Killing Arabs in the name of Judaism

The London Times writes about the growing radicalism of the IDF:

During the Gaza war this year, Schmuel Kaufman, a military rabbi from a West Bank settlement, used to stride between the Israeli soldiers’ tents and urge them to fight what he deemed an “obligatory war” ordained by ancient scripture.

“It’s a holy war to protect women and children from the south of the country after a long period of endurance on our side,” he told The Times. “The commander of the battalion asked me to blow the shofar [a ram’s horn] every time before going into the fighting. I’m blowing the shofar while 500 soldiers stand behind me praying. They went in wrapped in holiness.”

Rabbi Kaufman and many other religious soldiers attributed Israel’s very low casualty rate in the month-long conflict to the newfound religiosity of its Armed Forces. In recent years, the army has become more devout, with an increasing number of recruits from religious and nationalist groups, including settlers.

40 to 50 percent of IDF soldiers are supposedly religious.

When will Zionists realise that their homeland is becoming a land of extremes?

2 comments

Shoddy behaviour will catch up with you

This news is welcome in a nation such as China where web repression is deep:

A Chinese academic has successfully sued an internet company for closing his website after he posted articles on subjects including corruption and environmental issues.

Hu Xingdou, professor of economics at the Beijing Institute of Technology, said he hoped his case would encourage other users to protect their rights and net censors to make decisions more responsibly.

“I was surprised when I won. In the past, there have been people suing like me, but either the court did not take the case or they failed. This is the first successful case in China of a netizen or internet user suing their internet service provider,” Hu told the Guardian.

I discuss in my book The Blogging Revolution about growing attempts by Chinese citizens to hold web companies to account, but I look forward to the day when Western firms like Google and Yahoo are fully investigated over their complicity.

Not unlike Shell is currently experiencing in a New York courtroom.

no comments

Iraq certainly ruined the concept just a bit

What is the true meaning of humanitarian intervention? And why is the global community so hopeless at stopping violence against citizens in states?

no comments

Freedom means offending people

The curious case of US academic William Robinson under attack by the Israel lobby was mentioned here in late April.

Since then, however, a number of free speech advocates have come forward to defend Robinson’s right to circulate a blog posting that juxtaposed images of Jews from the Holocaust with images of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip amongst students within his Sociology of Globalization class.

no comments

Murdering innocents is a small price to pay

The Sri Lankan state has caused untold suffering against the Tamil people in the north of the country.

The government reminds me of Israel, a rogue nation that indiscriminately kills civilians, something now even they acknowledge:

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Telegraph, Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan, alias Colonel Karuna, said president Mahinda Rajapaksa had made a mistake when he claimed no-one died at the hands of the army.

His comments undermine the government’s previous claims and will alert western diplomats gathering evidence on civilian deaths for a future war crimes case.

no comments

Will the US really challenge this?

Russia talks sense (while Israel simply continues to expand settlements in the West Bank):

Russia’s foreign minister has said talks with the Palestinian group Hamas were “needed” to achieve lasting peace in the Middle East.

“We are certain that this is needed,” the Russia interfax news agency quoted Sergei Lavrov as saying on Sunday after meeting Khaled Meshaal, the Hamas leader, in the Syrian capital, Damascus, where he lives in exile.

“It was the first very important step on the way to overcoming the present stagnation in the negotiations process,” Lavrov said about the meeting.

“The two main aims are to stop Israel’s current policy on the settlements and from the Palestinian side to rebuild and reunite the peoples [Hamas and Fatah].”

no comments

Free trips to fellate Israel

Are there no limits to the whoring the political and media elite won’t display towards Israel?

Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard will lead a delegation to Israel next month as part of a bid to strengthen political, business and cultural ties between Australia and Israel.

The tour, organised by pro-Israel lobby group the Australia Israel Cultural Exchange, will include in the 40-strong delegation Liberal MPs Peter Costello, Christopher Pyne, George Brandis, Guy Barnett, Labor MP Mark Dreyfus, QC, Jewish scientists, academics, businessmen and women, plus conservative News Limited columnists Greg Sheridan , Andrew Bolt and Alan Howe.

Expect discussions about Israeli “democracy”, “rule of law”, “dedication to peace” and “Palestinian terrorism.”

Expect nothing about the reality of Zionist apartheid.

Even some previously pro-Israel politicians in the US are waking up.

6 comments

What form of censorship will come next?

The ever-growing rise of fascism in the Israeli state.

