Debating the role of the US in a majority Muslim country

A few days ago I spoke at a session here at the Ubud Writers and Readers Festival with Fatima Bhutto that discussed the role of Barack Obama in the world.

An Indonesian blogger argues that Bhutto and I were too skeptical towards the US President and we shouldn’t expect the US to solve the world’s problems.

Personally speaking, I don’t, and that’s why looking to Obama to fix the Middle East conflict, when Washington is always Israel’s lawyer, is deeply mistaken.

  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Digg

2 Responses to “Debating the role of the US in a majority Muslim country”


  • Dear Antony,
    As the Indonesian blogger mentioned I would just like to clarify that I was arguing, during the discussion and later on line, that Obama’s election is significant in the light of US racial history and his platform of diplomacy etc, though of course it is not (yet?) the same as achieving those goals (in this light the Nobel prize is just plain silly). But to diss him completely for just spouting “rhetoric” while being fully aware of his constraints and the legacy he inherited is cynical.
    with hope,
    Rio

  • Mr. Loewenstein

    I do not want to assume anything, but by your last name I think you may be Jewish. Which leaves me a little puzzled by your criticism of Israel and her effort to protect herself and the US acting as her lawyer. Perhaps you may find the following informative, but of course I do not have your wisdom or insight into the world as a whole.

    As for Obama, so far he is a dismal failure and as the President of the US he is more concerned of being a world citizen not the leader of Americans. I can speak for the many Americans I know and we are unhappy with the course he is taking in our great nation and his turning his back on Israel. I am a true supporter of Israel and do know it’s history.

    I have attached the following for you to read, but of course this is only the opinion of the former commander of the British forces in Afghanistan.

    Regards and my respect to you.
    CM

    UN Watch Oral Statement
    Delivered by Colonel Richard Kemp, 16 October 2009
    UN Human Rights Council: 12th Special Session
    Thank you, Mr. President.
    I am the former commander of the British forces in Afghanistan. I served with NATO and the United Nations; commanded troops in Northern Ireland, Bosnia and Macedonia; and participated in the Gulf War. I spent considerable time in Iraq since the 2003 invasion, and worked on international terrorism for the UK Government’s Joint Intelligence Committee.
    Mr. President, based on my knowledge and experience, I can say this: During Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli Defence Forces did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare.
    Israel did so while facing an enemy that deliberately positioned its military capability behind the human shield of the civilian population.
    Hamas, like Hizballah, are expert at driving the media agenda. Both will always have people ready to give interviews condemning Israeli forces for war crimes. They are adept at staging and distorting incidents.
    The IDF faces a challenge that we British do not have to face to the same extent. It is the automatic, Pavlovian presumption by many in the international media, and international human rights groups, that the IDF are in the wrong, that they are abusing human rights.
    The truth is that the IDF took extraordinary measures to give Gaza civilians notice of targeted areas, dropping over 2 million leaflets, and making over 100,000 phone calls. Many missions that could have taken out Hamas military capability were aborted to prevent civilian casualties. During the conflict, the IDF allowed huge amounts of humanitarian aid into Gaza. To deliver aid virtually into your enemy’s hands is, to the military tactician, normally quite unthinkable. But the IDF took on those risks.
    Despite all of this, of course innocent civilians were killed. War is chaos and full of mistakes. There have been mistakes by the British, American and other forces in Afghanistan and in Iraq, many of which can be put down to human error. But mistakes are not war crimes.
    More than anything, the civilian casualties were a consequence of Hamas’ way of fighting. Hamas deliberately tried to sacrifice their own civilians.
    Mr. President, Israel had no choice apart from defending its people, to stop Hamas from attacking them with rockets.
    And I say this again: the IDF did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare.
    Thank you, Mr. President.

Leave a Reply

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree