Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Haunted faces in the ruins of Gaza, one year on

Guardian films on the one-year anniversary of the Gaza conflict, families whose lives have been shattered by US-made weapons.

Such images are sadly familiar. I saw similiar scenes in Gaza in July and nothing has changed.

  • Shaun

    I truly hope for their sake that they now finally realise that firing rockets into Israel is a bad idea.

  • Kevin Charles Herber


    Poor old  "Shaun"…what a monumental coward…..yet another armchair militarist.


    We supporters of GAZA are looking forward to the time when the Israeli IDF cowards realise that committing genocide against unarmed civilians, is a bad idea.


    When some crazy far right wing Zionist zealot or Iran bombs Tel Aviv you should give us your thoughts then.



  • ej

    This Shaun arsehole sniping has gone beyond a joke.

    Reads nothing, understands nothing.

    The Sderot rockets are symptoms not causes of the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. pathetic responses from a community trapped as animals by sadistic keepers.

    And this racist cretin? symptomatic of the tribalism and primitive ignorance that led to the Jewish Holocaust.

  • Shaun

    There is a heavy price to pay for killing Jews.  People on this board may not like it, you may stomp your feet, kick, scream and hurl abuse.  You may long for the days when Jews were weak and allowed themselves to be persecuted without fighting back.  Too bad.  You pick a fight, you better be ready to face the consequences of losing.

  • Shaun:


    You are a remarkable case of an Zionist antisemite.


    "You may long for the days when Jews were weak and allowed themselves to be persecuted without fighting back."


    … for instance is deeply antisemitic because it essentialises Jews as weak, defenseless creatures who 'didn't fight back'. This is of course ahistorical claptrap which you find peddled mostly in the worst, ultra far right Zionist circles.


    On the basis of this antisemitic canard, Shaun then comes up with another fallacy, namely that it's OK to attach greater value to Jewish life and extract higher retribution in return for loss of it. If a Black Supremacist comes up with equivalent tropes we know what to call him/her. Well, when a supremacist Zionist like Shaun comes up with them, we need to call that for what its is too: naked antisemitism.

  • Shaun

    … for instance is deeply antisemitic because it essentialises Jews as weak, defenseless creatures who ‘didn’t fight back’.

    No it doesn't, it simply recognises reality – something that is very lacking in this forum.  Of course some fought back against their tormentors during the Shoah and the centries of persecution that proceeded it.  However, the scale of that resistance has been greatly been exagerated for a variety of reasons including an attempt to soothe the discomfort felt at the realisation that so many did so little to stop what was happenening.  The sad fact is that for every Jew that physically resisted, there were thousands that did nothing either out of legitimate fear for what would happen to their loved ones, or in the futile hope that the Nazis wouldn't kill them if they cooperated.  The overwhelming reality of the Shoah is that millions lined up in front of pits or walked into gas chambers without raising a hand or saying a word.  

    Then you go on to accuse me of saying things that I never said ie "Shaun then comes up with another fallacy, namely that it’s OK to attach greater value to Jewish life and extract higher retribution in return for loss of it."  I never said such a thing and find that view offensive.  The 'Palestinians' simply need to know for their own sake and the sake of thier children that their will be terrible consequences for trying to kill any Israeli whether they be Druze, Samaratin,  Muslim and yes, Jewish.  I desperately hope that they don't make the same mistake again.

    You throw the word anti-Semite at me four times and yet the crowd on this forum endlessless whinge and whine about the overuse of that phrase by supporters of Israel.  Your slurs against me are a discrace Gert but typical of the level of discourse found here. 

  • Mallee


    it is painfull for me to join this discusion as I feel that everyone should be at peace, but you seem to be missing a few bits of informationn, not that I claim to be a know all.

    You said that suggesting that Jews are weak simply recognises reality. I do not accept that Jews are weak. When we speak of jews, there are many groupings, jewish cultures and interpretations of Judaism. I say that generally as I do not claim to be an expert on the subject. But generally; there are the semites originating from the 'old' Israel area, (which include semitic wh are not jews if you check up the DNA studies) there are the Ashkenazis who originate from South Russia, being a Mongol mob that converted round about 500 AD (?).

    In distinguishing the original Jews from the interlopers and their descendants; which is regarded as weak, both or just one group?. Then there are other ultra-orthodox jews, who I suppose are the equivalent of fundamentalist Christians and/or Hindus and/or Muslims or some other biggoted belief system.

    I suppose my point is; what are Jews? Are athiests Jews? If they are, how can they believe that they are favoured by a 'god'.

    So "Jews are weak" really means nothing. Some are certainly not weak, if killing of innocents is regaraded as not being weak, e.g. opertaion Suzannah (Lavon affair) the killing of our allied soldiers in the King David Hotel, the false flag attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 and the murder of US sailors during the attack, not to mention the 'over killing ' in Gaza last year and the creeping confiscating of Palestinian land and freedoms.

    Of course many (most) Jews are strong, they are usually the beings that have equal regard for all humanity without the failures of regarding themselves as superior  in intellect, culture or in the eyes of God. I know many such persons, now that is what strength is all about, it is not a weakness.

  • Shaun


    Thanks for your interesting perspective.  I think I am safe in saying that most people on here will recognise my statement "You may long for the days when Jews were weak and allowed themselves to be persecuted without fighting back" was refererring to the pre-Israel diaspora, particularly in Europe and the wider Middle-East where Jews were treated with contempt and regularly suffered through outbreaks of violent persecution culminating in the Holocaust.  This persecution was levelled at all Jews with no distinction between the orthodox, reform ,conservative, secular or even aethist versions of Jewry that you refer to.  Your distinctions between the "types" of Jews is interesting but made no difference to oppressors like the Cossaks, Nazi's (and today's Islamo-fascists) who targeted Jews as a race rather than as a religion.  

  • Kevin Charles Herber

    Shaun is obviously a racist who like ' big guns & warplanes' to show he's a real man.

    You're facile reasoning re Gaza et al smacks of that old Zionist catch cry "never again"..which translated means "Israel will kill whomever, whenever it likes, and doesn't have to explain". Well old son, it's now being increasingly asked to explain by an ever growing global audience.

    Man, are you a basket case. Like AL says in his book, the further away from Israel a Zionist lives, the more hysterical is his reasoning.

    You're making a fool of yourself, schmutter…but if you feel the need to beat that puny chest, go ahead…HAMAS needs supporters such as you

  • Shaun,


    When in a hole, stop digging.


    Jewry's history is a very checkered one, not a simple and linear one, and your statement does indeed amount 'Jews are weak', weak as in inept, Shaun? Lazy, perhaps? Not courageous? Diseased?


    Your perspective is indeed a post-Holocaust fabrication that serves to legitimise quite a few Zionist crimes but let you remind you that the descendents of victims of past crimes are by no means absolved from the crimes they commit themselves today, even it these crimes are quasi-'justified' by the 'Never again' refrain.


    My accusation of your statements being antisemitic stands, Shaun, certainly in the light of your repetitive defense. Zionism quite often takes antisemuitc viewpoints and allies itself with great glee with antisemitic elements, a la John Hagee and his 'CUFIs'. More examples on request.


    As reagrds the level of discourse here, it's clear it's way over your head.

  • JIll

    Wow, gert, I've visited your anti Semitic blog, and your comments to Shaun are both pompous and ill-informed. And rather nutty.

    Shaun anti Semitic? Puh-LEEZE!!!!!!

    Shaun, nice try commenting here, but one thing most people who believe in reality as reflected in current politics should learn is that many of these antiIsrael blogs are about being anti Israel. Full stop.