Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein trav­els across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, the United States, Britain, Greece, and Australia to witness the reality of disaster capitalism. He discovers how companies such as G4S, Serco, and Halliburton cash in on or­ganized misery in a hidden world of privatized detention centers, militarized private security, aid profiteering, and destructive mining.

Disaster has become big business. Talking to immigrants stuck in limbo in Britain or visiting immigration centers in America, Loewenstein maps the secret networks formed to help cor­porations bleed what profits they can from economic crisis. He debates with Western contractors in Afghanistan, meets the locals in post-earthquake Haiti, and in Greece finds a country at the mercy of vulture profiteers. In Papua New Guinea, he sees a local commu­nity forced to rebel against predatory resource companies and NGOs.

What emerges through Loewenstein’s re­porting is a dark history of multinational corpo­rations that, with the aid of media and political elites, have grown more powerful than national governments. In the twenty-first century, the vulnerable have become the world’s most valu­able commodity. Disaster Capitalism is published by Verso in 2015 and in paperback in January 2017.

Profits_of_doom_cover_350Vulture capitalism has seen the corporation become more powerful than the state, and yet its work is often done by stealth, supported by political and media elites. The result is privatised wars and outsourced detention centres, mining companies pillaging precious land in developing countries and struggling nations invaded by NGOs and the corporate dollar. Best-selling journalist Antony Loewenstein travels to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Haiti, Papua New Guinea and across Australia to witness the reality of this largely hidden world of privatised detention centres, outsourced aid, destructive resource wars and militarized private security. Who is involved and why? Can it be stopped? What are the alternatives in a globalised world? Profits of Doom, published in 2013 and released in an updated edition in 2014, challenges the fundamentals of our unsustainable way of life and the money-making imperatives driving it. It is released in an updated edition in 2014.
forgodssakecover Four Australian thinkers come together to ask and answer the big questions, such as: What is the nature of the universe? Doesn't religion cause most of the conflict in the world? And Where do we find hope?   We are introduced to different belief systems – Judaism, Christianity, Islam – and to the argument that atheism, like organised religion, has its own compelling logic. And we gain insight into the life events that led each author to their current position.   Jane Caro flirted briefly with spiritual belief, inspired by 19th century literary heroines such as Elizabeth Gaskell and the Bronte sisters. Antony Loewenstein is proudly culturally, yet unconventionally, Jewish. Simon Smart is firmly and resolutely a Christian, but one who has had some of his most profound spiritual moments while surfing. Rachel Woodlock grew up in the alternative embrace of Baha'i belief but became entranced by its older parent religion, Islam.   Provocative, informative and passionately argued, For God's Sakepublished in 2013, encourages us to accept religious differences, but to also challenge more vigorously the beliefs that create discord.  
After Zionism, published in 2012 and 2013 with co-editor Ahmed Moor, brings together some of the world s leading thinkers on the Middle East question to dissect the century-long conflict between Zionism and the Palestinians, and to explore possible forms of a one-state solution. Time has run out for the two-state solution because of the unending and permanent Jewish colonization of Palestinian land. Although deep mistrust exists on both sides of the conflict, growing numbers of Palestinians and Israelis, Jews and Arabs are working together to forge a different, unified future. Progressive and realist ideas are at last gaining a foothold in the discourse, while those influenced by the colonial era have been discredited or abandoned. Whatever the political solution may be, Palestinian and Israeli lives are intertwined, enmeshed, irrevocably. This daring and timely collection includes essays by Omar Barghouti, Jonathan Cook, Joseph Dana, Jeremiah Haber, Jeff Halper, Ghada Karmi, Antony Loewenstein, Saree Makdisi, John Mearsheimer, Ahmed Moor, Ilan Pappe, Sara Roy and Phil Weiss.
The 2008 financial crisis opened the door for a bold, progressive social movement. But despite widespread revulsion at economic inequity and political opportunism, after the crash very little has changed. Has the Left failed? What agenda should progressives pursue? And what alternatives do they dare to imagine? Left Turn, published by Melbourne University Press in 2012 and co-edited with Jeff Sparrow, is aimed at the many Australians disillusioned with the political process. It includes passionate and challenging contributions by a diverse range of writers, thinkers and politicians, from Larissa Berendht and Christos Tsiolkas to Guy Rundle and Lee Rhiannon. These essays offer perspectives largely excluded from the mainstream. They offer possibilities for resistance and for a renewed struggle for change.
The Blogging Revolution, released by Melbourne University Press in 2008, is a colourful and revelatory account of bloggers around the globe why live and write under repressive regimes - many of them risking their lives in doing so. Antony Loewenstein's travels take him to private parties in Iran and Egypt, internet cafes in Saudi Arabia and Damascus, to the homes of Cuban dissidents and into newspaper offices in Beijing, where he discovers the ways in which the internet is threatening the ruld of governments. Through first-hand investigations, he reveals the complicity of Western multinationals in assisting the restriction of information in these countries and how bloggers are leading the charge for change. The blogging revolution is a superb examination about the nature of repression in the twenty-first century and the power of brave individuals to overcome it. It was released in an updated edition in 2011, post the Arab revolutions, and an updated Indian print version in 2011.
The best-selling book on the Israel/Palestine conflict, My Israel Question - on Jewish identity, the Zionist lobby, reporting from Palestine and future Middle East directions - was released by Melbourne University Press in 2006. A new, updated edition was released in 2007 (and reprinted again in 2008). The book was short-listed for the 2007 NSW Premier's Literary Award. Another fully updated, third edition was published in 2009. It was released in all e-book formats in 2011. An updated and translated edition was published in Arabic in 2012.

