Tag Archive for 'Wikipedia'

Have blog, will rebel

The following news story and interview, by Rob Bates (photo by Alan Place), appears in this week’s Wentworth Courier newspaper:

Controversial author, journalist and blogger Antony Loewenstein will host an event at Paddington’s Fringe Bar to discuss internet censorship and the brave few who rise against it.

Loewenstein’s first book, My Israel Question, received mixed reviews ranging from glowing praise to death threats as it offered a critical Jewish perspective on the Israel-Palestine conflict.

“There’s a lot of fear in the Jewish community about Israel not being seen as the ideal state and so I was accused of being an anti-Semite, a self-hating Jew and even a Nazi,” he said.

“This hasn’t intimidated me, which was clearly the intention, but inspired me because I know many people want free and open debate on Israel’s behaviour without fear of being labelled.”

For his latest book, The Blogging Revolution, Loewenstein trekked through Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Cuba and China talking to dissidents who risked their lives to speak out against oppressive regimes.

As well as telling their frightening and courageous stories, the book assesses the role of major western companies like Microsoft and Google in facilitating internet censorship and persecution.

“These companies do exactly what they’re told and even pre-empt the censorship by blocking things before they’ve been asked to,” he said.

“In the last five years, Yahoo China has handed over information about a number of Chinese dissidents using Gmail, resulting in lengthy prison sentences or worse.”

Admitting that companies working in these countries were “over a barrel”, Loewenstein said more could be done to “push back”. “The head of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, recently went to China to meet with senior censorship officials and discuss how they could move toward change,” he said.

“He might fail, he may not change anything but I applaud him for starting the dialogue.”

Loewenstein said it was critical for Australians to be aware of the push for tighter censorship in our own country and demand a greater diversity of voices in our media.

“I’m not saying that blogging is about to replace mainstream media but I definitely think it will have a greater role in the shifting structure,” he said.

“More and more I think people are craving independent, alternative information and are frustrated that they’re not getting it from mainstream media.”

You can’t beat the Wikipedia bug

Crooked Timber asks a legitimate question:

Can anyone help me understand why some people are so vehemently opposed to certain people (or topics) having entries on Wikipedia? Why do people get so worked up about the mere existence of certain entries? Currently, an entry for Joe the Plumber is being debated. Does it really dilute the value of Wikipedia to have entries like that? I remember when some people contested my entry (I wasn’t the one to put it up), it felt like some amateurish tenure review, except with not quite the same consequences. Would anyone care to defend the practice? I’m eager to understand the motivations better.

Contact with the regime

What happened when the founder of Wikipedia met a leading Chinese internet censorship official?

A dull, academic version?

Just what is the Wikipedia style?

The online conundrum

Taking the internet and putting it in the real world:

German publishing giant Bertelsmann plans to publish the world’s first reference book based on entries gathered from Wikipedia, the mammoth online encyclopedia written by volunteers.

Bertelsmann believes some people who would rather leaf through a hands-on, printed book than surf through the Internet.

The company said on Wednesday, April 23, it would publish a print, German-language version of free online encyclopedia Wikipedia based on the 50,000 most commonly searched terms on the Web site from the past two years.

Meanwhile, Google faces the wrath of a private investigator.

When real history isn’t accurate enough

Revealed: how the Zionist lobby attempts to rewrite history and dishonesty change entries on Wikipedia.

American tax-dollars well spent

And you thought Guantanamo Bay was just about illegal detention and torture?

Think again (thanks to the essential Wikileaks site):

The US detention facility at Guantanamo Bay has been caught conducting covert propaganda attacks on the internet. The attacks, exposed this week in a report by the government transparency group Wikileaks, include deleting detainee ID numbers from Wikipedia last month, the systematic posting of unattributed “self praise” comments on news organization web sites in response to negative press, boosting pro-Guantanamo stories on the internet news site Digg and even modifying Fidel Castro’s encyclopedia article to describe the Cuban president as “an admitted transexual”.

Shayana Kadidal, Managing Attorney of the Center for Constitutional Rights Guantanamo Global Justice Initiative, said in response to the report:

“The military’s efforts to alter the record by vandalizing Wikipedia are of a piece with the amateurism of their other public relations efforts: their ridiculous claims that released detainees who criticize the United States in the media have ‘returned to the battlefield,’.