Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Rationalising the worst side

One of Israel’s primary exports: torture.

2 comments ↪
  • http://NA A NON FARMER

    Torture.
    Some find it fun and arrange their careers so that they may exploit their power over others towards their personal gratification.
    Starts out at school when ‘team leaders’ are chosen by their ability to order their peers about.
    Given that this sort usually pander to the attentions of those who ‘overview’ the daily activity – the situation arises where the ‘educators’ get to goof off and leave the chookrun to the attentions of yet another generation of emerging corporate psychopaths.

    Of course – this is only my opinion based upon some fifty-plus years of life.

    I submit that some are more subtle than others but do reasonably suggest that the entire structure of society is subsumed towards the placement of a serried row of complete crackercats in every level of decisionmaking throughout our respective societies.

    Putting it simply – when was the last time you went along with a perfectly prepared case to a statutory decisionmaker for even the simplest matter without coming close to a coronary before the matter was resolved at the stroke of their pen?
    Then given this propensity – what do these people get up to in a situation where graft or the ability to exercise personal inclination becomes a factor?

  • http://NA A NON FARMER

    Dear Antony,

    For once I'd like to copy off something I sent elsewhere about difficulty in another land.

    I believe it is important enough to be repeated this once.

    Furthermore it appears I'm the only one stupid/ innocent/politically naive enough enough to respond to your missive.

    Her goes. An idea that might be applied elsewhere if we all relaxed a bit –

    "I have to say that Afghanistan has always accepted men of integrity.

    Most Afghanis speak of Iskandar as if he was a Great Uncle.

    I speak of Alexander the Great.

    What is it about Afghanistan that we have to interfere anyway?

    Is it because since Iskandar they abided no overlord for very long?

    Is it because they produced good Hashish?

    Is it because they fought off the might of the Soviet Union?

    Or is it because they are all an incredibly proud people who want no more than to go their own way towards solving their own problems in their own time????

    It really is such a bloody shame that if outside intervention is a no-choice situation for Afghanis – that our Australian and New Zealand troops do not have the resources to take the task on 100 percent.

    Because if they could – they might supplant Alexander's legend, and by dint of similar values shared with such proud people, bring some respite and decency to a much oppressed land."