Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Assange; Australian government thinks its true master sits in DC

Julian Assange tells The Power Index that Canberra needs to grow a back-bone (fat chance):

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange remains frustrated by the lack of assistance from the Australian federal government over his prolonged overseas legal plight, three weeks ahead of his appeal against extradition in the UK Supreme Court.

In an exclusive interview with The Power Index, the platinum-haired whistleblower revealed Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd’s office had been in contact with his lawyers in the past month but with “no results”.

When asked if he had been receiving adequate assistance from the federal government over his potential extradition from Britain to Sweden, Assange replied: “Of course not”.

“Almost no Australian who is involved in trouble overseas receives the assistance they should,” he said. “Australia is famous for its lack of assistance to its people who enter into difficulty overseas.”

A clearly-discouraged Assange said Prime Minister Julia Gillard, former Attorney-General Robert McClelland and other members of the ALP had “risen above their population and developed network connections with elites in other countries”.

“That is their game … and in doing so they develop a base outside their own country and are no longer political accountable to the people of their country,” he told The Power Index.

“[They] have been working their international connections, yes at my expense, but also at the expense of the Australian people.”

Assange is currently awaiting a hearing in the Supreme Court to be held early in February, where a panel of seven judges will consider his appeal against extradition on accusations of rape and sexual assault of two women.

If Assange loses the appeal he could face extradition within weeks. There is another option of appeal which could see him take the case to the European Court of Human Rights.

The 40-year-old Australian said the prime minister, who has denounced the actions of WikiLeaks as “illegal” in the past, had not been in contact recently.

A spokesperson for foreign minister Kevin Rudd told The Power Index that consular officers have been in touch with Assange’s lawyers and were “closely monitoring” his case.

“The Australian government cannot interfere in the judicial processes of other governments but Australia’s ambassador to Stockholm has sought and obtained assurances from Swedish authorities that Mr Assange’s case will proceed in accordance with due process,” the spokesperson said.

“Such assurances have also been sought and obtained from the relevant UK authorities.”

Greens Senator Scott Ludlam said he believed the government had not done enough to assist Assange, who has been under house arrest for more than a year.

“I think it would be much better for the Australian government to pull out all the stops and that means not just consular assistance, it means diplomatic activity and it means political statements,” he told The Power Index.

“We need to hear the prime minister and the attorney-general quite clearly advocating to the US that they would not support onward extradition of an Australian journalist to face trumped up charges in the United States.”

  • Billy

    i think you will find it is because they actually are in DC:

    Business Address
    WASHINGTON DC 20036 (see all company filings)

  • wrb330

    This is the type of whoa is me trupe that gives me nausea..
    Assange is facing charges overseas, theefoe he is subject to the laws of the land he has allegedly commited the offence in. Just as tourists who commit crimes in Australia are punisherd under our laws for the offence.
    Cut the bleeding heart crap as to date you only have the word of an accused person that hes innocent and being persecuted, insofar as accurate facts of his innocence you have none… He just maa be guilty, thought of that have you?
    His possible extradition from Britain to Sweden is none .. I repeat NONE of Australias business except to be concerned over his welfare, the alleged crime was commited in sweden & as such extradition matters are none of Australias business.
    Assanges claim hes not getting enough assistance.. your an idiot if you think he would state otherwise and a bigger fool to think his claims of innocence make it so.

  • Marilyn

    I wonder then why they went out of the way for the boy arrested for drugs.

  • examinator

    Based on the charges as they are and not the personality, the Australian Government should have been all over this like flies and bull dust in an outback summer, instead of dodos and fresh Mammoth poo in Texas.

    It's very sad and short sighted of the Australian public that it hasn't learnt the wise lessons of the US founding fathers. One once said something to the point of, any body that gives up freedom (independence) for security deserves (ends up with) neither.
    Make no bones about it we can only rely on the US so long as it is in their interests. Don't kid your selves they regard us much the same way as you, your prepubescent son's pet rat.

    One correction though with Assange's statement Washington is only the centralised spin department for the real Controllers of the USA for that one needs to contact ALEC.

    The best response to America (USA) is the same Aussie sign language interpretation of the air hostie's safety instruction gestures.
    Interpretation see Adam Hills

  • examinator

    Why does someone have to be an idiot because they don't agree with you?
    Perhaps some of us don't see this issue as being quite so simplistically, black or white as you seem to.
    I would suggest that it is naive not to see the web of politics behind this.
    Be it the, if you don't like one prosecutor then find one you do (of the Swedes).
    Be it a government simply playing politics.
    Be it prominent feminists making a point. Why the time delays? between the acts and the complaints?
    I'm not saying that he isn't guilty, I simply don't know, that is for a court to determine.

    What I am inferring is that this isn't entirely about a Aussie transgressing another country's laws….simply put political tactics require political actions, our government should be wading in publicly to balance the scales ….not hiding behind bureaucracy ( So as not seen by the USA as siding with someone who they are doing their damnedest to create a law to justify their ire [embarrassment]) .

    Rather our government should be ensuring that he gets a fair trial. Something I'm not convinced he'll get without public political support. Given our PM's stated disdain for him by pre judging him on previous unsupported accusations, his profile, the nature of alleged crime, the press coverage, and the political action to polarise the Swedish public all to?? make a feminist point/ a given.
    After all THAT is one of the points for carrying an Aussie passport

  • Julian Assange is not charged with any crime in Sweden nor in any other country. He is simply wanted for questioning in Sweden over an alleged sex offence. There is no legal requirement for him to be in Sweden for questioning. He could be questioned via phone, or in person in London (or in any other city/country) by Swedish officials should they decide to do so. Alternatively, if there is enough evidence that a crime was committed, why hasn't the Swedish prosecutor laid charges?

    In contrast, alleged war criminals face extradition only after charges have been laid by the extraditing country (eg. Dragan Vasiljkovic who is being extradited from Australia to Croatia).

    So why do alleged war criminals, alleged murderers, and alleged rapists get legal due process, but alleged sex offenders who founded WikiLeaks get a politically motivated kangaroo court process?