Dershowitz in Sydney calls for quick little bombing run of Iran

Last night in Sydney – and what an event to miss! – Sydney Morning Herald political editor Peter Hartcher interviewed Alan Dershowitz. Hartcher is a perfect person, being a close friend of the lobby (along with receiving free trips to Israel).

Sounds like there were too many “highlights” to mention but this stands out:

Dershowitz said that the Israeli red line, a line which if crossed by Iran would invoke an attack, is six months ahead of America’s and he advocated a three day war by the U.S. to knock out Iran’s nuclear infrastructure in order to maintain peace in a region threatened by Iran’s nuclear capability.

War is peace. Bombing helps stability. Zionism is all about love.

With 2000 people hearing Dershowitz at this venue and no doubt many of them Jews who love the idea of a Zionist who speaks about glorious Israeli democracy, occupation and bombing Iran, my religion is sick, perhaps beyond repair.

  • Antony allow me to correct your egregious mistake.
    I was actually at the Dershowtiz evening last night and you have completely take his comments out of their context. His statement was that he rejected a bombing campaign on Iran and based on all available evidence, including Israeli sabre-rattling in The Atlantic article, they did not want to strike because there was no 100% guarantee that they would remove the threat without causing massive amounts of casualties (remember that many of these reactors and facilities are based near major population centres). Dershowitz spoke about the possible fall-out of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons including the threat of a nuclear umbrella that would shield terror groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah and the fact that it has already started an arms race in the Middle East (fearing an Iranian bomb Saudi Arabia has recently bought a number of high-tech weapons from the United States). Whilst Dershowitz stated that an Israeli or American (or combined) attack on Iranian facilities was a bad idea he stated that the greatest danger would be if Iran managed to successfully acquire nuclear weapons.
    I’m also confused as you’ve stated a number of times that you are a self-identified atheist and therefore Judaism is not your religion.

  • H

    <!–[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE <![endif]–><!–[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]–><!–[if gte mso 10]> <! /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} –> <!–[endif]–>

    <!–[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE <![endif]–><!–[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]–><!–[if gte mso 10]> <! /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} –> <!–[endif]–>

    In response to a declaration of war and genocide, every country has a right to self defence, including Israel.

