist, it is whether he went there as an independent gatherer of news and information,” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, which has filed court papers on Wolf’s behalf. “We certainly hope that in the future, if he goes to these events, he makes up his mind as to whether he’s a journalist or a protester.”

His attorney, Martin Garbus, said Monday that Wolf was at last year’s protest solely for newsgathering purposes. Some of the unpublished material, he said, is of his friends speaking to the camera.

“He wasn’t demonstrating,” Garbus said. “He was there taking video.”

Peter Scheer, executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition, said the group has doubts about whether Wolf is a journalist, but still argued in court on his behalf.

“We have assumed that he is a journalist because he has asserted that,” Scheer said. “One can cross a line from being a journalist, who is essentially a chronicler of the news, to being an active participant in making it. (But) I’m not saying Josh Wolf has crossed the line.”

The inherent issues in this case go the heart of modern journalism. It’s impossible to know exactly what Wolf had in mind when filming his footage, but I believe that he should not have to turn over the offending material. Journalists are protected under the law for a reason (which doesn’t mean, however, that any behaviour is acceptable.) In this instance, it appears that Wolf was simply filming proceedings.

For a supposed democracy to imprison an individual for this amount of time is a disgrace.

no comments – be the first ↪