And just the latest example:

Today was the start of the 2nd Palestine Festival of Literature, slated to open at the Palestinian National Theater in East Jerusalem. The festival began as a call from Edward Said, to “reaffirm the power of culture over the culture of power.” As participants were gathering, the Israeli police shut down the theater. The French consul who was in attendance, offered the French Cultural Center as a new venue in the moment, in order for the festival to continue.

Where is the global Jewish outcry about this?

Of course it doesn’t exist because Zionist authoritarianism has the silent support of many Jews.

2 comments

You can have your say about which rights and responsibilities matter

Want to be involved in Australia’s current debate over a possible human rights charter?

Get online.

no comments

Blogging may be the future, perhaps

The Sydney Writer’s Festival was a blast over the weekend. One of the highlights was speaking and hanging with the author of Stuff White People Like, Christian Lander. Funny man, a very funny and perceptive man.

Writer Irfan Yusuf – whose book, Once Were Radicals, I launched a few weeks ago in Sydney – had a piece in today’s Crikey (see below) about one of my sessions yesterday regarding blogging and journalism. What isn’t said in this article is that such discussions can be tiresome if contributors simply talk about themselves. Frankly, bloggers can often be far better and accountable journalists than many who call themselves journalists:

To blog or not to blog? That was just one of the questions posed by moderator Rachel Hills to a panel of bloggers, journalists and one burnt-out ex-journalist at a Sydney Writers’ Festival gig on Sunday.

The panel consisted of former Sydney Morning Herald scribe and Webdiary founder Margo Kingston, blogger and author Antony Loewenstein, blogger and tabloid opinion editor Tim Blair and blogger and former editor of Girlfriend magazine Erica Bartle. Their task was to test the following proposition: “If bloggers are all wannabe journalists and journalists are all complacent hacks, why do so few manage to cross over?”

The discussion was fairly free-flowing and surprisingly civil, given what one participant has written about two of the others. I’ll summarise in “first person” what each speaker said at various points.

Kingston: Paul McGeogh kinda pushed me into citizen journalism via what was once the Herald’s Webdiary, and I’m not sure whether to thank or sue him. The interaction with readers was the best thing that happened to me in journalism. Webdiary contributors included concerned expats and rural readers. Journos often put on a persona of detachment because they don’t want their own personal failings exposed whilst quite happy to expose the same failings in others. Many future blog-related jobs will be about moderating comments, and those employed have a high burnout rate. Currently sub-editors do this.

Loewenstein: Why can’t journalists also be advocates? Many effectively advocate despite the veneer of objectivity. Studies have shown that the vast majority of media stories are generated from one source or press release. Journos rarely talk to real people, content to talk to each other. In many non-Western countries, bloggers are the only source of non-state information and take enormous risks, many jailed and tortured.

Bartle: There are no rules in blogging, unlike journalism. Blogs provide a superficial readership experience. I rarely spend an hour online reading a feature article. So much womens magazine journalism is just googling or desktop journalism, with not enough going out into the “fashion trenches”. Rarely do magazine writers speak to people beyond fixed contact lists. Journalist hopefuls should be careful with what they put online as potential employers may not like what you write even if it’s well-written.

Blair: I started blogging after a long career in journalism for Time Magazine and the Daily Telegraph. I’m somewhat lazy and the short form of blogging suited me. When you write a blog post, you can’t help but tell something about yourself (perhaps something like this?). Blog journalists are surprisingly thin-skinned. I encourage young upcoming journos to blog. It’s like an online CV. In these recessionary times, blogging can lead to employment. The Daily Telegraph doesn’t have paid comment moderators (Yep, we can tell).

And what did the chairperson have to say? My notes show Rachel Hills saying she only found a few bloggers in mainstream media interesting enough to visit.

no comments

Beyond time to wield the massive stick

Israel’s Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya’alon said on Saturday:

Settlements are not the reason that the peace process is failing, they were never an obstacle, not at any stage. Even when Israel pulled out of [Palestinian] territory, the terror continued. Even when we uprooted [Jewish] communities, we got ‘Hamastan.’ That is why I propose that we think about it – not in slogans and not with decrees.

Gideon Levy writes in Haaretz that Israel is sleep-walking to disaster:

Barack Obama has made Israel an offer it cannot – and must not – refuse, yet Israel fails to wake up. Where are those 57 percent of Israelis who said in the latest Haaretz poll that they support a two-state solution? What do they think? That this solution, which they allegedly support, will fall from the sky, without lifting a finger, without making waves among the depths of society, waves that will put such a grandiose process in motion? Where are the protests against the anti-peace position of our elected prime minister, who continues with his hackneyed we-will-not-divide-Jerusalem and we-will-not-come-down-from-the-Golan?

no comments

Treating their own badly

Israeli bloggers campaign for worker’s rights.

no comments