    Ahmadinejad regularly threatens Jews with genocide. Ahmadinejad could easily declare war on Israel. The regular threats of genocide already give Israel a right to self defence. A future declaration of war by Ahmadinejad would give Israel further rights to respond in self defence.

    That war would aim to “knock out Iran’s nuclear infrastructure” and prevent Ahmadinejad’s threatened genocide of Jews using Iranian nuclear weapons.

  • paul walter

     Raffe, on the phenomena of reactors built close to urban areas, how close is Dimona to anything?

     As they said on QA last night, it is ultimately absurd to deny Iran the bomb when so many others also on the flaky side already have it.

     As to Anthony and "Judaism", I'd have little doubt that Anthony understands full-well that his cultural inheritances and his natural intelligence allow him a unique position from which to view and describe events. It's his blessing and his curse, I'd suspect

     He understands "Thou shalt not kill" and the other commandments better than many who pride themselves on their religiosity, having freed himself of more tribal and essentialist trappings of religion in his search for underlying truths.

  • Andrew

    So what do people think that Iran will actually do once they have a nuclear bomb? (and that's assuming they are developing a nuclear bomb, a big assumption in itself) They're hardly going to trot off and drop one on Israel are they? Nuclear bombs are messy things, they'd definitely nuke their Palestinian and Lebanese friends too. The retaliation from the US et al would be so great, Iran would effectively be committing suicide as a nation even attempting such a thing.

    As for Iran threatening genocide of the Jews on a regular basis, I mean really. H should have a look at the Jews in Iran first of all. Have they been wiped out? No, they carry on their religious practices with relatively little interference. Bit difficult to get around that fact, eh H? The call Israel to be "wiped off the map" was a mistranslation that has been widely ignored. Now think whose purposes it serves to perpetuate that mistranslation, hmmm? Check this for starters:
    What about Palestine? Now there's a nation truly in danger of being wiped off the map

    But I digress, the demonisation of Iran is ridiculous, but dangerous and so very reminiscent of the demonisation of Iraq (hello, remember that?) prior to the invasion of Iraq. One million dead in Iraq. Will we be fooled yet again?

  • H

    Iran has expressed its genocidal threats many times.


    The following are comments by Iran's President and other important Government figures:


    Our dear Imam [Khomeini] ordered that this Jerusalem occupying regime [Israel] must be erased from the page of time. This was a very wise statement.

    The cancerous tumor called Israel must be uprooted from the region.

    The foundation of the Islamic regime is opposition to Israel and the perpetual subject of Iran is the elimination of Israel from the region.

    Soon this stain of disgrace [Israel] will be cleaned from the garment of the world of Islam, and this is attainable.

    The region and the world are prepared for great changes and for being cleansed of

    Satanic enemies [USA and Israel].

    [Jews are] a people falsified, invented, will not last; they must leave the territory [Israel].

    The Jews Are Very Filthy People

    The People Wish the Death of America and Israel

    Fight the Jews and Vanquish Them

    Israel should be wiped out of the face of the world. [statement by military]

    Israel must be uprooted and wiped off [the pages of] history. [statement by military]

  • Kevin Charles Herber

    Note to H;

    do a politics 101 course old boy/girl…you sound like another shrill Moriah College racist.

    The guff you're quoting re Israel & Iran has been debunked many times on these & other similar posts. Do some reading…visit Ahmadinejad on MSNBC on You Tube for a start…..don't waste our time with schoolboy/girl invective.

    Also, provide links for your claimed sources…or get lost.

    Raffe: you're way off beam man…I was there also….you had your Zionist bias ears on duty.

    For the real lowdown on Dirty Dershowitz's intellectual substance, watch his attempt to discredit N.Finkelstein on YouTube…..what a lighweight DD is.

    Regardless, he should have been banned from entering Australia due to his support for international terrorism…next time maybe…